qinbafrank|1月 13, 2026 01:22
These three reports can splice the story behind the prosecution of criminal investigation Powell by the Ministry of Justice: Pirow led, Pult pushed the boat along the current, Trump took advantage of the situation to make trouble, Besant was very angry, and Tillis strongly opposed.
1. According to an official from the Department of Justice, US prosecutor Jenny Pirlo's office sent a letter to FBI staff in December last year seeking a meeting or phone call opportunity, and followed up about 10 days later. As of last Thursday, no response had been received, and the prosecutor obtained a subpoena authorized by the grand jury the next day. (According to a source familiar with the matter, these emails were sent during the holiday period and did not contain any sense of urgency or mention any criminal investigation.)
2. Bloomberg said that Poort, the director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA), was the key figure in promoting the investigation. Poort claimed that he had no right to interfere with the action of the Ministry of Justice. Previously, Trump had been behind policies such as promoting long-term housing loans and purchasing MBS from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. According to another insider, Bill Platt, the head of the housing finance regulatory agency, recently met with President Trump at Mar-a-Lago and showed him a simulated "wanted poster" for Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell. Pratt listed some possible scenarios for investigating Powell - which Trump is very interested in. Trump was very enthusiastic about Powell and did not mind following the trend.
3. CNN reported on Sunday evening that Beckett had an emergency call with Trump, expressing "displeasure" with the investigation and warning that it could disrupt financial markets and prevent Powell, who may have stepped down after nominating a new Federal Reserve chairman, from leaving early. then
Insiders say that Beckett believed Powell would leave after the president nominated a new Fed chairman. But it won't happen now. Now (Powell) has become even more firm in his stance and messed things up.
4. What will happen next?
For example, it was said yesterday that Trump took advantage of the situation to make trouble at the core for Powell to resign from the board of directors and leave the Federal Reserve completely after the end of his term of office as chairman, but he did not really want to send Powell people to court.
Yesterday, Republican Senator Tillis, a member of the Senate Banking Committee, stated that he will oppose the confirmation of any Federal Reserve nominee until the legal issues surrounding Powell are fully resolved. Tillis' opposition may slow down or prevent Trump's Federal Reserve candidate from being confirmed by the Senate. Because the Federal Reserve candidate nominated by the President must be confirmed by the Senate.
If Tillis is tough, it means that before and after Trump formally nominates the new chairman of the Federal Reserve, Piro's investigation will be terminated, otherwise the nomination of the new chairman will not be passed in the Senate.
In the end, this criminal investigation is likely to end abruptly.
From what I can see, Besent is still very calm and objective:
In the past 25 years, Trump has been a pioneer in tariff and Sino US issues. Who brought it back.
In the past 26 years, Trump should be radical in the issues of people's livelihood and affordability, hoping that Besant will still be the one who can balance the demands of all parties and stabilize the situation.
It is estimated that Trump will have to hit the south wall (another form of TACO) several times on the issue of "people's livelihood and affordability" to feel the value of Besant.
Share To
Timeline
HotFlash
APP
X
Telegram
CopyLink