Ethereum actively pressed the “brake” on the test network, and SSV Labs announced a contraction in the duration of its custody services and development scope, both casting shadows almost simultaneously. The Glamsterdam upgrade, originally scheduled to activate on the Hoodi testnet on October 27, has been postponed by the Ethereum Foundation, with a new date yet to be determined; this upgrade was supposed to synchronize the execution layer Amsterdam with the consensus layer Gloas, while increasing Hoodi’s gas limit, but has been halted at the last moment due to the need for further study on the interaction effects of EIP-8037 with the mainnet smart contracts. On the other side, SSV Labs, as the core developer of the SSV Network, submitted the DIP-59 proposal, which aims to extend the network custody service period stipulated in DIP-31 from January 1, 2025, to June 30, 2027, while shrinking the work content from a more aggressive scaling development to a more conservative focus on custody and maintenance commitments.
These two seemingly independent signals related to technology and governance point toward a common thread: Ethereum's staking infrastructure is seeking a new balance between technological evolution and resource constraints. Airdrop Radar, while tracking these changes, considers them as references for the popularity and fundamentals of Ethereum ecosystem projects rather than any direct reward commitments; the delay of Glamsterdam implies that the upgrade pace and risk assessment are still being recalculated, while the extended custody period and development contraction in DIP-59 reflect the current market environment and the financial status of the DAO constraining the pace of construction. In this context, users of Airdrop Radar need to recalibrate their expectations for the staking track: the short-term path may be more tortuous, but the extended long-term service cycle and front-loaded risk control will become the backdrop for all subsequent participation decisions.
Combo Upgrade Paused
What was originally viewed as a bundled promotion of “execution layer + consensus layer + resource parameters” has now been pressed to pause. The community had already conducted expectation management regarding the activation of Glamsterdam on the Hoodi testnet on October 27: the Amsterdam execution layer and Gloas consensus layer were scheduled for simultaneous launch, while increasing Hoodi's gas limit meant that the entire chain link from contract execution to block production would be accelerated. However, as the date approached, the Ethereum Foundation chose to proactively postpone this upgrade, with a new activation date yet to be confirmed, citing the need for further investigation into the interaction effects between EIP-8037 and mainnet smart contracts, transforming what was originally considered a relatively "routine" testnet upgrade into a technical review focused on systemic risk.
The shift from the combined upgrade to the “brake” essentially represents a deliberate deceleration of the evolution rhythm between the execution layer and the consensus layer. The simultaneous activation of Amsterdam and Gloas has been canceled, and the gas limit increase has also been shelved, making Ethereum's linkage to enhance execution capabilities and adjust consensus mechanisms appear more conservative in the short term. For users of Airdrop Radar, this is not merely a postponement of a technical change; it is a clear signal of values: under the premise that critical changes could impact mainnet smart contract behavior, safety and caution take precedence over the speed of functional iteration. This will directly feedback into Airdrop Radar's fundamental assessment of Ethereum-related ecosystem projects—those strongly reliant on the "upcoming upgrade" narrative will have their popularity and story support re-evaluated, while projects placing greater emphasis on long-term safety boundaries and compatibility will gain relatively more attention in the current context.
From Airdrop Radar's perspective, the postponement of Glamsterdam does not equate to the disappearance of opportunities, but rather adds a prerequisite for all projects telling stories about Ethereum’s infrastructure: the technical timeline has uncertainty, and narratives must allow for a slowdown or even recalculation of pace. Users reading relevant project cards and tracking task paths need to treat "the new activation date has not yet been announced" as a core variable—only after a subsequent clarity about the upgrade timeline can the associated development routes and participation expectations potentially rise again; this will also become the most important background footnote in assessing airdrop opportunities within the Ethereum ecosystem.
SSV Labs Shifts to Custody
On the same timeline where Ethereum's upgrade schedule has been paused, SSV Labs has chosen a different way to “slow down”: through DIP-59, extending the SSV Network's custody service, originally agreed upon in DIP-31, from early 2025 directly to mid-2027. This is not merely about extending the timeline; it represents a prioritization of ensuring the staking infrastructure "stays alive," explicitly writing the operational assurance of the Ethereum staking protocol as a cross-cycle commitment. For users tracking the Ethereum staking track on Airdrop Radar, this means the project's narrative is no longer solely circling around "new features" and "new plays," but instead has gained a clear operational bottom line: this network is planned to run stably at least until mid-2027.
