This friend's question really leaves me speechless I don't know how many people still have this misunderstanding, so I still want to patiently explain (I could have ignored it). 60000, 46000, I prefer the latter ", these three keywords appear in my three different tweets, each with context and logical reasoning. I really didn't expect it to be understood by such a combination, so in the end it turned into '60000, or 46000, does Murphy lean towards the latter?'? ” I will take screenshots of them separately for everyone to see for themselves: The first article states that 'when BTC approaches this range, it is not advisable to be overly bearish.' Here, it refers to the range! What scope? Of course, the PSIP is in the range of 45-50%. At present, 50% is calculated to be 60000, which means that it is not advisable to be overly bearish after falling below 60000. The second article, the original text says: "If we want to follow the previous pattern, BTC needs to fall to 46000, and I think this pattern is likely to break in this round." May I ask, which sentence did I say that I think we need to reach 46000? What I meant was clearly 'don't think'. If the short-term cost line continues to fall, will BTC break through directly or will it fall below the purple line? I tend towards the latter ", which clearly means that it may fall below the purple line of 64000. Which sentence says it's going to drop to 46000? I really don't understand Is it because my writing skills are too poor, or am I overestimating my friends' comprehension abilities. Why does the combination of Chinese characters create such a significant distortion in meaning, even though they are all written in Chinese characters?