On October 27, 2026, two originally evolving paths were forcibly aligned side by side in the industry narrative: on one side, NASDAQ-listed payment technology company ACI Worldwide partnered with Circle, listed on the New York Stock Exchange, to integrate on-chain settlement assets priced in USDC and others into the traditional system. Relying on the cloud-native payment orchestration platform ACI Connetic, they attempted to embed this settlement capability into the existing banking and payment infrastructure, choosing Latin America, especially Colombia, as the initial stage for demonstrating cross-border payments and local settlements; on the other side, Jeff, co-founder of the decentralized derivatives protocol Hyperliquid, announced a collaboration plan with Payward, clearly indicating that they would build their derivatives business on Hyperliquid's on-chain infrastructure and publicly praised Kraken, associated with Payward, as a trustworthy and technically sound trading platform in the crypto space. On the surface, this seemed like two incidents of cooperation that were temporally adjacent but operationally independent, with no information indicating they stemmed from the same top-level design or shared a unified roadmap. However, they were both highlighted in the same timeframe, precisely outlining the dual lines of the current infrastructure evolution: one line is about "connecting on-chain assets to the pipeline," trying to integrate into the compliant processes of banks and payment systems; the other line is about allowing centralized trading platforms to "borrow the chain," expanding new derivatives and on-chain business maps on external decentralized infrastructure.

USDC Connects with ACI Payment Pipeline to Test Latin America

Following the line of "connecting on-chain assets to the pipeline," this cooperation was brought to the forefront on October 27: NASDAQ-listed global payment technology company ACI Worldwide (ACIW) teamed up with Circle (CRCL), the issuer of USDC listed on the New York Stock Exchange, not by creating an independent parallel payment network, but by directly embedding USDC settlements into existing banking and payment infrastructures. The official information provided a technical path based on ACI's cloud-native payment orchestration platform ACI Connetic, connecting the messaging flows familiar to banks and payment institutions with Circle's USDC infrastructure, making "whether to use USDC" a choice at the backend configuration level rather than forcing banks to adopt an unfamiliar system. In this narrative, USDC is not intended to replace the old pipeline, but is regarded as another type of settlement asset that can be inserted into the old pipeline.

The initial focus of the cooperation was on Colombia in Latin America, explicitly marked as a demonstration scenario: on one hand, it attempted to showcase the pathway of "on-chain transfer, offline receipt" in cross-border payments, and on the other hand, it observed whether banks and merchants at the local settlement level were willing to accept such new settlement options. However, so far, this project has not provided a more detailed timeline, nor disclosed the scale of the pilot, the list of participating banks, or the progress of regulatory approvals, remaining at the stage of "direction set, scenario selected." It is exactly in this state of scarce information that the symbolic significance of this demonstration is magnified: for traditional financial institutions, it marks a potential path—integrating on-chain assets like USDC into compliant pipelines without dismantling existing payment systems and testing whether they can be utilized as part of daily settlements in the real market.

Colombia Becomes the Outpost for USDC Settlements

Choosing Colombia as the "outpost" was not a random decision by ACI and Circle. Research briefs have already tagged Latin America, particularly Colombia, as a high-growth market for stablecoin payments. Under this premise, what the two companies are actually verifying is a combinatorial proposition: in a country expected to be a high growth area by external observers, can the direct embedding of USDC settlements into existing banking and payment processes truly balance the preference for dollar-denominated assets with a respect for the current state of local financial infrastructure? In the cross-border payment pathway, one can imagine that an overseas payer initiates a transaction through an institution connected to ACI Connetic, with the underlying clearing completed with USDC on the chain, and then, by connecting with the local banking system, arrives at the funding in a familiar account form; while in the local settlement pathway, USDC acts more like a settlement layer between banks and payment institutions, and end users see the existing bank cards, accounts, and payment interfaces, only with the underlying value flowing in parts as on-chain assets.

This design suggests that Colombia is not only a market testing point but also a replicable template: if this demonstration can succeed here, it can theoretically be implemented in other Latin American countries by embedding USDC settlements into their respective banking and payment systems without the need to rebuild independent networks. However, the constraints are equally clear—the current cooperation has not disclosed specific user types, transaction categories, or business scale, and the list of participating banks and regulatory approval status remain blank. These variables will differ in each country, determining whether the so-called "high-growth soil" can actually be cultivated into a sustainable settlement network.

Hyperliquid Joins Payward for On-Chain Derivatives

If ACI and Circle are embedding USDC into traditional payment pipelines, then at the same time, Hyperliquid's collaboration with Payward is connecting centralized exchanges to on-chain native infrastructures on the other end. Hyperliquid itself is a decentralized derivatives protocol, with the core narrative being "the protocol layer as infrastructure," allowing derivative trading to operate directly under on-chain rules. Co-founder Jeff publicly announced that they would cooperate with Payward, associated with the well-known exchange Kraken, to advance on-chain derivatives business on Hyperliquid’s infrastructure, describing Kraken as one of the trustworthy and respected exchanges in the crypto space, also a steadfast supporter of related technologies and cryptocurrency concepts. The Hyperliquid team emphasized their role with the statement, "we are honored that Kraken chose to conduct related cooperation on its infrastructure": they are not simply connecting with a C-end customer, but aim to become a kind of "derivatives foundation."

