i think bitcoiners agree on most bitcoin mission things . where we may disagree and hopefully converge is the question about which tactics will win best. and those disagreements are wider when they are complex and relate to the lower level details or longer duration/2nd order risks, because those are harder to understand, harder to predict or require knowledge of wider things. i believe it's the same with most people arguing on twitter at root, they're only arguing because they care about bitcoin's long term robustness as a new hope for humanity. even varied people from @lukedashjr @saylor @jimmysong @jameslavish and without question sipa, greg maxwell, and ofc the protocol developers working on bitcon maintenance and security. yes people will say snarky or emphatic things, but it's only because they care about the mission! useful to remember that for context.(Adam Back)