I don’t want to dodge the blame for the CowSwap interface getting compromised. But users ending up on a malicious interface will keep happening—whether through hacked social accounts (it happened even to presidents), malicious Google ads (seriously, Google?), or DNS attacks along the supply chain. So it is important that the wallet offers a second layer of security. If the interface requests a malicious transaction, the user needs to have a high chance to stop it. I am glad that @safe, with “Shield,” is already providing the right warning, and in the upcoming “SafeNet,” it will go beyond warnings and stop such transactions altogether - unless manually overridden by the user with a time delay.(koeppelmann.eth 🦉💳)