The model of OstiumLabs is very clear, not driven by traffic, but by structural efficiency. Its logic is very clear: The more traditional the assets are, the more sensitive they are to liquidation and risk control; The more transparent the chain is, the higher the requirements for the model; To connect two worlds, it must rely on infrastructure, not UI @What OstiumLabs is currently doing is not to 'create a more dazzling perpetual trading platform', but to attempt to dismantle the traditional market infrastructure - market distribution, risk exposure, and clearing structure - and then reassemble it with on chain logic The most crucial point is that it uses a Synthetic Settlement Layer. This is not simply about generating synthetic assets, but rather abstracting the "settlement" itself into a programmable module, allowing different asset classes (precious metals, foreign exchange, indices) to run under the same clearing framework Another aspect that has not been fully discussed is the Position Netting Engine that is currently being tested internally. Simply put, it means netting positions with multiple assets, directions, and accounts to reduce liquidation pressure and systemic risk. This is the daily operation of traditional market futures exchanges, but not many can do it on the chain If its self-developed clearing layer and risk control module can really run stably, then it is not like a "trading product", but more like a "prototype of CME on the chain" @OstiumLabs @Bantr_fun @0xMantleCN Ostium Bantr