On November 9, 2026, the New Zealand Financial Markets Authority introduced a rare “deregulation experiment”: seeking public opinion on payment tokens denominated in New Zealand dollars and backed by New Zealand dollar assets, intending to delineate compliant New Zealand payment tokens from the category of “financial products” under the Financial Markets Conduct Act through category designation, provided the related tokens are fully backed by assets in New Zealand dollars held in a registered bank in New Zealand and can be redeemed at face value. FMA’s General Counsel Liam Mason stated that this step is not an overall release but a test of a clearer regulatory path—before native currency payment tokens gradually integrate into on-chain and offline transaction infrastructure, a controlled but relatively loose compliance space is created for them. On the same day, Deutsche Bank and Ant Group jointly released a white paper titled “Agent Payments in Wholesale Finance,” focusing on another emerging infrastructure: in wholesale financial scenarios, AI agents are envisioned as “active participants” capable of autonomously predicting gaps and surpluses in cash and liquidity management, assessing response plans, and integrating into payment processes. The white paper attempts to establish a responsibility and governance framework for this new role. At a more macro regulatory level, South Korea's Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Economy and Finance, Lee Hyeon-dong, emphasized the need for “further observation” regarding regulatory trends for AI data centers following the U.S. midterm elections while stating that there have been no exceptional circumstances so far. These three seemingly disparate messages converge at the same time: on one end, native currency payment tokens are cautiously moved out of traditional financial product definitions; on another, agents are brought to the forefront of wholesale payment; and on yet another end, there is a deliberate wait-and-see approach regarding AI infrastructure regulations. Together, they outline an undefined global situation—in the space between payment tokens and smart financial infrastructure, regulators and traditional financial institutions are tentatively advancing while intentionally maintaining a calm distance.
New Zealand Dollar Payment Stablecoins: Attempts at Deregulation from Financial Products to Payment Tools
In the vision of the New Zealand Financial Markets Authority, payment tokens denominated in New Zealand dollars and backed by New Zealand dollar assets must first be “reframed” within a narrower safe zone: all corresponding New Zealand dollar assets must be held in full at a New Zealand registered bank, and token holders must have the option to redeem them at face value at any time, achieving a 1:1 exchange for New Zealand dollars. Only when both conditions are met does the FMA intend to remove this type of product from the category of traditional “financial products” under the Financial Markets Conduct Act through category designation, so that on-chain payment tools are no longer automatically regarded as investment financial products but rather as technical carriers closer to cash alternatives.
For issuers, the combination of full bank custody and face value redemption means that any “reinvestment” space exceeding the custody balance is significantly compressed, and the operational focus must return to compliant custody and redemption capabilities; however, the reward is the opportunity to escape the complex financial product compliance framework and pursue a more direct payment licensing path. For users, a clear 1:1 redemption promise shifts the risk perception from “Is this a high-risk financial product?” to “Is this a trustworthy New Zealand payment tool?” The regulatory boundary is intentionally tightened, yet a more realistic path for usage scenarios is opened. As FMA General Counsel Liam Mason stated, this is an attempt to “test a clearer regulatory path,” and this approach of granting category exemptions to create a dedicated channel for native currency payment tokens is not only an institutional experiment in New Zealand but may also become an important reference model for other jurisdictions when redefining the boundaries between payment tokens and financial products.
Global Regulatory Divergence on Payment Tokens: The Gaps Explored by New Zealand’s Path
For fiat-denominated payment tokens, major jurisdictions are still oscillating between different characterizations: should they be seen as securities, electronic money, or should a separate chapter be carved out for payment infrastructure? Currently, there is no unified answer, and this uncertainty is part of the regulatory game. The New Zealand Financial Markets Authority's recent approach focuses on a very specific tool—payment tokens denominated in New Zealand dollars and supported by New Zealand dollar assets—and through “category designation,” it aims to remove compliant products from the category of financial products under the Financial Markets Conduct Act. Unlike many countries that directly incorporate new tokens into existing financial product frameworks, New Zealand chooses to first narrow the focus to the specific scenario of native currency payments, reducing investment attributes and strengthening payment functions to test whether risks remain controllable after a reduction in regulatory intensity.
Once this path is implemented, the implications for on-chain New Zealand dollar-denominated assets, cross-border payments, and compliant issuance will become concrete: the proposal requires that related tokens must be fully backed by New Zealand dollar assets held in a registered bank in New Zealand and can be redeemed at face value, meaning that if compliant New Zealand payment tokens are issued on-chain in the future, their compliance structure will be closely tied to the local banking system from day one. Issuers and tech service providers will need to design around custody arrangements, redemption mechanisms, and information disclosures rather than simply “posting a New Zealand dollar price” on-chain. This experimental path combining native currency denomination, bank custody, and category designation not only provides clearer regulatory coordinates for domestic payment tokens in New Zealand but may also serve as a reference model for other countries considering exemptions for native currency on-chain payment tools, reminding regulators that there still exist institutional gaps to be redrawn regarding global payment tokens.
