✍️ Several cruel truths about 'mouth slapping' Early this morning, Kaito founder @ Punk9277 released a public statement about the Humanity incident, which contains a lot of information. Click here to view: Finally, Kaito strongly recommends that all project parties assign Kaito the final allocation of Yappers and Kaito ecology. This means that Kaito has no say in the airdrop allocation of the project, and the final airdrop scope and amount are entirely determined by the project party. Kaito is only responsible for providing data throughout the entire process and does not participate in allocation decisions. It's not difficult to understand why many Chinese bloggers on the Story list initially had no success and no way to appeal. Coincidentally, Curry Chain uses Kaito data to create exclusive rankings, manually removing users who post Fud comments or participate in multiple projects. The above reflects several cruel truths about the mouth rubbing track for reference: one ⃣ The project party holds the power of life and death The proportion of airdrops, who to airdrop to, and any additional conditions are entirely determined by the project team, and third parties including Kaito have no right to interfere. Ultimately, the project team spent 150000 US dollars just to launch @ KaitoAI, not including the cost of collaborating with top Yapper privately. If someone really spends money, they naturally have to hold the power of distribution in their own hands, even if they have some rat traps, it is understandable. two ⃣ Fud=incorrect values=not eligible to receive airdrops Such cases abound. Any words you post that are detrimental to the project (even constructive suggestions) will be judged by AI as having incorrect values, and you will be removed from all rankings. This is actually quite funny. Twitter, as the largest communication and dissemination platform in the encryption industry, has now become a "praise forum" for project parties. Is this the "decentralization" that you have worked hard to build? three ⃣ Some project parties may target those who engage in 'one bite, multiple thrusts' Curry chain won't be an isolated case. Although I really dislike Ah San, I somewhat agree with his point of view that other projects will follow the example of Curry Chain and manually eliminate those who are prone to "one bite, multiple hits". In recent months, there have been more and more people participating in lip syncing, with many of them being on more than 10 project lists at the same time. If it rises to the level of values, this is a typical lack of loyalty. These data are publicly available for inspection, and it's easy for the project team to ban you.