Similar to Kitty's idea, I think AI should be a complement to ordinary humans, and this complement has a limit at least from the perspective of now.

For example, I want AI to help me make a game. Within the complete framework I provide, AI can do well, but if I say to help me make a fun game, then there is almost no possibility that AI can achieve that because "fun" does not have a fixed reference.

In simple terms, for someone who knows nothing about games, it simply means that even a powerful AI cannot produce a good game because it is hard to articulate the structure of the game, but if you just say help me restore World of Warcraft as closely as possible, then as long as there is enough time and tokens, AI might be able to do it.

However, World of Warcraft does not necessarily equal a fun game, and the larger the project, the higher the demands on AI, and the higher the demands on hardware as well.

So I personally feel that AI can implement the user's clear logic through code in a lightweight manner, but if the user's requirements are vague, then it is very difficult for AI to accomplish it.

免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到[email protected]，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。