Did the clown sit up in my dream and surprise me? Waking up in the morning, I figured out what @ VaderResearch had to say. Currently, the entire community is shrouded in the haze of "deception, manipulation, and dumping". The mood in the community is very low now, and everyone is working hard just for that point. In the end, individual investors are not only the "fuel" for large investors, but also feel more like they are being sold and helping people make money. In fact, the reason why Ponzi is willing to participate is because they are interested in the so-called "transparency" and "fairness". At the beginning, the wealth creation effect of points may have become abnormal since the expansion of points. In terms of returning to this cycle, early users who invested in virtual have already recovered their investment, and some "paper hands" have even earned a lot after participating in some high magnification projects. Currently, for users who invest in virtual, the recovery cycle takes three months or even longer. Most users choose to pledge virtual and VADER according to the pace of the community. This pledge is actually a trust, and everyone hopes for a good community. At least no one wants the flywheel to come to a halt. To be frank, I think the area where we are currently doing well is that the project team is making changes. The process of listening to community feedback and promptly fixing erroneous issues can be considered very efficient in terms of problem-solving time. Basically, it can also address the issue of community voice. It can also provide satisfactory answers to most people. However, opaque factors still exist, and everyone knows that Yapping's integral ratio has been gradually decreasing recently. In the process of integral inflation, the DAB integral actually accounts for the largest proportion. We certainly know that liquidity is needed, but liquidity is not just about locking users in. Retail investors with high collateral and low liquidity are unlikely to fail, but the continuous decline in coin prices is always problematic. I personally think that instead of saying 'inflation' according to the current model, it is better to deflate according to a fixed quota. The daily fixed points are classified according to the weight of different categories, and the scores are cleared to zero during the cycle. Everyone may receive less points. However, if the proportion of scores during a certain period is consistent, the current situation can be improved. The proportion of total points is relatively easy to calculate, and the remaining points of projects during the cycle will be more 'transparent'. In addition, LP's point income can be added, which not only pledges their project tokens, but also reduces systemic risks by adding liquidity. Make the bottom pool thicker and make prices more stable. After all, it takes 14 days for everyone from staking to unlocking. No one can predict what will happen during this time period. To be honest, I really hope that virtual @ VaderyAI_ can come forward to restore the "truth" of this incident and make the community more transparent.