Several weeks ago, it was still that "new star" valued at about $40 billion. Now, according to a single source, the market prediction platform Kalshi's name has once again been thrust into the spotlight—this time due to rumors about a new round of financing negotiations. Bloomberg cites informed sources reporting that Kalshi is negotiating a new round of financing with investors, with the target valuation raised to about $65 billion. This claim was later cited by media such as Golden Financial, simplified in secondary transmission to a dramatic narrative of "the valuation skyrocketed from $40 billion to $65 billion within weeks." It is noteworthy that the same batch of reports repeatedly emphasizes that this is merely the target valuation in negotiations and not the confirmed transaction price, as discussions are still ongoing, terms may adjust at any time, and nothing has been finalized; meanwhile, publicly available information has not disclosed the list of investors, financing amount, or names of the rounds involved. What kind of numbers this prediction market platform deserves remains, in fact, just a version of a story floating in the air.
From $40 billion weeks ago to sprinting towards $65 billion
The timeline is indeed very tight: informed sources told Bloomberg that just weeks ago, Kalshi had completed a round of financing with a valuation of about $40 billion. Before the ink on this deal had even dried, reports began emerging with claims of "new round of financing, target valuation around $65 billion," with only a "few weeks" gap between the two rounds (according to a single source). By the time Golden Financial and other media cited it, "from $40 billion weeks ago to now sprinting towards $65 billion" crystallized into an eye-catching headline narrative, greatly amplifying the market's imagination for the prediction market sector with this $25 billion leap.
The impact brought by this rhythm partially comes from the overly smooth script: from the last round "just completed," to the next round "currently negotiating," the valuation numbers rose steadily without any publicly disclosed business data to explain what changes occurred in between (according to a single source). It is also important to highlight that all numbers related to $40 billion and $65 billion currently come from Bloomberg's single informed source, and reports repeatedly emphasize that the terms of this round of financing "may adjust"; $65 billion is merely a negotiation target rather than a final transaction price. This implies that whether it's a price drop, terms being rewritten, or even a failed transaction, theoretically everything is within the script, and the valuation itself remains on a track that can be quickly raised or similarly quickly pushed back down.
How high is the hype for prediction market Kalshi?
In this story, Kalshi is positioned as a "pricing infrastructure for future expectations"—according to publicly reported single source information, it is a prediction market platform that issues contracts based on the outcomes of future events, allowing participants to buy and sell the probabilities of "whether something will happen or not" with real money. The price is not a judgment from a research report but rather a constantly fluctuating market price, compressing the information and preferences held by various participants into an instant collective expectation. The imaginative space of this narrative lies in the idea that if enough future events can be priced this way, then everything from macroeconomic data to industry events has the potential to be converted into tradable probability labels within a unified market.
From the perspective of the sector, the reason the story of prediction markets is easily magnified by high valuations is largely due to its abstraction of a demand that was otherwise scattered across various corners of traditional finance into a "new layer of assets." In the traditional system, the market's view on future events is typically reflected indirectly through bond yield curves, implied volatility of options, interest rate swap points, or subjective judgments in analyst reports; information is not only packaged by financial engineering but also layered filtered by institutions. Prediction markets reverse this process, turning events themselves directly into contract objects, with prices being a straightforward reflection of probabilities. This "unpacking" pricing approach naturally attracts capital eager to find new information carriers and new trading scenarios. In this context, if this round of financing can indeed reach the target valuation of $65 billion, that number itself would be interpreted as elevating the entire sector to a brand new level—despite the lack of public disclosure about Kalshi’s revenue, user scale, and other operational details, capital is still willing to pay upfront for the imagination of "reshaping the pricing of future events," later waiting to see if business data can substantiate this price.
How Bloomberg's leak magnified into an industry signal
The dissemination chain of this "story of $65 billion" is, in fact, very singular: it begins with a report from Bloomberg citing an informed source (according to a single source), which was then quickly referenced by several media outlets, including Golden Financial, emphasizing in the headlines that "just weeks ago a valuation of about $40 billion was completed for the last round of financing, and now the target valuation for the new round is about $65 billion," but the body of the text revolves almost entirely around the same original report. Whether it is the original Bloomberg text or subsequent references, the wording repeatedly employs terms like "currently negotiating" and "terms may adjust," clearly stating that this is merely the target valuation in negotiations and not a finalized transaction price; at the same time, key pieces of information such as the specific list of investors, financing amounts, and round names have not been disclosed in public reports, resulting in a highly concentrated information source on this single report that, in multiple rounds of retelling, has been packaged into what seems to be a "multi-party corroboration" of market consensus, which has in itself amplified the risk of investors misreading it while quickly browsing the news.
