Insider trading—this term is way too broadly defined. Exchanges themselves are the biggest beneficiaries of insider trading—they know who’s getting liquidated, which wallets are offloading, and when they can borrow coins to dump the market. If you really want to investigate, the first target shouldn’t be the project teams. Retail investors kind of allow it too. Volatility equals opportunity—no volatility, no participants. If the market went sideways every day, even market makers would go out of business. The real issue is the double standard: when market makers dump hundreds of thousands of dollars in a day, it’s called 'providing liquidity.' But when whales accumulate 90% of the supply and pump-and-dump, it’s called 'market manipulation.' Let’s be real, these two things are essentially the same—they’re both about using information and capital advantages to profit off retail investors. If we were to strictly enforce the rule of 'no exploiting information advantages,' the entire secondary market would have to shut down, and market makers would be the first to go.