really @UXLINKoffical was the IDO UXLINK that I thought was worth squatting on last year. Other SocialFi projects are all "issuing coins → attracting people → running away", leaving a mess of chicken feathers. UXLINK and his team have taken the opposite approach, directly tying 65% of the tokens and the goal of 100 million users together. The meaning is: without the user, the token cannot be moved. Teams, investors, and users, no one can go solo. It's like tying oneself to the guillotine, betting on whether growth can escape. Of course, in the early days, prices were like riding a roller coaster. It's not surprising that there was too little circulation and lack of confidence. But precisely because of this, once user growth really starts, the rebound will be rocket like. @XerpaAI The question is - can one billion users reach it? Don't say it, this matter is quite difficult. Web3 has high recruitment costs and complex paths. UXLINK is currently following three lines: one ️⃣ Recommended acquaintances (social graph) two ️⃣ Mini program fission three ️⃣ FujiPay Consumer Card Especially for FujiPay, if it really succeeds, it will be equivalent to connecting crypto with daily consumption, and the scene will be implemented, which is not purely speculative. Compared to Friend Tech and Lens, UXLINK is clearly more 'desperate'. Lens is playing with ecological construction, FT is playing with short-term popularity, and UXLINK directly binds token economy and user growth in depth, with success or failure visible on the chain. So personally, I think this thing is a typical "time for space" and worth keeping an eye on. Becoming SocialFi is the new paradigm, and losing is also the touchstone of the track.