The collaboration between Anchorage Digital and Visa is one of the most concrete entries into this wave of technological evolution: as a federally chartered bank in the United States, Anchorage Digital Bank issues and custodies a dollar-pegged token named USDPT, which has recently been integrated into the Visa settlement network, allowing Visa and eligible businesses to settle using USDPT on the network, although the specific effective date, scale, and applicability have not yet been made public. According to a single source, USDPT is the first dollar token issued by Anchorage to receive settlement eligibility on the Visa network, and has even been described by some reports as the "dollar token of Western Union," though this association has not been officially confirmed by Anchorage, Visa, or Western Union. Coinciding with all of this, another seemingly unrelated message was presented at Yale University: Federal Reserve Board member Michael Barr reminded the audience that the rapid proliferation of artificial intelligence could significantly widen income gaps and severely impact the labor market in the short term, warning that if a few AI companies dominate, the excessive concentration of market power will make the management and shareholders of these companies the main beneficiaries, further exacerbating inequality. As regulators seek to make room for a new generation of technological infrastructure, the financial settlement upgrades represented by USDPT and the distribution rupture risk warned by Barr are converging in the same scenario. The tension of driving innovation with one hand while worrying about inequality with the other is precisely the reality this article aims to track.
Bank License Support: USDPT Enters Visa Settlement Layer
When Anchorage Digital Bank took the stage as a "federally chartered bank," the story of USDPT entering the Visa settlement layer became more than just a technical news piece about a new token being "integrated" by a big company; it became a rewriting of standards. Anchorage was originally a bank holding a federal license, and now it is personally issuing and custoding the dollar-denominated digital token named USDPT; Visa has also announced that it allows itself and eligible businesses to use this token for network settlements. From a regulatory perspective, this effectively embeds a dollar token that is issued and custodied by a federally regulated bank directly into the settlement pipeline of the global payment infrastructure, allowing the combination of "bank credit + compliance review" to become a prerequisite for such tokens to enter the mainstream clearing layer. A more subtle point is that, according to a single source, USDPT is the first such token issued by Anchorage to obtain settlement eligibility on the Visa network, but this does not mean it is the first token in the entire Visa system to be allowed to participate in settlement. Such restraint in wording itself reflects the participants' deliberate maintenance of boundaries in positioning.
From the perspective of the pathway, USDPT's entry into the Visa settlement layer provides a reference model on the theme of "how dollar tokens can be deeply bound to the banking system and then absorbed by traditional networks": first obtain a federally chartered bank license, then have the bank personally issue and custodian the token, and finally push the token to the settlement layer through collaboration with a payment giant, rather than just stopping at front-end consumer scenarios. This banking and compliance template sends a clear signal to other token projects wanting to enter traditional financial channels and establishes a new threshold. However, the outline of this cooperation is still vague at present—specific effective dates have not been made public, the scale of settlements remains unclear, and what currencies or fiat currencies are supported, as well as which enterprises qualify as "eligible," have not been disclosed; details regarding the issuance scale of USDPT, reserve composition, and audit arrangements are also absent. Under this density of information, we can ascertain that bank licenses are being used to provide institutional credit for a new generation of settlement tools, but this "banking demonstration" is still in an early stage with scarce data and unclear rules, making any path judgments derived from this uncertainty-laden.
From On-Chain to Merchant Side: Who Will Use USDPT First?
In Visa's terminology, “eligible enterprises” is a deliberately vague label. By Visa's conventional cooperation path, the institutions most likely to first engage with the USDPT settlement track are typically those that already possess significant settlement volumes on its network and have mature compliance capabilities: cross-border acquiring institutions, regional payment companies, e-commerce platforms with global buyers, or payment platforms that provide technical services to these enterprises. For them, USDPT is not a new currency for end-users but an additional track within the settlement layer—behind the same bill, they can choose to settle with traditional fiat currency or attempt to complete part of the position transfer using an on-chain token pegged to the dollar. However, without the public disclosure of a list or standards, all predictions about “who will take the first bite” can only remain at the level of business types and cannot be treated as established facts.
Cross-border remittances and small cross-border payments are scenarios almost always mentioned when discussing dollar-pegged tokens: high frequency, small amounts per transaction, yet long bound by time costs and intermediary fees. It is also for this reason that when the outside world sees USDPT described by some sources as “the dollar token of Western Union,” it instinctively leans its imagination toward this track. However, currently, there is only a single source report on this statement, and Anchorage, Visa, and Western Union have not provided official confirmation; this cooperation has also not disclosed whether it will undergo system-level transformations for specific remittance or payment business lines, making such “associative matching” more a case of the market filling in gaps in information rather than established fact.
What truly deserves attention is the potential structural changes that could arise once this settlement channel extends from Anchorage's on-chain accounts to the traditional acquiring system. If dollar-pegged tokens can meet Visa's risk control and compliance thresholds and be used for network settlements between institutions and Visa, what is being leveraged is not just the speed of on-chain transfers, but the rewriting of the role of crypto assets: transforming from speculative chips affected by price volatility to being embedded in the underlying infrastructure governed by card organization rules and settlement processes. For terminal merchants and consumers, the process on the screen may still appear as a mere “card swipe” or “online payment,” but in the background, some settlement positions may no longer circulate purely through traditional paths but are completed via the on-chain tokens custodied by Anchorage. Currently, there is no public data to indicate the issuance scale of USDPT, the actual number of users, or the settlement volume on the Visa network, which means that what we see now is more a matter of “structural possibilities,” and what truly determines whether it can settle on the merchant side and form a scale effect is which business lines are willing to first bring the settlement layer onto the chain, and whether regulators and the market are willing to accept the premise of crypto assets reentering the traditional payment landscape as infrastructure.
