On October 27, 2025, Ripple released a seemingly brief yet highly symbolic announcement: The Bank of New York Mellon officially included XRP and RLUSD in its digital asset custody platform. The external explanation was simple — qualified institutional clients can use the infrastructure of this traditional custody giant to safeguard, hold, and transfer these two assets on their books — but in the ongoing tug-of-war between crypto and traditional finance, this step felt more like a gate being slowly opened. Prior to this, BNY Mellon had already provided reserve custody for RLUSD and acted as custodian for Ripple's Ripple Prime business. The addition of XRP and RLUSD custody essentially extended the cooperation that was originally limited to "behind-the-scenes asset protection" to the front-end product level aimed at institutional clients. The announcement also mentioned that both parties plan to expand support for tokenized assets and investment products on the XRP Ledger and explore tokenized trade finance scenarios, though no clear implementation path or timeline has been provided. It is worth noting that key details regarding custody scale, the list of institutions, and regulatory progress remain unaddressed, and the market can only piece together the whole picture based on Ripple's official statement. However, in a coordinate system where an important custodial bank like BNY Mellon is personally involved, this upgrade is already substantial enough to be seen as a clear signal that traditional financial infrastructure is further extending into the world of crypto assets and tokenization.

XRP and RLUSD Join the Traditional Custody Table

When BNY Mellon formally included XRP and RLUSD in its digital asset custody platform, these two types of assets were processed for the first time within the same "back-end system" as traditional assets. For qualified institutional clients, XRP and RLUSD are no longer just a string of addresses on the blockchain, but asset classes that can be safeguarded, held, and transferred through BNY Mellon as a custody bank, unified with the fund shares and bond custody instructions they are used to operating on the same control panel. Previously, BNY Mellon had been responsible for the reserve custody of RLUSD and provided custody services for Ripple Prime. Now, the addition of custody for the underlying assets of XRP and RLUSD essentially upgraded the relationship from "managing underlying reserves, managing part of the business" to "directly managing on-chain assets," effectively tying front-end transactions, back-end asset security, and account bookkeeping more closely together.

Once the compliant custody infrastructure is complete, the threshold for institutions to allocate XRP and RLUSD has been significantly lowered: risk control can fill in the custody risk exposure in familiar forms, operations can continue using existing custody processes, and investment decisions need not hold an additional meeting about "where to place the assets and who will safeguard them." Although the announcement did not disclose custody scale or client lists, gaining "access qualification" on the platform of a traditional custodian bank has built a channel for the potential liquidity of XRP and RLUSD — market makers, funders, and corporate clients wanting to design tokenized assets or future trade finance products around the XRP Ledger consider this custody interface part of the infrastructure. Moving forward, whether more capital will flow through BNY Mellon’s custody channel treating XRP and RLUSD as positions that can be held and managed long-term, rather than just short-term trial trades, will determine whether this custody access can truly translate into lasting market depth and usage scenarios.

From RLUSD Reserves to Ripple Prime

Before this custody channel was truly opened to the public, BNY Mellon had already grasped the most critical link behind the scenes — the reserve for RLUSD. When Ripple launched products backed by fiat currency assets, entrusting the underlying reserve to traditional custodial giants meant that how the funds pool is stored, reconciled, and audited is fully accomplished under the risk control and processes of BNY Mellon. For institutions, RLUSD is not an arbitrarily generated "token," but rather supported by a complete custodial architecture and counterparty credit, which preemptively eliminates the most sensitive layer of uncertainty for any subsequent transactions and settlements based on RLUSD.

Subsequently, Ripple also brought its more market-facing Ripple Prime into BNY Mellon custody, allowing the bank not only to guard the reserves behind RLUSD but also to directly serve Ripple's trading and asset management business aimed at institutions. By the time the announcement landed on October 27, 2025, BNY Mellon’s digital asset custody platform had once again taken a step forward by including XRP and RLUSD themselves in the custody list. This transition was essentially from "custody supporting RLUSD's funding" to "custody of XRP and RLUSD positions held by institutions." From reserve custody to Prime, and then to direct asset custody, this chain of cooperation has been incrementally completed, pushing the relationship from infrastructure supply and single-product custody towards a deeper, more sustained joint bet on the whole XRP Ledger ecosystem.

