Something in Eleanor's post caught my attention: "...case is in the process of wrapping up and could be over soon." The only way the case could "be over" soon is if Ripple and the SEC reach a private settlement agreement (which would vary from the judgment), dismiss the appeal, and then simply never take the terms of the settlement agreement back to the trial court to be ratified. This is possible but, assuming the injunction is the sticking point, the SEC would have to agree not to enforce the Court's injunction. I have a hard time believing the SEC would agree to THAT, but possibly it could agree to something more oblique such as providing Ripple a path to actually register sales of XRP to institutional investors (for example). Meaning, Ripple could get what it needs, while the SEC doesn't blatantly snub the Court's order. Meaning, t can be done. This is the only way I can see the case resolving anytime in the next couple days or weeks which would apparently be consistent with what she is reporting: SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. (Warning: only read on if you want to hear me ramble.)