Is the SSS strategy of DLMM really an unbeatable strategy? The so-called SSS strategy is a name I came up with: Single Side SOL Strategy. In other words, it's a single-sided Bid-Ask strategy for SOL. For example: You spot some random meme coin, let's call it DOG, and you want to add liquidity on DLMM to earn fees. Generally speaking, you have two options: 1. Dual-sided liquidity 2. Single-sided liquidity Dual-sided means a 50/50 split of SOL/DOG (or you can customize the ratio). The advantage is that when you add liquidity equally, no matter if the price goes up or down, you can earn fees. The downside is: if the meme coin drops one-sidedly (which happens a lot), your losses can be significant. Single-sided means you only add one type of token. For example, either SOL or the meme coin. If you only add SOL, it’s essentially a DCA (Dollar Cost Averaging) buy-in strategy—buying more as the price drops. If you only add the meme coin, it’s a DCA sell-off strategy—selling more as the price rises. This is basically an enhanced version of DCA, where you earn fees as extra compensation during the passive buying and selling process. Now that we’ve laid the groundwork, let’s get to the main point: the SSS strategy. Bid Ask Single Side SOL. What a ridiculously long name. Some guy overseas calls it the "Heart Attack Strategy." Yeah, pretty fitting. Because this is basically a strategy where you’re catching falling knives with your bare hands. In Chinese, we should call it: The Super Bagholder Strategy. I tested it for two days, and the win rate isn’t bad. Why? Because your risk exposure is lower (though you do sacrifice some profit potential), but of course, it’s not risk-free. As I said earlier, this is a bagholder strategy, so if you insist on using it for coins that are obviously going to RUG you, not even a god can save you. In the next part, I’ll do a detailed comparison and rational evaluation of the regular dual-sided strategy versus this bagholder strategy.