The Shadow in Yale's Speech: AI May Widen Interest Rate Differences First
As Anchorage and Visa sketch out the structural possibilities of on-chain settlement, regulators on another front have shifted their gaze toward the more macro issue of the distribution of technological dividends. In his speech at Yale University, Federal Reserve Board member Michael Barr practically pulled artificial intelligence out of the package of “efficiency tools” back into the reality of income distribution and the labor market. He publicly included the socio-economic impact of AI within the regulatory agenda, assessing that the rapid proliferation of this technology resembles a shock experiment targeting laborers in the short term: the incremental productivity is initially captured by the capital side and technology providers, while the bargaining power of ordinary positions and low- and mid-skill workers is suppressed, widening the gap between labor and capital, and between lower-income groups and high-income groups, instead of flattening it.
In Barr's narrative framework, AI is not a naturally benevolent technological curve but a potential systemic risk that requires the pre-setting of “guardrails.” He repeatedly emphasized that the intensity and duration of AI's impact on inequality and employment depend on whether the regulatory safeguards being constructed at this moment can be timely in place; otherwise, short-term shocks to the labor market may evolve into structural distributional ruptures. What further unsettles him is the concentration of power: if a few AI companies dominate, excessive market power concentration will tilt profits further toward the executives and shareholders of these companies, creating another layer of capital differential on paper, while ordinary users covered by the technology and replaced positions find it difficult to share the same increments. Barr did not provide a specific list of regulatory tools in his speech, nor did he commit to a timeline for subsequent actions, but he posed a clear question back to regulators and the market: what ultimately determines which side AI ends up on is whether the regulatory guardrails currently being constructed can effectively constrain excessive concentration of power before the technological dividends are realized.
Same Anxiety: Infrastructure Upgrades but Distribution Ruptures
The entry of USDPT into Visa's settlement layer by Anchorage is, in fact, part of the same wave of technological upheaval described by Barr regarding AI expansion: both are quietly accelerating at the level of “infrastructure.” For a global payment network like Visa, opening USDPT for settlements means that a dollar-denominated token issued and custodied by a federally chartered bank is embedded into a highly concentrated, high-threshold underlying pipeline, expected to improve transaction speed and cross-border transfer efficiency. However, who truly shares this part of the gain is asymmetrical—those able to directly access the Visa network and meet the “eligible enterprise” standard are institutions that already occupy an advantageous position in the global payment landscape, and their new benefits in terms of cost and liquidity are unlikely to be proportionately transmitted to the individual users being served, let alone cover those still excluded from the mainstream financial network.
What Barr fears is, in fact, the same kind of structure: if the computing power, data, and modeling capabilities of AI are centralized in the hands of a few leading enterprises, the bargaining power and profit margins of these companies will drastically expand, while the broader society will bear the short-term impacts on the labor market and the ruptures in income distribution. In the thread concerning USDPT, Anchorage leverages its federally chartered bank identity to provide a compliant framework for such dollar tokens, enabling entry into Visa's settlement infrastructure; on the AI track, Barr repeatedly emphasizes the need to establish regulatory safeguards in advance for technological expansion to ensure the “guardrails” are in place before capital and computing power concentration occurs. Essentially, both matters unfold in the same tension field: when technological upgrades are controlled by a few large institutions, the timely construction of sufficiently solid institutional boundaries by regulators determines whether the efficiency dividends of infrastructure exacerbate systemic inequalities or are partially corrected into more manageable public benefits.
Regulatory Tightrope: Drawing Guardrails for Crypto and AI
From Anchorage Digital Bank to the entry of USDPT into the Visa settlement layer, what genuinely gets written into the regulatory textbook is not the technical parameters of a new token but a pathway of “obtaining a license and accessing traditional networks”: first becoming a federally chartered bank in the United States, then issuing and custoding dollar-denominated tokens within the existing regulatory framework, and finally striving to have Visa and eligible businesses use it for network settlements, leveraging compliance status to pry open traditional payment infrastructure. However, the degree to which this pathway is realized remains unknown—details regarding the effective date of the cooperation, settlement scale, and applicable scope of enterprises have yet to be disclosed, and the regulatory and market acceptance of this model is still in the observation period. Concurrently, Barr's speech at Yale places AI on the same balance: whether technological diffusion exacerbates income inequality and the duration of labor shocks will depend on whether regulatory safeguards can be properly established now, especially whether they can prevent a few AI giants from monopolizing computing power and data, locking in value chain benefits for executives and shareholders. From this perspective, whether it is crypto or AI, regulatory concern has shifted from "can it be done?" to "who profits from it, and who bears the tail risks?" The implications for the crypto industry are direct: the era focused solely on technical performance and on-chain efficiency is fading, replaced by narratives surrounding distribution, fairness, and systemic risks; any participant wishing to enter the mainstream financial network must adapt in advance to this regulatory mindset that starts from structural inequality.
Join our community to discuss and become stronger together!
AiCoin exclusive Hyperliquid benefits: https://app.hyperliquid.xyz/join/AICOIN88
AiCoin exclusive Aster benefits: https://www.asterdex.com/en-US/referral/9C50e2
On-chain Telegram community: https://t.me/AiCoinWhaleData
On-chain community: https://www.aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=N6OVMor5g
AiCoin on-chain Twitter: https://x.com/aicoinwhaledata
免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到[email protected]，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。