In the phase where sentiment in the prediction market sector continues to heat up, such a leak carrying strong numerical impact is easily recognized by public opinion and capital as an "industry pricing anchor." From "about $40 billion weeks ago" to "new round target around $65 billion" (according to a single source), media has repeatedly emphasized this jump, gradually transforming it from a company's financing negotiation number to a symbol of the entire sector being repriced, while details like Kalshi’s revenue and user numbers in public info are still missing (fact missing), market discussions have already begun revolving around a valuation target that is still in negotiation, which makes a piece of information that hasn’t been cross-verified by more independent information carry amplification effects in shaping sector sentiment and imagination in a short time.
Behind the valuation surge: what capital is betting on and what it fears
For some funds, the leap from about $40 billion to $65 billion within weeks (according to a single source) is not just a number, but a bet on whether the narrative of "prediction market platforms" can grow a sufficiently large imaginative space in the next macro cycle. When expectations for returns on traditional assets are compressed and the economic outlook wobbles repeatedly, the market is often more willing to pay a premium for stories that "could potentially reprice information and risk": if a platform can truly establish a new infrastructure for pricing the probabilities of future events, whoever occupies the sector first will theoretically amplify the network effects and bargaining power. In some institutions' models, $65 billion looks more like the cost of securing “future pricing power” in advance rather than a discounted outcome of current cash flows.
However, this intensive and high-multiple valuation uplift fundamentally remains on the negotiation table. Public reports reiterate phrases like "still negotiating" and "terms may adjust," with $65 billion clearly marked as the "target valuation" (according to a single source). Up until now, there has been no official document, nor is there any regulatory disclosure confirming this round of financing and valuation. Details regarding Kalshi's revenue, user numbers, and even the latest regulatory developments have also not been publicly disclosed (fact missing). At the execution level, this means that capital is actually placing advance bids for an object with incomplete information and a business model still being refined, with a potentially evolving regulatory framework; at the regulatory level, the boundaries of prediction markets and whether there will be additional restrictions in the future could substantially discount the valuation. For readers, the most important thing is not to be led emotionally by the label of "$65 billion," but to always distinguish: what is being repeatedly cited now is just the target number in negotiations, and not a market price that has occurred and can be regarded as definitive transaction pricing.
The valuation game is not over, the next act of the prediction market
From this point onward, the story has at least three potential directions: one is that after several rounds of tug-of-war, the negotiations still land near the target valuation of about $65 billion, allowing Kalshi to instantly reach a new benchmark height in the prediction market sector (according to a single source); another is that terms are significantly lowered through back-and-forth bargaining and that the final transaction price ends up far below the currently circulating figure, giving this round of sentiment a live lesson on "valuation return"; yet another is that the transaction is shelved, with the currently magnified expectations rapidly retracting due to a lack of substantial grounding. This rumor, on one hand, gives the entire sector a strong shot of confidence, enabling external capital to rethink the ceiling of prediction market platforms; on the other hand, it reminds all participants that pursuing yet-to-be-negotiated target valuations—when the commercial model, regulatory framework, and fundamental information remain opaque—is itself a high-leverage emotional gamble. Current public reports only reiterate "still negotiating, terms may adjust"; as of now, no authoritative channels have disclosed the final transaction results, and how it evolves will still need to be verified by official disclosures and more independent sources. What truly warrants ongoing attention moving forward is where the financing terms ultimately land, and whether this transaction will become a new pricing anchor point for the prediction market sector.
Join our community, let's discuss and grow stronger together!
Exclusive Hyperliquid benefits for AiCoin: https://app.hyperliquid.xyz/join/AICOIN88
Exclusive Aster benefits for AiCoin: https://www.asterdex.com/zh-CN/referral/9C50e2
On-chain Telegram community: https://t.me/AiCoinWhaleData
On-chain community: https://www.aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=N6OVMor5g
AiCoin on-chain Twitter: https://x.com/aicoinwhaledata
免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到[email protected]，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。
