WLFI has made two big moves again. 1. USD1's activity on Binance continues for one month. From April 17th to May 15th, place USD1 in Binance and participate in the weekly allocation of a total of $15 million in WLFI rewards based on the position held. WLFI's continued subsidy activities on Binance are actually borrowing Binance's traffic, user base, and platform influence to promote the mainstream market for USD1. 2. The lock up proposal governance proposal has been launched. The core content is: The team/consultant/institution/partner together hold approximately 45.24 billion WLFIs. If accepting the new plan, burn 10% first, lock the remaining part for 2 years, and then unlock linearly for 3 years. Early supporters locked it for 2 years and then unlocked it linearly for another 2 years. ➤ Those who do not accept will continue to be locked in indefinitely That is to say, if the proposal is passed, 62.28 billion WLFIs (approximately 62% of the total) will not enter the market in the next two years, and 4.52 billion will be permanently destroyed. The initial total quantity of WLFI is 100 billion pieces, which is a bonus for the project and the project party itself. It solves the biggest uncertainty problem before. Previously, many WLFIs were locked, but when to handle them and how to make changes in the future are unclear to the market and remain undecided. This proposal is quite bold, as the lock up, coin burning, and ownership framework have transformed the previously vague lock up state into a more clear long-term release model. The prices for early supporters participating in the two rounds of public sale seem to be $0.015 and $0.05. Starting from September 1, 2025, 20% of the tokens purchased in these two rounds can be unlocked through application. For early support users, extending the proposal for 2 years may not feel very good. Many people are originally looking for profits, but now the redemption time continues to be pushed back. For anyone, it would be very uncomfortable. I am thinking that if WLFI considers the feelings of early supporters more, it would be better not to just extend the lock up period, but to provide additional compensation, future profit distribution, ecological airdrop priority, a softer exit window for early supporters, and a small percentage of early unlocking, etc.