If my “repaving” you mean “reinventing “, yes. One of the challenges is that most corporate knowledge is still in someone’s head. Knowledge is far different than information. LLMs and agents can capture all the information it can touch, internally and externally to the company But there are things that you, me and everyone, security guards, salespeople, whoever, do to make the things we do fit the way we want them to. None of that shit is documented anywhere. You can give LLMs or Agents to employees to improve how they do their jobs. But that isn’t all that much impact for bigger companies. If you want to truly gain from AI, You can’t do it the way it was done, and just add AI. That’s why so many companies have struggled to get a return. Which I think is your point ? You have to reinvent your business to maximize the benefit from the tech. That is hard. There aren’t many CEOs capable of reinventing their company around tech they don’t understand. Nor are there many shareholders in public companies willing to allow them to take that chance. Let me rephrase that. There are ZERO public companies who will at this point, allow the ceo to wing it and reinvent the company around Ai. None. It’s one reason @costplusdrugs has been able to reinvent our manufacturing. We optimize to the technology and train and retrain our employees to fit it. Our public competitors can’t begin to consider what we do. You live this. Curious what you think about the above ?(Mark Cuban)