XRPL Tokenized Assets and Trade Finance Vision

With the completion of the custody chain, the next step put forth by both parties in the announcement is to raise the vision from "custodial existing positions" to "custody of various assets and investment products tokenized on the XRPL." This no longer merely helps institutional clients store XRP or RLUSD, but aims to reserve space at the ledger level for various tokenized vehicles — whether it is structured products designed around RLUSD or new asset forms registered on the XRP Ledger are all included in the vision of "expanded support." For Ripple, this is about packaging the XRPL into a tokenized infrastructure acceptable to traditional custodial banks; for BNY Mellon, it attempts to incorporate this chain into its product architecture based on existing custody capabilities, but it still remains at the planning stage and has not been expressed as a concrete business line that is live.

More imaginative, and also more uncertain, is the mention in the announcement of "tokenized trade finance scenarios based on the XRP Ledger." If this vision progresses forward, it could mean that not only is the asset holding status tokenized, but trade funding flows and credit exposures themselves might also be abstracted into custodial and transferable positions on the XRPL, thereby truly directing this chain toward a point of intersection with cross-border trade and financial infrastructure. However, as of the announcement release and until October 27, 2026, neither party has disclosed any implementation plans or timelines regarding tokenized trade finance; the related content remains at the stage of "planning to explore," and the current publicly available information mainly comes from Ripple's single official channel, making it difficult for the market to gauge whether this is a routinely expanded effort following sufficient regulatory communication or a more experimental business maneuver.

Regulatory Shadows and Institutional Custody Dilemma

For a custodial bank like BNY Mellon, incorporating XRP and RLUSD into its digital asset custody platform is not just adding another line item to its product line, but rather stepping onto ground where regulation and reputation have not yet been fully priced. Traditional financial institutions typically must meet strict compliance and risk management requirements in crypto custody operations, yet this official disclosure contained no regulatory approval details or specific license information, and the quantity and scale of custodied assets were completely undisclosed. Even the question of which categories constitute "qualified institutional clients" and whether there is a first batch of lists remains blank. More subtly, by October 2026, external parties could rely almost exclusively on Ripple's single official information chain, lacking cross-verification from multiple institutions, which makes it hard for the market to assess whether this represents a regularly expanded effort fully sanctioned by regulators or a more exploratory step.

In this information asymmetry, the real pressure falls on potential institutional clients: on one side, they can choose to entrust their assets to a custodial bank like BNY Mellon, which has established traditional credibility and is seen as a "regulatory facade," while on the other side, they may continue pursuing higher asset control through self-custody or more aggressive third-party solutions. The former appears nominally more accommodating to risk and compliance, yet the absence of disclosures makes it difficult to assess regulatory flexibility and business boundaries, while the latter walks a tightrope between operational freedom and regulatory exposure. When the custody scale, client structure, and even regulatory communication paths remain unclear, this collaboration appears, from the institutional perspective, more like an "incompletely informed multiple-choice question," with no answers in the announcement, but rather to be written out gradually by each party's risk preferences and compliance criteria over the coming years.

Custody is Just the Beginning to See Institutional Real Funds

BNY Mellon's inclusion of XRP and RLUSD into its custody platform resembles opening a compliance gateway before the Ripple ecosystem and XRPL tokenization vision — qualified institutions now have a technical and procedural pathway to move funds and positions onto the XRPL, reserving infrastructure for subsequent explorations of tokenized assets, investment products, and even trade finance. However, as of October 27, 2026, publicly available information shows neither a growth curve for custody asset scale nor authoritative disclosures of new institutional clients, much less any tokenized trade finance projects actively running real deals on the XRPL. All imagination regarding "institutional adoption" remains at the announcement level. For Ripple and BNY Mellon, this cooperation is merely a step for traditional custodial banks to penetrate crypto and tokenization, and it is not the sole case in the market, nor does it constitute an automatic proof of a trend; with the regulatory frameworks not yet fully clarified and information primarily sourced from Ripple without cross-validation among multiple institutions, what truly deserves close attention is whether there will be sustained and verifiable expansion in custody scale over the coming years, as well as the tempo at which tokenized trade finance transitions from planning to implementation, rather than interpreting a single custody expansion as a signal that institutional funds have already irreversibly surged into the XRPL.

Join our community to discuss and get stronger together!
AiCoin Exclusive Hyperliquid Benefits: https://app.hyperliquid.xyz/join/AICOIN88
AiCoin Exclusive Aster Benefits: https://www.asterdex.com/zh-CN/referral/9C50e2
On-chain Telegram Community: https://t.me/AiCoinWhaleData
On-chain Community: https://www.aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=N6OVMor5g
AiCoin On-chain Twitter: https://x.com/aicoinwhaledata

免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到[email protected]，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。