OKB is underestimated. In "The Great Ming Dynasty 1566," Emperor Jiajing said, "Clouds are in the blue sky, water is in the bottle, and everything has its place. In my opinion, OKB followed the same long-term logic of not going to court in the 27th year of the Jiajing reign, but firmly establishing its position by controlling the economic lifeline and using checks and balances. OKX destroyed 65.257 million OKBs at once, with a total supply of 21 million. Prior to this, OKX had already destroyed approximately 279 million OKBs, worth about $26 billion, and would repurchase and destroy them every quarter with a 30% handling fee For an exchange and a long-term profitable group, this operation is a bit like Emperor Jiajing's inclusion of the income of Jiangnan Weaving Bureau into the internal treasury, not for short-term gains, but for long-term control of the core. The path of any power struggle is not smooth, and OKB is no exception. At present, it maintains a high correlation of 0.85 with Bitcoin, and the fluctuations of BTC will be directly transmitted to OKB. Although the new policies in the long river of history have gone through impeachment and smear, they ultimately led to a surge in treasury deposits, laying the foundation for a prosperous era. The undervaluation of OKB is essentially the result of most people indulging in short-term games and ignoring long-term power struggles. The laws of history have never changed: Jiajing used checks and balances to consolidate imperial power, Yongzheng used new policies to reshape the dynasty. I believe that the short-term price fluctuations of OKB are just temporary noise in the process of power struggle. The value of OKB will eventually emerge as the ultimate answer to power planning and layout over time. okb