Deutsche Bank and Ant Group: Agents Taking Over Daily Payments in Wholesale Finance
Emerging almost simultaneously with New Zealand’s regulatory gap for on-chain New Zealand dollar payments is the white paper titled “Agent Payments in Wholesale Finance” jointly released by Deutsche Bank and Ant Group. This document no longer contemplates “smart wallets” from the retail side but instead focuses on institutional wholesale finance, entrusting AI agents with financial management, liquidity management, and inter-institutional clearing processes that were previously hidden in the background, while discussing the corresponding governance framework: who empowers, who supervises, and who is responsible when errors occur. In the financial management and liquidity management scenarios depicted in the white paper, agents are designed to continuously monitor the inflow and outflow rhythm of accounts, autonomously predict future funding gaps and surpluses, and then evaluate various payment and settlement options to provide financial departments with decision-making recommendations on when and through which routes to complete large payments.
Once such agents are placed on top of on-chain tokenized assets denominated in New Zealand dollars and backed by New Zealand dollar assets, the regulatory parameters set up by the New Zealand Financial Markets Authority—requiring that they must be fully backed by New Zealand dollar assets held in a locally registered bank, can be redeemed at face value, and no longer deemed as financial products under the Financial Markets Conduct Act under specific conditions—will not just be legal texts but will directly constrain the “decision-making space” of the agents. When agents compare on-chain payment tokens with traditional bank transfers and wholesale clearing channels, they must incorporate these regulatory boundaries into their assessments, meaning the compliance attributes, redemption mechanisms, and custody arrangements of payment tokens will become part of the algorithmic considerations. The vision of how agents can predict gaps and evaluate plans by Deutsche Bank and Ant Group emerged on the same day as New Zealand’s attempt to delineate regulatory boundaries for native currency payment tokens, which itself is a signal: future daily payments in wholesale finance are likely to seek a new balance between tokenized assets defined by regulations and auditable agents.
South Korea's Cautious Observation on AI Data Centers: Infrastructure Regulation and Cross-Border Risks
On the same day, as New Zealand and multinational financial institutions shifted their focus to payment tokens and agent governance, the South Korean government’s perspective was on the more “fundamental” infrastructure. In a speech at a full meeting of the National Assembly's Budget Settlement Special Committee, South Korea’s Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Economy and Finance Lee Hyeon-dong did not provide a vigorous statement on AI data centers but chose to lower expectations: the regulatory trends surrounding AI data centers “still need observation” after the U.S. midterm elections, and that there are currently “no exceptional circumstances and it needs further observation for some time.” This phrase, “still needs further observation for some time,” was made in the context of markets already beginning to worry about the political and regulatory risks that may arise for investments in U.S. AI and data centers, essentially publicly acknowledging the presence of risks while asserting that policies will not rush and will not provide excessive commitments to soothe short-term emotions.
Unlike New Zealand’s proactive testing of regulatory paths for native currency payment tokens, and the efforts by Deutsche Bank and Ant Group to integrate agent payments into wholesale finance, Lee Hyeon-dong’s position is one of extending the timeline: first to observe how the U.S. handles AI data centers, and then determine how South Korea will handle its capital and digital infrastructure. For financial institutions contemplating introducing agent payments and transferring financial and liquidity management to algorithms, this prudence is not just concerning the location and timing of overseas data centers but also signals a regulatory style—before establishing cross-border AI infrastructure and allowing agents to connect to real funds and payment tokens, South Korea views infrastructure safety, data jurisdiction, and potential impacts of U.S. regulations as variables on the same risk chain and not as background noise that can be easily overlooked by technological optimism.
From New Zealand Dollar Payment Tokens to Agent Payments: An Observation Checklist Following Regulatory Exploration
On this timeline from New Zealand dollar-denominated payment tokens to agent payment infrastructure, the FMA’s public consultation effectively opens a “limited exemption” experimental channel for on-chain payment tools denominated in native currency: as long as conditions such as full custody of New Zealand assets in a registered bank in New Zealand and redemption at face value are met, compliant New Zealand payment tokens are expected to be removed from the category of traditional financial products under the Financial Markets Conduct Act, thereby reserving more flexible regulatory space for domestic settlement, clearing, and daily payments anchored in native currency. On the same day, Deutsche Bank and Ant Group pushed for agents to take over financial and liquidity management in wholesale finance, while senior figures in South Korea cautiously viewed AI data centers with the attitude of “still needing further observation.” These three actions collectively indicate one signal: whether it is payment tokens or agent financial infrastructure, the paths of regulation and institutional choices are leaning more towards gradual exploration rather than aggressive advancement. Continuing variables to track will be whether New Zealand's consultation leads to the establishment of a replicable regulatory template for New Zealand payment tokens, the speed and boundaries at which Deutsche Bank and Ant Group’s agent payments transition from concept to specific scenarios, and whether the regulatory direction of various countries, including South Korea, regarding AI data centers and agent access to real funding systems will shift from “continued observation” to clearer permissions or restrictions.
Join our community, let's discuss and become stronger together!
AiCoin exclusive Hyperliquid benefits: https://app.hyperliquid.xyz/join/AICOIN88
AiCoin exclusive Aster benefits: https://www.asterdex.com/zh-CN/referral/9C50e2
On-chain Telegram community: https://t.me/AiCoinWhaleData
On-chain community: https://www.aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=N6OVMor5g
AiCoin on-chain Twitter: https://x.com/aicoinwhaledata
免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到[email protected]，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。
