As a deep player and researcher of Infofi, I have been paying attention to and considering whether the mindshare revolution brought by the current leader @ KaitoAI can be better, such as improving the meaningless "echo wall" style content emissions that farmers use to harvest. The current Yapping motivation is more inclined towards "praise" and "long articles" rather than objective discussions, after all, the purpose of Yappers writing articles is to have more airdrops, and writing objectively when there is nothing to do will affect the results? This is also one of the root causes of recent doubts about the credibility of CT Twitter content. I quite like @ anymose96 on this point. At least he is the first KOL I have seen actively testing @ Mira-Network Klok and publicly raising questions. The founder of the attack has come down to distinguish and respond, which is a great criticism 😂😂 ~~~~~~~~~~ Today, there was a lot of content about Yala on the Twitter timeline. Upon closer inspection, @ yalaorg also noticed possible hydrological issues with "mouth rubbing" and created their own Yap plan to try and improve it. Regardless of the final effect of this social practice, it should provide some reference for the future development of the Infofi track. To be honest, I haven't fully tried Yala's product and completed the DD yet, but let me summarize their rules for voice rewards: 1. Not involved in farming. Not registered. Just publish valuable content and it will be heard and recorded. So it seems like there is a set of its own social media content evaluation system? 2. The content can be Yala's honest views on their BTC strategy, whether good or bad, even if it may hurt the project team if spoken out. They listed a series of samples, such as writing tutorials, creating dashboards, creating $Yu token ideas, how to mint, and so on. 3. Don't forget to ask @ yalaorg and $Yu, and you can also download their snowman goggles and create them. The portal for detailed rule articles is here: https://(x.com)/yalaorg/status/1938547105112715586 ~~~~~~~~~~ Of course, after reading it, there are still some issues: 1. Yala has not announced how much of the tokens will be distributed through their Yeti Yell system - there is a possibility of expected backlash. The recent uproar over @ okiedotfun's Spark is due to a lack of clarity. 2. The team said to secretly track Mindshare and not make it public. It's crucial how this is done. The intern responsible for recording during Virtuals was exhausted 😂😂😂 I don't think they have the energy to create a system like @ KaitoAI. So it's a bit pure black box centralization. 3. How to judge whether everyone's voice is meaningful, based on insight rather than noise. How to evaluate the influence between the voices of small accounts and big KOLs. Simply put, how does the fairness of this algorithm manifest. So my suggestion is: 1. We do not release real-time Mindshare rankings, but we need results periodically. Otherwise, it is very likely that participants will give up after a period of time without receiving feedback on their efforts, which is human nature. 2. It is necessary to disclose the proportion of chips that the team plans to use as rewards for this social practice. There have been too many examples in the past of using airdrop PUAs but not clearly stating the final backlash. Even big third-party platforms like @ KaitoAI can be stripped off by shameless garbage @ Humanityprot, let alone self created. 3. If you feel that complete disclosure contradicts the original intention of your own event, can you add a third-party notary system to allow some industry experts who are perceived as credible to assist in understanding the details of the rules in advance and objectively evaluate/endorse them? Because what everyone fears most is unfairness, non-compliance, and opacity. ~~~~~~~~~~~~· In my opinion, the underlying of Infofi is not technology, but human nature. @ KaitoAI may not currently be the best solution, but at least it is relatively balanced and still actively improving. @The original intention of the yalaorg gameplay is also good, but there also needs to be better mechanisms to interrogate through human nature. The first step is to trust the foundation: how can we retail investors believe that you will always be as righteous and bright as we shout? It's easier said than done. @Yalaorg looks forward to seeing your answers