Tinkle 🔶🦞🧑🍳⚡|Dec 21, 2025 18:20
I want to clarify something and tell the truth.
NoFx has been an open-source community project from the beginning, not for financing or company operations. My original intention has always been to be an open, fair, and jointly built AI trading tool community by the community and contributors.
I have been immersed in developing data products and maintaining communities over the years. Personally, I have almost no experience in financing, equity, or company structure, and I have never considered turning an open source community into a commercial chip.
In the early stages of the project, there were indeed people in the community who took the initiative to "help with financing", "for better development", and "establish a company".
At that time, I knew almost nothing about these things, but out of trust, I cooperated with the relevant procedures and even used my personal credit card to pay for the related fees. I have never actively pursued financing, nor have I participated in any transfer of benefits or kickbacks.
It wasn't until a series of events later that I gradually realized that my ideal community and the other party's actual direction of promotion were not consistent; As someone who only wants to write good code, I have been caught up in a situation that I am not familiar with and have never actively chosen.
This experience was not easy for me personally. I am neither good at arguing nor at defending myself in public opinion.
But I know one thing: NoFx does not belong to any individual, it belongs to all community members who have truly contributed their energy, time, and trust.
It should be clarified that:
1. NoFx has never confirmed, accepted, or used any external investment funds, and has only received early incubation guidance from some institutions. I have always been grateful, but project development and decision-making are entirely driven independently by the community and core team.
2. The statements about "financing failure," "divestment," "kickbacks," "benefit transmission," and "creating public opinion for financing purposes" that appear on the internet are all untrue.
I have never personally participated in, instructed, or accepted any financing related benefit transfer activities.
As an open source community, NoFx is not the private property of any individual or single institution. It comes from the code, documentation, and mutual assistance of numerous contributors. My original intention has always been to focus on building an open, fair, and community driven AI trading tool community, rather than being influenced by any financing, commercial arrangements, or external interests. I should also return to my original intention and focus on the code, product, and community, rather than being blinded by the intentions of others.
Currently, all matters involving personal disputes, commercial disputes, and false accusations,
It has been handed over to a professional team of lawyers for handling.
I would like to reiterate that NoFx is an open source community project that does not belong to any individual, and does not aim for financing, valuation, or capital narrative. It will not be financed as a company in the future.
What we are concerned about is the fairness, openness, and community collaboration of AI trading tools.
I will continue to focus all my energy on code, products, and community, bringing valuable tools to every contributor and user.
Thanks for your understanding.
Share To
Timeline
HotFlash
APP
X
Telegram
CopyLink