However, the cost of extending the timeline is clearly laid out in the same proposal: DIP-59 states that future work will be scaled back, shifting the development focus from scalability to custody and maintenance, which is a formal acknowledgment that resources no longer support aggressive iteration under the current market environment and DAO financial status. This contraction does not mean reverting to "doing nothing," but rather locking effort into ensuring that the network is usable, reliable, and sustainable. The changes in project popularity reflected by Airdrop Radar also mirror this attitude—short-term, the imaginative space around scalability development will converge, and the narrative focus will revert to "can this staking infrastructure run stably in the long term." Whether DIP-59 passes and whether the subsequent implementation follows this conservative route will become the key variable that users must closely monitor when evaluating participation opportunities related to SSV.
The Tug of Ethereum’s Staking Infrastructure
Shifting the perspective from a single project wider, one can find that Ethereum’s ecosystem has simultaneously pressed two kinds of "brakes" on the same timeline. On one end, the Ethereum Foundation has pressed pause on the Glamsterdam upgrade on the Hoodi testnet—originally planned to simultaneously activate the execution layer Amsterdam and the consensus layer Gloas, and to increase the gas limit, but chose to postpone it before the approaching date, citing the need for further research on the interaction effects of EIP-8037 with mainnet smart contracts, which reflects an extreme caution regarding protocol security and compatibility. On the other end, the core developer of SSV Network, SSV Labs, has extended the previously agreed custody service through DIP-59, pulling the network custody period from early 2025 to mid-2027, but clearly reducing scalability development within the same proposal, refocusing on custody and maintenance, responding more conservatively to the pressures from the current market environment and DAO financial status.
For decentralized staking infrastructure, these two choices create a clear tension: the protocol layer wishes to dissect potential risks carefully before each upgrade, preferring to slow progress rather than hastily push EIP-8037 onto the mainnet; meanwhile, the staking networks and DAOs above the protocol must ensure that services “last long” under a limited budget, even if it means sacrificing some new features and aggressive expansion. The former determines the speed and predictability of the evolution of Ethereum's underlying rules for the coming years, while the latter directly relates to whether staking protocols like SSV Network can operate stably until the end of the custody period, allowing participants to maintain confidence in their long-term staking strategies without the risk of being abruptly pulled out midcourse.
This line of tension will ultimately affect the pricing, incentive expectations, and narrative heat of projects within the staking track. Postponed upgrades and reduced development will temper the expectations surrounding “high growth” and “high incentives,” redirecting the market’s attention back to the fundamental question of whether this infrastructure can run stably through the designated custody period. For Airdrop Radar, these are not direct reward commitments, but rather essential background variables that must be considered when filtering Ethereum staking-related projects: when Glamsterdam restarts, the risk assessment trends of EIP-8037, the final direction of DIP-59, and its execution rigor will all influence subsequent changes in popularity and participation windows for the staking sector. This line of tension between technological progress and funding pressure will continue to shape the pace of Ethereum's staking infrastructure and serve as an important reference for Airdrop Radar in assessing related project participation windows.
Participation Expectations from Airdrop Radar’s Perspective
From the perspective of Airdrop Radar users, the Ethereum Foundation pressing the pause button on the Glamsterdam upgrade and SSV Labs extending the custody period through DIP-59 first reveals changes in “rhythm” and “safety boundaries,” rather than any directly quantifiable reward opportunities. The public information currently surrounding the postponement of upgrades and adjustments in custody largely focuses on the activation arrangements for the Hoodi testnet, the technical details of synchronizing upgrades to execution and consensus layers, the cautious evaluation of interactions between EIP-8037 and mainnet smart contracts, as well as the rewriting of timelines extending network custody services from 2025 to mid-2027, without touching on explicit airdrop or incentive plans. For users of Airdrop Radar, this means that the signals seen on the cards reflect the direction of the infrastructure layer, which will not transform into “guaranteed rewards” in the short term, but will subconsciously reshape everyone's understanding of the rhythm and risk exposure of participation in relevant projects.
