Plume's article is actually very important, and the release time is also very coincidental. Unfortunately, 'too few people have discovered it'. If 2026 is really the first year of RWA outbreak, then we should all take a serious look at this article. Because it clarifies one thing: the core of RWA is not 'putting everything on chain', but rather - what is truly suitable for being on chain. When many people mention RWA, they think of houses, gold, art pieces, farms... So what's the difference between this and previous NFTs? @ The viewpoint of plumenetwork is very clear: what is truly suitable for on chain is not physical assets, but securities. Not assets that appear valuable, but financial rights with legal recognition, standard pricing, and clear delivery structures. in other words: Clear ownership There is a mature regulatory framework in place Standardized Valuation (NAV) Naturally transferable This type of asset is the RWA that is easy to deliver, easy to map, and easy to scale. Blockchain is not used to create ownership, but to improve efficiency. That's also why: NYSE starts tokenizing securities Animoca emphasizes clear regulation SEC discusses innovation exemptions Plume focuses on betting on securities structure All directions are on the same line. ✅ Summary in one sentence: The ultimate goal of RWA is not to bring the real world onto the chain, but to make securities the fundamental source of on chain capital markets. So I think this article is about the underlying logic of the future, not the hot topics.