There are only three things behind everything Interests, interests, his mother interests The Wall Street Journal was originally the mouthpiece of some stubborn old money. It also represents their interests. Full of malice towards the cryptocurrency industry. The black currency circle has not been around for a day or two The Wall Street Journal's own report on the cryptocurrency industry is not the first time it has been found by a court to be false and maliciously published In 2023, The Wall Street Journal published an investigative report on Tether and Bitfinex. In this article, The Wall Street Journal incorporates British businessman Christopher Harborne and his company AML Global into a complete narrative framework. The article suggests that these companies bypass the bank risk control system through shell company structures, forged documents, and other means, providing a financial channel for stablecoin business Harborne and AML Global subsequently filed a defamation lawsuit directly against Dow Jones&Company. After the case enters the judicial process, some key facts quickly change Firstly, following legal action, The Wall Street Journal removed five paragraphs from the article that referred to Harborne and AML Global, and added an editorial note to the article on February 21, 2024. This means that important content related to the parties involved in the original report has been substantially modified Subsequently, the case entered the Delaware Superior Court. The court rejected Dow Jones' motion to withdraw the lawsuit during the trial. The court explicitly stated in the ruling that the complaint has fully claimed that the report is false and has also fully claimed actual malice. That is to say, the court believes that this report is false and may have been maliciously published, so the case must continue to enter the trial stage This is no longer a unilateral denial of the report by the company, but a clear judgment made by the court after reviewing the materials And what recently happened to Binance seems to be the same narrative style The Wall Street Journal claims in its latest report that up to $1.7 billion has flowed through Binance to entities related to Iran, while implying that internal investigations within the platform have been suppressed and related employees have been fired as a result. This type of title is very easy to create panic in the market But Binance subsequently responded publicly, stating that these statements seriously distort the facts. The relevant funds did not originate from Binance, nor did they end up on Binance, but rather flowed through complex on chain paths between multiple institutions, with a small portion ultimately entering wallet addresses believed to be related to Iran. The platform has closed the relevant accounts after identifying the risks and reported to law enforcement agencies Currently, Binance has also filed a lawsuit against The Wall Street Journal regarding related reports When similar incidents occur repeatedly, a problem is actually very clear. The narrative of the media does not equal the entirety of the facts. Especially when it comes to complex financial structures and cross chain fund flows, a simple title can easily obscure what really happened The Wall Street Journal has been ruled by the court to be false about Tether and Bitfinex, with malicious links published https://law. (justia.com)/cases/delaware/superior-court/2024/n24c-02-292.html? utm_source=(chatgpt.com)