If you still have hope for the Infofi track, @ Punk9277's thought-provoking article is always worth referencing. I agree with some of his viewpoints: ~~~~~~~~~ Worldwide, distribution is becoming increasingly decentralized - shifting from paying for platforms to paying for creators This is not only in Web3, but also in Web2, where creators will become increasingly valuable. Once you had no income after uploading videos on YouTube, and once you had no income after publishing articles on X. The early KOLs of Web3 were also, and even had little status -- Two cycles ago, I couldn't even invest in slightly better projects, but in this cycle, my investment opportunities have significantly improved. The status of KOLs in the industry has significantly increased, which is also reflected in the Web2 industry, and everyone may feel it. ~~~~~~~~~ The challenge in the industry has become how to identify and encourage true human creators after AI, as we can see AI generated content spread across all platforms The rise of AI has reduced the marginal cost of content to almost zero, which will inevitably make it increasingly difficult to find high-quality content. So in the future, there will still be a market for "soulful" content creators, and in the short term, I don't think they will be easily replaced by AI. AI can be used to provide assistance such as data collection, but do not simply copy it. ~~~~~~~~~~ I do believe that content creation requires a minimum threshold in terms of social influence or on chain usage. In web2, this is done through review and interviews. In web3, perhaps due to the completely permissionless spirit, some teams choose to have no threshold at all. " This is also one of the places where many people criticize Kaito, because some people say that they have been working hard for a long time without getting any results. I believe Kaito has a reason for setting the threshold, but the previous difficulty was not disclosing the threshold and being afraid of being exploited by bots to quickly break through the defense line. @Punk9277 said it will introduce an indicator called "follower net worth" for upgrading, which is indeed an interesting attempt and has a chance of success. Because you will undoubtedly find that wealthy tycoons are more difficult to be bought off. You can spend a few thousand yuan to buy tens of thousands of followers, but you can't spend the same amount of money to buy @ cz_pinance's followers, nor can you buy mine ， For MCN institutions and Ai Bot bulk operators, the cost has also increased significantly. So it seems a bit reliable to judge by paying attention to the total wealth level of your people's wallets. When the content you produce is too poor, your fans will be removed, and the total wealth of your followers will also decrease, thereby affecting your Rank. ~~~~~~~~~~ We encourage other platforms to be equally strict: -Reply doesn't count -Reputation threshold for quality control -Strict reduction of engagement and group brushing volume -Weekly contribution limit for tweets to reduce incentives for quantity These improvements are quite good, but the difficult part now is how to help users effectively convert Kaito's accumulated reputation into profits, especially in situations where the market is low and project parties are unwilling to fulfill their obligations. I can understand the recent drop in Kaito's coin price, as the overall path of converting "attention" into money has encountered problems - there are fewer TGE projects, and even if TGE is successful, the effect is not very good, which further leads to the project wanting to control the funding and giving less chips. The market has peaks and valleys, and now Kaito needs to focus on how to polish itself and how to better utilize the valuable large amount of data in its hands. After the next wave of TGE market, it will be even more indispensable to all parties in the industry. Hope @ KaitoAI continues to evolve, InfoFi flag bearer doesn't fall