This attack method is a leftover from attacking OKX many years ago. Hyper is not simply an issue of unlimited open interest profit transfer, such as the maximum number of orders that can be opened with leverage, and there are also a bunch of risk control details. It can be said that at the exchange risk control level, Hyper is at a kindergarten level compared to Binance, Bybit, and OKX. It is not an exaggeration to say that this product should be reworked because risk control is the root of the exchange. It can be said that I didn't even copy my homework well, or that I didn't copy it at all for the sake of so-called "decentralization". The reason why CEX has so many risk control measures is also because they know that without these restrictions, the exchange cannot go far. And when Hyper has done all of these, you will find that he has to take risks on the chain, but what is the difference between him and Cex?