Arbitrum really stepped up this time—Emergency action by the Security Council: They froze 30,766 ETH (worth around $70M) from the hacker's address out of the $292M stolen from KelpDAO. The funds have been transferred to an intermediary frozen wallet, and the next steps will require a governance vote by Arbitrum to decide. But the community is completely divided: One side is saying, 'Well done, Kim Jong-un is crying in the bathroom,' while the other side is saying, 'L2s can directly freeze user assets = centralized garbage, ARB is dead.' Last time, when Drift lost $285M, a bunch of people criticized Circle for not freezing USDC in time. Now, Arbitrum moves the hacker's assets, and they're getting slammed for not being decentralized enough. DeFi has always faced an impossible triangle: Security vs Decentralization vs Compliance. So, what does everyone really want—centralization or decentralization?