🚨 Just sold! 90x LOUD profit, this one is comfortable The image is not intended as a reference It only took one day to turn 35 dollars into 2800 dollars, and the actual return rate was 9000%. Why did I start contributing time to slap my mouth when others didn't take action? Because I understood 👌 Later on, I found that there was a big discrepancy between what I had imagined and what I had been thinking. The economic model and chip structure were both on the verge of collapse, and perhaps this time it was different from what Ultra had imagined ⬇️🧵 Loud's model is indeed different from what I had imagined A transaction tax of 0.8% and a handling fee of 18% are distributed to the pledger, which appears to be a scheme. Using the influence of the top 1000 to test purchasing power, the result shows that they cannot even surpass 30M. What is the problem? Firstly, there are flaws in the chip structure. Early release is too fast, which makes the price unsustainable. 40% IAO and 45% liquidity mean that you cannot use FDV to view projects. This kind of plate, which is already close to full circulation, cannot be accepted by anyone If you don't sell for $35 and earn $100, what about earning $1000? What about 2000? No one would refuse a profit close to 100x The economic model is even more problematic, with a top 25 profit sharing fee and an 8% tax, resulting in a fluctuating rate of 16%. It has significant wear and tear and does not conform to any form of high-frequency trading This design is destined to be unsustainable in the long run. If Ultra plans to make a launchpad in the future, like he used to, I think it will be equally difficult. Previously, I thought the IAO+launchpad model was very good, but if the first Taizi coin cannot run out+this shitty model=crash failure Because: 1. The traffic entry still relies on the KOL kidnapping mechanism 2. The project screening criteria are still vague 3. The fee sharing model is essentially a form of commission rebate What is even more fatal is the contradiction in the underlying logic - maintaining the attention rate to attract strikes, while also controlling the collapse, which cannot be achieved under the current mechanism. Looking at Kaito's recent data, it can be seen that the frequency of new project launches has significantly slowed down, indicating problems on the upstream supply side. Essentially, the problem with this round of structural changes is that there is no money in the upstream, no money in the downstream, and all the money is in BTC, without any profit sharing to the knockoffs To be honest, this situation could have been anticipated long ago. When it was designed, it was too idealistic, It is difficult to reverse the situation unless the economic model is thoroughly restructured But the time window may have already been missed