For a large player like Kraken, the choice to stand on external on-chain infrastructure rather than fully building a closed derivatives system signals an attitude: on one hand, accepting decentralized protocols as the technical foundation, and on the other hand, retaining centralized branding and compliance shells. However, from the publicly available information, this signal remains at the framework level—the specifics of derivatives types, launch timing, whether it involves U.S. users, and financial terms and technical integration details of the cooperation have not been disclosed, leaving the external observers unable to determine whether this is merely an experimental field on the margin or a prototype of a future business backbone. Nonetheless, it resonates with the ACI–Circle case: one path embeds crypto assets into traditional financial infrastructure, while the other allows centralized platforms to stand on top of decentralized protocols. What is truly worth observing is whether more centralized trading platforms will choose similar paths, treating on-chain protocols as infrastructures rather than merely competitive products.

Compliance Pipeline and On-Chain Native Dual-Line Race

Also on the timeline of October 27, 2026, ACI–Circle and Hyperliquid–Payward find themselves on two almost opposite tracks. The former has chosen to embed dollar-denominated tokens represented by USDC into existing banking and payment systems through ACI’s cloud-native payment orchestration platform ACI Connetic, demonstrating cross-border and local settlements in Latin American markets like Colombia; the keywords are "compatible," "compliant," and "no reinventing the wheel"; while the latter focuses on on-chain derivatives, allowing the decentralized protocol Hyperliquid to become the underlying infrastructure for Payward and its associated centralized exchange ecosystem, using on-chain protocols to support centralized businesses. Research briefs have emphasized that there are no direct connections between the two cooperations in publicly available information, nor is there any indication that they belong to a unified grand plan; they appear more like two different experimental lines illuminated at the same time.

The reason these two paths are being highlighted simultaneously is that the current landing of crypto infrastructure cannot be separated from the entry of traditional financial pipelines nor from the expansion of on-chain native capabilities. On the ACI–Circle side, they are inserting themselves into the settlement layer of banks and payment companies, which naturally has to undergo heavier regulatory scrutiny and moves at a slower pace. However, the reward is an opportunity to reach those users who are only familiar with local bank gateways but indifferent to on-chain addresses; on the Hyperliquid–Payward side, they leave the innovation space at the protocol layer and product design, being technically more flexible but are primarily facing participants active in centralized exchanges. One pushes dollar-denominated tokens toward traditional accounts and acquiring terminals, while the other pushes decentralized protocols toward exchange matching engines. They seem to be heading in opposite directions, but in reality, they complement each other: the former solves how funds can enter and exit on the regulatory-recognized track, while the latter explores what richer derivatives and trading experiences can be obtained on-chain with these funds. The real question the industry needs to answer is how future mainstream users' capital flows will form a division of labor and cycle between these two pipelines.

Who is Paving the Way for the Next Crypto Bull Market?

From the USDC payment demonstration in Colombia to Hyperliquid's on-chain derivatives cooperation with Payward, this round of infrastructure stories may not be noisy, but they are closer to the main battlefield: ACI Worldwide and Circle are trying to directly embed USDC and other dollar tokens into bank and payment system pipelines, while Hyperliquid opens its on-chain matching and risk engine to centralized entities like Payward associated with Kraken. Both paths point in the same direction—the next wave of growth will not rely on a single narrative but on the synergy of capital entry and on-chain trading layers. For investors and practitioners, what is truly worth keeping an eye on are not the promotional materials, but a few hard metrics: whether the regulators provide a clear stance, whether the cooperation has received tacit approval or authorization within the existing legal framework; after the demonstration and announcements, whether the real trading volume on-chain and off-chain continues to rise, rather than being a fleeting activity peak; in target markets like Latin America, the adoption speed of USDC payments at the account end, acquiring terminals, and merchant side, as well as whether the derivatives based on Hyperliquid infrastructure can accumulate a stable user base. If more listed payment companies, banks, and exchanges choose to outsource or co-build on-chain infrastructure in the future, the crypto payment and derivatives market will likely evolve into a layered structure of "compliant fiat in and out + on-chain liquidity and risk management." Ultimately, who paves the way for the next crypto bull market will be those cooperation cases that can find a balance among regulatory acceptance, real trading volume, and user adoption.

Join our community to discuss and grow stronger together!
AiCoin exclusive Hyperliquid benefits: https://app.hyperliquid.xyz/join/AICOIN88
AiCoin exclusive Aster benefits: https://www.asterdex.com/zh-CN/referral/9C50e2
On-chain Telegram community: https://t.me/AiCoinWhaleData
On-chain community: https://www.aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=N6OVMor5g
AiCoin on-chain Twitter: https://x.com/aicoinwhaledata

免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到[email protected]，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。