Rented hashrate to SIGNAL for a consensus change creates a false illusion of miners desiring to enforce a consensus change So renting hashrate is mostly misleading -- because you are another step removed from consensus enforcement. It's kind of like Paper Bitcoin vs Real Bitcoin. You are actually signalling economic support, in which case a better use of your BTC would be to bet on a prediction market/fork futures. There are reasons to rent hashrate, but they are much more niche and selfishly profit-driven than the anti-economic onus of 110.(cbspears ◉)