[U.S. Supreme Court Reviews "Trump v. Federal Reserve Cook" Case, Questions Boundaries of White House's Stance] Odaily Planet Daily News: During the U.S. Supreme Court's review of the "Trump v. Federal Reserve Cook" case today, Chief Justice Roberts asked: If Cook made an "unintentional error" in mortgage materials, where are the boundaries of the White House's stance? Whether it was an unintentional error or a fraudulent act to secure better interest rates, does it make no difference to the White House? On what grounds can it be determined that the Federal Reserve is an administrative agency, thereby concluding that the President indeed has the authority to dismiss its officials? (Jin10)