Starting from October 11, 2026, a wallet address regarded as a whale or institution has drawn a clear rebalancing trajectory in just 11 days: continuously selling BTC and increasing its position in ETH. According to publicly compiled blockchain data, this address sold approximately 1,847.3 BTC in 11 days while buying over 63,000 ETH, specifically reported by Odaily as 63,731. The day before the report, it sold about 246.2 BTC again, equivalent to approximately $20.36 million at that time, and purchased about 10,636 ETH. On-chain analysis indicated that its path involved first converting BTC to about 153 million USDC, and then using USDC to buy ETH. Almost simultaneously, Musk disclosed during SpaceX's third-quarter earnings call that the boards of SpaceX and Tesla have established a special committee composed of independent directors to evaluate the possibility of a merger between the two companies. According to Decrypt, cited by Foresight News, if this merger ultimately materializes, the current combined total of approximately 30,221 BTC, worth about $2.5 billion, will be consolidated into a single balance sheet, forming a unified corporate Bitcoin treasury. However, this merger is still at an evaluation stage with no definitive timeline or conclusion. As an on-chain whale has been actively choosing between BTC and ETH, whether large funds are quietly diverging in their allocation logic between these two major assets or will return to the same direction has become the most pressing signal to inquire about at the moment.
11 Days Selling 1847 BTC: The Full Process of Whale Rebalancing
Beginning on October 11, this address seen as a "whale/institution" by on-chain analysts has pulled out an extremely clear rebalancing trajectory: according to multiple Chinese media outlets citing data from Yujin, in the subsequent 11 days, it sold a total of about 1,847.3 BTC, and correspondingly bought over 63,000 ETH (specifically reported by Odaily as 63,731). The trades were not completed at once but were executed in a sustained and staggered manner, with each minor fluctuation carried out under the same logic, forming an asset exchange process with stable timing within a concentrated time window, which is hard to interpret as incidental noise.
On a more detailed path, Odaily quoted Yujin data stating that this whale did not directly hedge ETH with BTC, but first converted BTC to approximately 153 million USDC, and then used USDC to gradually buy ETH, forming a "BTC→USDC→ETH" intermediary chain; it should be emphasized that this funding path has only been publicly reported from a single source and has yet to be cross-verified by multiple parties. A day before the report, this address also sold approximately 246.2 BTC (about $2.036 million) and bought around 10,636 ETH, indicating that the rebalancing action was not finished but continued under the same strategic framework, making the entire on-chain trajectory appear more like a rebalancing plan with preset proportions and rhythms rather than a temporary retreat driven by emotion.
From Bitcoin to Ethereum: What This Rebalancing Reveals
From the perspective of asset rebalancing, this address sold about 1,847.3 BTC over the past 11 days while buying over 63,000 ETH, essentially making a substantial weight switch between the two major mainstream assets. If the "BTC→USDC→ETH" chain mentioned in the report is true, the counterpart did not directly swap BTC for ETH on an exchange, but converted BTC into about 153 million USDC first, and then gradually accessed ETH with USDC, which is closer to a designed rhythm for asset replacement. From a risk appetite perspective, such operations could imply that at this stage, the address is more willing to bear the technical and ecological risks associated with ETH, reducing exposure to BTC as a "collateral asset," and shifting the narrative from value storage to expectations of growth in protocols and applications. However, all of this can only be seen as a possible interpretation rather than a confirmation of true intent.
It is important to emphasize that this is still just a rebalancing sample of a single whale or institutional address. On-chain data has not revealed its longer-term holding structure and strategic style, and it remains unclear whether it is a traditional institution, a fund account, or a large trading team. Current public reports also do not provide broader market participants' quantitative evidence of synchronized position adjustments between BTC and ETH, so we cannot elevate this hedging movement of 1,847.3 BTC and 63,000 ETH to a so-called "market-wide rotation" conclusion. For readers, a more reasonable approach is to view it as a clear yet opaque on-chain trajectory, acknowledging its signal strength while accepting that it is merely an isolated large rebalancing case, not the final answer for the entire market direction.
Musk's Merger Assessment: 30,221 BTC May Be Concentrated on One Balance Sheet
Just before this whale address drew its rebalancing curve, Musk confirmed during SpaceX's third-quarter earnings call that both SpaceX and Tesla's boards have established special committees composed of independent directors to evaluate the possibility of a merger between the two companies. According to a report from Decrypt, cited by Foresight News, looking only at the publicly disclosed asset side, these two companies currently hold approximately 30,221 BTC, worth about $2.5 billion at current prices. If the merger indeed takes place, these BTC will be consolidated onto the same balance sheet in an accounting sense, becoming a significant Bitcoin treasury under a single corporate entity. However, the merger is still at the "evaluation" stage at this point, with key details such as regulatory approval, transaction structure, and specific timelines undisclosed, and we cannot presumptively predict any inevitable outcomes beyond the publicly available information.
