After taking a few days off, I came back to look at the viral post I missed. Among them, @ jasonjzhao's post about quitting full-time work at @ StoryProtocol caused a huge uproar, with 5 million views and nearly a thousand comments. The focus of the debate is that one of the main leaders announced his withdrawal after the successful TGE of the project, and his withdrawal was announced at the end of the token lock up period. This coincidence reminds many people that he may have cashed out or prepared to cash out tokens at the moment when the lock up was released, thus "withdrawing" from the project to cash out. As a former serial entrepreneur, I partially understand Jason's approach because everyone's abilities and interests are limited, and being able to take a project from 0 to 1 and from 1 to 10, or from 10 to 100, does not focus on the same direction of ability. 0-1 requires more imaginative creativity, sharp market insight, strong/explosive infectivity, and small team cohesion, while 1-100 requires steady operational ability, patience with daily ups and downs, and persistent budgeting. I myself belong to the former category, and if I have to carefully plan and operate every day, it will be unbearable. I always look for a reliable partner to make up for this shortcoming. There are also many friends around me who are obsessed with the 0-1 aspect in traditional industries, and after the initial success of their business, they exit or sell it, and then find a direction they are interested in to start from scratch again. @Jason JZhao's announcement has caused such a big stir, and one important thing is that many people in the Web3 industry associate it with the fact that there are many people who specialize in coin issuance and harvesting, and they always come back with unfinished projects after TGE. This is indeed a stubborn problem in the industry. The timing of his announcement of withdrawal is still open to debate, and if it is later, it may be more ideal to be more low-key. However, to be honest, @ StoryProtocol currently sees that SY is still (already a big boss), and after six months, the coin price can still reach ATH. It has also sold at a high price on the coin stock market, which is quite right for retail investors and VCs. The IP is different from the all staff Rug project that everyone despises. There are many projects that have plummeted by more than 90% online, right? Can you find me some ATH capable ones? Anyway, I think I still want to participate in Jason's next project. I just checked and found out that his new project Poseidon has received a $15 million seed round investment from @ a16z on July 23rd. The direction is to address one of the most pressing and overlooked issues in artificial intelligence: accessing high-quality, usable, and legally licensed training data. And the $1500 seed destined this to be another big project. I hope the big Vs who are now standing on the moral high ground cursing Jason and foaming at him won't come back and lick Poseidon again