anymose🐦‍⬛ 🔆
anymose🐦‍⬛ 🔆|Jun 10, 2025 04:39
How wild are the notes on the takeaway order .. Sooner or later, I will be laughed to death in the delivery order notes! I've been watching videos these days and I've seen many people ordering takeout and writing strange things in the comments section. Some are funny, some are heartwarming, and some are really causing trouble! Someone really made it big and even provoked the police! Let's sneak in! ⬇️ The school doesn't allow ordering takeout. There is a security guard at the entrance. Don't wear a knight's uniform. Don't speak when you arrive, just stand there. I'll call you dad, you call me a good son, just give me the food Good guy picked up a son for nothing. This is quite reliable. There was also a woman who wrote in the remarks, "Do you know about subject one 95?" The rider was scared and quickly called the police. When the police arrived, they found out that she had made a mistake. This woman really scored 95 points in subject one, but she was excited and left a note without anyone to share. The rider thought it was a distress signal asking, "Can you save me The abuse of notes on the order has been very verified, affecting the normal delivery. This situation is the same on the Bitcoin network. OP-RETURN is a note information that can be added during Bitcoin transactions. In a transaction, you can attach metadata, timestamps, protocol information, etc. and send them together. Why was OP-RETURN initially limited to 80 bytes by Bitcoin Core? Similar to this food delivery system, Bitcoin trading itself is a busy delivery system, and if everyone adds a bunch of notes, the overall efficiency will be greatly reduced. However, this restriction has precisely sparked the sexual interest of some "creative" geeks (no, it's just interest). They believe that breaking through the limitations of OP-RETURN is cool and a precious art, so they: Disguised content Since the remarks section can only be written in 80 words, my cleverness is to put an entire diary in a takeaway bag and create a fake address output. This method can exceed 80 words, but fake addresses cannot be delivered, and the warehouse is becoming more and more "garbage", that is, the UTXO set is expanding, occupying valuable space for nothing. Bribery of Riders This is a blatant bribe. Someone directly approached the rider and said, 'Can you help me put this big note into the takeout bag? I'll give you a tip.'. Some riders refuse, but there may be some who agree, so large notes that do not comply with the rules are also placed in the block for trading. Rare Pepe, Runes, Stampd, and other familiar projects are all based on OP-RETURN, covering NFTs, tokens and meta protocols, timestamp proofs, and more. So for this matter, you have a good plan. He has a wall ladder, and the restrictions cannot be restricted. It's better to just let go. On the 5th of last month, Bitcoin Core announced the lifting of the OP-RETURN restriction in the next version update, allowing for the embedding of larger data and allowing for multiple OP-RETURN outputs. Note that this change belongs to the adjustment of "standard rules" rather than "consensus rules", so it will not affect the legitimacy of the block, and the 4MB block size limit still exists. Node operators can choose not to upgrade or use alternative implementations such as Bitcoin Knots to maintain stricter policies. / Yesterday, Bitcoin Core issued a statement titled 'Bitcoin Core Development and Trading Relay Policy', which caused a major earthquake in the Bitcoin community. Press? What happened? Bitcoin has divided into several factions around OP-RETURN, or even larger junk trading. The moderate faction believes that since it cannot be restricted, it is better to turn it into a rule, while the opposition directly pushes the filter and kills everyone. So, fundamentally, everyone is trying to reduce the pollution of the Bitcoin network, but their ideas and methods are different. Bitcoin Core recommends that traders voluntarily send their transactions to a relay instead of directly entering the miner's P2P node. This can prevent dust attacks, eliminate disguised addresses, and speed up transactions. Opponents believe that beating around or being knee weak, pandering to miners rather than being loyal to users, and garbage should be completely killed. The debate is still ongoing, but what's really impressive is Bitcoin's full decentralization. Although the Bitcoin Core client, which advocates relay, occupies the vast majority of the market, Bitcoin is a user-defined network. If you also think that inscriptions are garbage, you can choose Knots and join the garbage filtering war. // Controversy and debate are a stable state of progress. Personally, I support moderate factions, lifting restrictions, and allowing users to choose their own network or use relay services.. Just like food delivery order notes, there are also heartwarming contents. I see another note: I ordered it for my husband, make sure it's signed for by a man. If it's a woman, call me immediately and tell that little bitch to wait for me Look, a harmonious society is so great! This is a soft core science popularization article, through which you can have a partial understanding of the following knowledge: What is OP-RETURN What is the debate about relay schemes How to catch mistresses through notes (not necessarily) Author: Anymose | A Soft Core Science Popularization Writer <End of Full Text>
+3
Mentioned
Share To

Timeline

HotFlash

APP

X

Telegram

Facebook

Reddit

CopyLink

Hot Reads