This reshaping is specifically manifested in the differentiation of track popularity and narrative intensity. The postponement of Glamsterdam turns Ethereum's upgrade path from “accelerating” to “re-evaluation,” with the technical narrative touting the increase in gas limits and simultaneous activation of Amsterdam and Gloas potentially showing a decline or redistribution of discussion volume in Airdrop Radar's Ethereum ecosystem segment in the short term: some infrastructure projects that previously focused on upgrade speed might temporarily be classified by users as “awaiting confirmation.” On the other side, SSV Labs, by extending the timeline of network custody services to June 30, 2027, and explicitly shifting focus from scalability development to a more conservative approach of custody and maintenance in the proposal, can easily be understood under Airdrop Radar's perspective on the staking track as a signal of “running longer, but expanding slower.” The intertwining of technological upgrade slowdowns and extended custody shifts the perspective on participation expectations for staking-related projects more toward subjective evaluations of long-term stability and potential incentive space.
In this context, Airdrop Radar will not simply label the postponement of Glamsterdam or the extension of DIP-59’s custody as “positive” or “negative,” but will incorporate them into the framework for assessing the popularity and fundamentals of Ethereum ecosystem projects. Ethereum-related projects on the Airdrop Radar page are usually included in the observation list based on their sector, availability of public financing information, and recent changes in popularity; adjustments to the upgrade progress and custody service deadlines become explanatory variables behind those dimensions: an upgrade stall may indicate a rise in the prioritization of technical risk assessments, while an extended custody may imply that the DAO is opting for more stable resource allocation under current market conditions and financial constraints. In the absence of public tasks, reward parameters, or explicit timelines, Airdrop Radar treats such changes in the infrastructure layer as background information, helping users understand why certain projects’ attention heats up or cools down, rather than guiding users to treat these signals as single-direction judgments that can directly translate into anticipated profits.
Finding Opportunities Amid Caution and Resource Constraints
Ethereum pressing the brake on testnet upgrades and SSV Labs making contraction choices between custody deadlines and development scope together outline the survival logic of infrastructure projects in the current cycle: one end is a cautious assessment of the interaction risks between EIP-8037 and mainnet contracts, preferring to postpone the activation of Glamsterdam on Hoodi without giving a new date; the other end, under market and DAO financial constraints, is extending custody services to mid-2027 through DIP-59 while actively reducing scalability development, concentrating resources on network custody and maintenance. Both parties publicly place the emphasis on safety and service continuity upfront, indicating that the protocols genuinely worth long-term attention are not necessarily the fastest-moving ones, but those that can still provide verifiable timelines and duty commitments under pressure.
For Airdrop Radar users, opportunities should not be understood as “betting on a timely upgrade landing” or “wagering on whether a single governance proposal can pass,” but rather as screening for staking and infrastructure protocols that maintain long-term commitments under caution and resource pressure through these signals of retreat and advance. The new activation date for Glamsterdam has yet to be determined, and future announcements will directly rewrite the expected timeline for upgrades to Ethereum's execution and consensus layers; DIP-59 is currently still in the submission stage and has not yet entered the public disclosure phase of voting results and specific budget details. Airdrop Radar will take these two timelines as dynamic references, adjusting the observation priorities for related Ethereum staking and infrastructure projects alongside the subsequent communication rhythms of the Ethereum Foundation and SSV Labs, helping users continuously calibrate their cyclical judgments regarding participation expectations, rather than being led by single technical nodes or proposal titles.
Join our community, let’s discuss together and become stronger!
AiCoin exclusive Hyperliquid benefits: https://app.hyperliquid.xyz/join/AICOIN88
AiCoin exclusive Aster benefits: https://www.asterdex.com/zh-CN/referral/9C50e2
On-chain Telegram community: https://t.me/AiCoinWhaleData
On-chain community: https://www.aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=N6OVMor5g
AiCoin on-chain Twitter: https://x.com/aicoinwhaledata
免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到[email protected]，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。