Even so, the idea of concentrating accounting for 30,221 BTC itself carries narrative impact: on one side, the on-chain whale is rapidly rebalancing in an anonymous address, while on the other side, Musk’s team is discussing how to solidify Bitcoin within the corporate asset structure at the board level. The former represents agile mobility of capital at the protocol level, while the latter serves as a governance choice elevating Bitcoin to "treasury asset" status. If more similar enterprise-level coin consolidation cases emerge in the future, the long-term story of Bitcoin may gradually shift from "individual speculation and hedging tool" to including the chapter of "formally incorporated into the balance sheets of large companies," and this symbolic transformation itself is worth continued observation.
Reducing Positions While Building a Treasury: The Bitcoin Divergence of Large Funds
On one side, the on-chain address has rhythmically sold about 1,847.3 BTC in 11 days, converting to around 153 million USDC to buy over 63,000 ETH; it was reported that in the latest transaction, it also sold about 246.2 BTC in a single day and bought about 10,636 ETH, clearly placing Bitcoin in the position of "transaction asset that can be actively rebalanced." On the other side, if SpaceX and Tesla do merge in the future, approximately 30,221 BTC, worth about $2.5 billion, would be unified under a single balance sheet, regarded as a "long-term reserve asset" at the corporate level. The former reflects the position choices of a single address amidst market volatility, while the latter represents a financial structure design driven by the board and independent directors. These two signals parallel in time but have almost no comparability in decision-making subjects, risk considerations, and governance logic, and there is no confirmed direct causal relationship.
From the perspective of large funds, Bitcoin is being split into two roles: for addresses actively doing BTC→ETH rebalancing, it resembles a volatility tool that can be reduced or given way to other sectors at any time; while in discussions within Musk's enterprises, the approximately 30,221 BTC is presumed to be concentratable and suitable for long-term holding as treasury assets. One expresses preference through on-chain trading behavior, while the other expresses a position through corporate governance and financial planning. What they collectively outline is precisely two sides of the same asset—Bitcoin can be treated as a risk exposure requiring dynamic adjustments, or be locked in a corporate treasury, becoming a reserve capable of being held long-term by large entities.
What’s Next for BTC and ETH after the Whales and Musk
There are only a few facts confirmable from this round of on-chain trajectory: starting from October 11, over the course of about 11 days, this address regarded as a whale or institution sold approximately 1,847.3 BTC and bought over 63,000 ETH, still continuing this rhythm a day before the report, selling about 246.2 BTC and buying around 10,636 ETH; according to data cited by Odaily from Yujin, this address exchanged BTC for about 153 million USDC and then used that to buy ETH. On the enterprise side, the merger of SpaceX and Tesla is still in the evaluation stage conducted by the special committee of independent directors, and external parties can only discuss the possibility of unifying the accounting into a single corporate treasury based on the media disclosure of approximately 30,221 BTC worth about $2.5 billion. In narrative terms, the former is repricing the risks and growth space of two major assets through continuous BTC→ETH rebalancing, while the latter places Bitcoin within the discussion of the board and balance sheets, providing a hypothetical scenario for long-term corporate holding. The briefing has already set the available numerical boundaries, and whether it can evolve from a single address to a broader rebalancing trend depends on whether this whale fund stops or reverses its operations, whether more similar addresses emerge, and whether new on-chain signals resonate. Moreover, the Musk merger must wait for the evaluation results, transaction structures, and timelines to be genuinely made public before the ownership of about 30,221 BTC can transform from hypothesis into case. In the absence of broader quantitative data and verified information, readers need to deliberately suppress fantasies about a single address and an unfinalized merger plan, treating them as open questions that require ongoing tracking rather than already written answers.
Join our community to discuss it together and become stronger!
Exclusive Hyperliquid benefits for AiCoin: https://app.hyperliquid.xyz/join/AICOIN88
Exclusive Aster benefits for AiCoin: https://www.asterdex.com/zh-CN/referral/9C50e2
On-chain Telegram community: https://t.me/AiCoinWhaleData
On-chain community: https://www.aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=N6OVMor5g
AiCoin on-chain Twitter: https://x.com/aicoinwhaledata
免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到[email protected]，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。
