Simply put, WLFI's proposal can be seen as a signal of sincerity. The two core things are: one is to lock up the warehouse, and the other is to destroy it. 62.28 billion tokens are locked, and it is the kind with rules and cycles, not just verbal words. This operation is actually aimed at reducing people's concerns about "sudden disk crashes". Then there is destruction, with 4.52 billion directly burned, about 10%. This is very intuitive, the supply is directly reduced. Many projects also say they are deflationary, but not many actually take action, which usually gives positive feedback from the market. The team has also made adjustments. Originally, everyone was most afraid of when internal chips would be released, but this time the ownership period has been extended directly. The meaning is simple: if you want to make money, you can, but you have to accompany the project, not engage in short-term arbitrage. The early supporters were the same, although it didn't burn, the unlocking time was also pushed back. Overall, most of the large chips have been 'held down', and the circulation rhythm has become clearer. I personally think that the focus of this proposal is not just on numbers, but on attitude. Are you willing to tie yourself to this ship instead of just letting the market bear the risk. To summarize, it is: Short term selling pressure should be reduced, Long term supply is clearer, Emotionally, there will be a slight increase in points. As for how the price will go, it still depends on the market environment and funding. The proposal itself is more about laying the foundation. If there is narrative or heat behind it, this combination of "lock+burn" still has some room for imagination