Selfless dedication to the best hedging @ MemeMax_Fi reward strategy. Hope you all bookmark it (Project team, don't kill me) But I have a mysterious god who helped me open up 110000 U of M So the question is, how can I get the reward without losing the principal? The 'conservative version plan' is suitable for small accounts (the conclusion of the expert is that this reward is not intended for big players, but I still hope that big players can create a script to reward them) Let me emphasize the premise: The essence of this type of 'brushing transaction fees for rewards' is to exchange a certain cost for an uncertain return. It may also be defined by the platform as "brushing volume" or "abusing activities", with the risk of account suspension/clearing rewards, so be sure to read the rules carefully. (Waiting for the project party to provide specific rules) The following is just a deduction: accounting+risk framework, don't be brainless. Step 0: Set a risk budget first First, let's think of two numbers: How much real gold and silver can I bear to lose at most? For example, a maximum loss of 300u (combined with transaction fees and contract losses). Is the activity 'worth playing' under this loss limit? For example, if you expect to receive at least 600-1000u of M reward, then consider the expected rise and fall of M. Without these two numbers, the rest is just empty talk. Step 1: Create an example of a 'cardinality' A more secure framework, you can modify: Total risk budget: 300u (psychologically acceptable as a loss) Operating accounts: 2-3 small accounts (to avoid excessive rewards for single accounts leading to skyrocketing transaction fees) Target reward for each account: not exceeding 300-500u Transaction principal: Actual contract principal per account: 100u Leverage: 50-75 times (don't really go to the limit of 100 times) Single position ≈ 5000-7500u Assuming the handling fee is approximately 0.04-0.05% per transaction (open or flat side), roughly calculated as 0.08-0.1% for one in one out: Each transaction fee ≈ 5000u × 0.1%=5u (just for illustration) To unlock a 300u reward, a 150u handling fee is required Approximately 30 orders are required (30 × 5u=150u) The key is: You need to earn at least 5u per transaction to not eat the principal. Step 2: Design a very simple 'contract technique' A simplified strategy for "brushing transaction fees" (not a high win rate holy grail, just reducing volatility): Variety: BTC Perpetual Contract Good depth and small sliding point, suitable for frequent entry and exit. Time frame: 1-minute/5-minute candlestick Only make small fluctuations that follow the trend, not hard and just fluctuating. Entry logic (schematic version): The 5-minute moving average of the price station plus an increase in trading volume, following the short trend to open higher; Open short when there is a significant increase in volume below the moving average; Do not create an unstable and unstable middle zone. Appearance logic: Profit taking is very close: For example, if the price goes out in your direction by 0.15-0.25%, it will immediately level off. The goal is to earn a profit slightly higher than the transaction fee per order. Stop loss is also close: Walk in the opposite direction by 0.15-0.2% and immediately cut. It must not be dragged into a big loss. Rhythm control: Stop losing 2-3 orders immediately and take a break for a period of time. Limit trading time to 1-2 hours per day and avoid emotional outbursts. In this way, you only follow the small fluctuations of short trends: When successful, earn a 'small sum of money', When failing, lose a small negative of a few units, Try to keep profits and losses close to the level of transaction fees. ➫➬ Sincere reminder on the last few points You must first carefully read the official rules (I believe the project team will definitely change the rules) especially: 1. Is there a restriction on self trading/high-frequency brushing volume 2. Are there any clauses that may cancel rewards for "abnormal transactions" Once judged as a violation, it is likely to be: loss of principal+loss of handling fees+loss of rewards. Treat it as a 'game' rather than a 'profit arbitrage' The essence of logic is: By determining the transaction fee and bearing the risk of contract fluctuations, Go and strive for the potential returns of M's future rise or fall. So: The goal is not to make money from the contract, but to cover the transaction fees first and then look at M's long-term performance. If you already feel that it's not worth it, isn't it That usually means: Either the reward is too little, Either risk control cannot achieve it, Either one's own state is not suitable for high-frequency leverage. At this point, 'participating less or even not participating' is often the most rational choice. Crik - crik @ MemeCore_ORG @MemeX_MRC20 @KaitoAI @MeCo_ICE MemeX MemeCore M KAITO @Wanamaker_X stM