The most difficult part of many NFT projects at the beginning is not the technology, but the cold start phase where no one dares to take the initiative. Everyone is waiting for liquidity, and as a result, liquidity is also waiting for people, which is a typical vicious cycle. @Spaace_io's design in this regard is actually quite 'realistic'. It does not expect users to make large transactions immediately, but rather amplifies the value of every small action made by early participants through Dynamic Fee Model and Liquidity Routing. Even small bids and tentative pending orders can truly impact market depth, rather than being drowned out in the background like some platforms. This design is essentially a slow process of warming up the market. More importantly, its Cross Market Aggregation does not rely solely on its own liquidity to support itself, but also incorporates external market price signals to avoid the false prosperity of "playing with oneself". This is very important for judging real demand and also makes price discovery closer to real market sentiment. From the results, @ spaace_io seems more like building a "naturally growing market structure" rather than relying on subsidizing data. You can feel that trading is not being pushed away, but slowly forming a rhythm. Many platforms pursue explosive growth, while Spaace is more like laying the foundation. In the short term, it may not be the liveliest, but once market sentiment warms up, this structure is actually easier to catch real traffic