Around October 20, 2025, a set of conflicting signals emerged on the Bitcoin chain: according to a single source's statistics, addresses holding 1,000-10,000 BTC, known as "whale" addresses, flipped from a net holding of approximately -62,600 BTC that had been continually distributed over the past 60 days, to a quiet reversal of approximately +5,230 BTC in accumulation. The narrative of seller exhaustion and "left-side accumulation" was brought back to the table. However, on the price and transaction levels, it was described during the same period that spot demand remained weak, especially with the lack of synchronized strengthening in US buying, creating a contrast with the changes in the underlying position structure. Even more bizarre, according to the same source, Binance's USDT reserves surged from about $790 million to approximately $1.76 billion during this time, significantly increasing the liquidity available on the exchange, yet this did not translate into a clear spot trend. In this context, where macro funds are disconnected from whale behavior, the high-leverage synthetic perpetual protocol Papertrade based on HyperEVM suddenly announced that the PAPER token will not allow external contract transfers in the short term and simultaneously adjusted transaction fees and minting curves to prevent external perpetual contracts from shorting PAPER and manipulating the protocol's liquidity pool. This design was quickly interpreted by the media as "the exit path for loss mining being blocked," triggering panic within the community regarding liquidity and exit mechanisms. Relevant pre-contracts for PAPER were reportedly delisted by multiple parties, and platform data was reported to be significantly declining, yet lacked concrete numerical evidence. During the same period, the transition of whales from net distribution to net accumulation, the surge in exchange USDT reserves, and the liquidity and public opinion crisis ignited by the limitation on PAPER transfers occurred simultaneously. Without cross-validation from multiple sources, these interrelated on-chain signals were juxtaposed as a typical case of directional divergence and risk resonance.

Whales Stop Selling and Start Buying: Bitcoin Positions Quietly Reverse

In the same time window, a quieter clue on the Bitcoin chain was the slow reversal of whale positions from net distribution to net accumulation. According to a single source, analyst XWIN Japan combined statistics from CryptoQuant and pointed out that over the past 60 days, addresses holding 1,000-10,000 BTC saw a net change rise from approximately -62,600 BTC to about +5,230 BTC. This means that the same type of large addresses transitioned from continuous liquidation to a slight overall increase in holdings over a two-month period, interrupting the seller-dominated narrative with accumulation behavior.

This reversal is seen by some on-chain analysts as a signal of "seller exhaustion": when whales accustomed to distribution at high prices stop collectively selling and begin to accumulate again before price has clearly reversed, the market is depicted as transitioning from continued selling pressure to possibly touching the bottom. However, this judgment heavily relies on a single data source, and whether the statistics excluded key information such as exchange aggregation addresses and the precise start and end dates of the 60-day interval has not been fully disclosed or systemically verified by other platforms. More importantly, there is no simple linear causal relationship between whale behavior and public price performance; what we currently see is merely a record of position direction changes on-chain. Whether this will evolve into a prelude to establishing a bottom or a brief technical adjustment still requires time and more multidimensional data for verification.

Spot Buying Weakens and Binance USDT Reserves Surge

During the same phase when whales re-accumulated chips on-chain, front-end spot demand was described as clearly weakening. The materials particularly emphasized that the spot buying from the US did not simultaneously "thicken"; the market more showed a passive acceptance of price against selling pressure, rather than an active influx of funds competing for high prices. This hesitation on the spot front created a subtle misalignment with the slow accumulation seen at the address level: on one side, large amounts of chips shifted from distribution to collection, while on the other side, the public market lacked sustained strength willing to stand at buy one and buy two.

In this context, according to a single source, Binance's USDT reserves increased from approximately $790 million to about $1.76 billion during the same period, significantly increasing the "dry powder" available on the exchange. The surge in reserves can be interpreted in various ways: it may suggest that a substantial amount of capital is choosing to stay in exchange wallets to watch and wait for clearer trend signals; or it could simply be an advance preparation of margin and market-making ammunition to respond to potential sharp volatility. However, the materials did not provide any net inflow/outflow data for US spot ETFs, nor quantitative metrics such as regional price differences and spot premiums. Whether funds truly transitioned from "prepared state" to substantive buying lacked direct evidence on-chain and at the transaction level. All we can do now is juxtapose whale accumulation, weakening spot buying, and surging USDT reserves into a narrative framework rather than simply attributing them to already verified trend signals.

Papertrade Blocks PAPER Transfers to Prevent Manipulation

In this "funds prepared but buying hesitant" macro background, according to a single source, the high-leverage synthetic perpetual protocol Papertrade deployed on HyperEVM locked its core token with a new restriction. The official announcement around October 2025 stated that if external perpetual contracts could short PAPER, the risk of manipulating the protocol's liquidity pool would significantly increase. Thus, they temporarily restricted external transfers of PAPER tokens and simultaneously adjusted transaction fees and minting curves. In other words, all major pricing battles related to PAPER were forced to be confined within the internal settlement system of the protocol, viewed as a potential attack surface and temporarily excluded from external markets.

This step is structurally not a simple "technical optimization." High-leverage synthesis essentially amplifies external price fluctuations exponentially onto position gains and liquidity pool pressures through a set of internal pricing curves and margin mechanisms; under extreme market conditions, even slight price movements could quickly escalate into a chain reaction of liquidations and liquidity exhaustion. If an natively protocol token that can be concentrated on the external market is added, the internal liquidity pool could lose its initiative in the cycles of "external pricing pressure - internal margin deterioration - passive liquidation." Papertrade's choice to block external transfers of PAPER, from an on-chain perspective, directly reduces the price transmission path within this cycle, compressing the token's liquidity and gaming space within the protocol-controlled range. This represents a strong constraint on the structure of price gaming rather than a neutral parameter adjustment.

PAPER Miners' Exit Path Blocked and Pre-contracts Delisted

According to media reports, after the announcement of the non-transferable policy for PAPER, community sentiment quickly turned into a strong rebound, with many holders interpreting it as "locking in the exit path” during the mining phase. The so-called "exit path for loss mining being blocked" refers to the situation where, during unfavorable price movements, participants could originally reduce their positions, lock in losses, and reallocate risks through transfers or sales in the secondary market. However, now the minted PAPER is restricted within the contract system and cannot be transferred out or find counterparties in the external market, forcing holders to passively endure price fluctuations and subsequent arrangements of the protocol. This shift from "able to stop-loss at any time" to "can only wait" quickly escalated into doubts about the boundaries of contractual authority and the intentions of the project, with negative public sentiment escalating from mere emotional dissatisfaction to a broader trust crisis regarding the entire mechanism.

The chain reaction did not stop at the community level. It was reported that multiple platforms consecutively delisted pre-contracts related to PAPER, withdrawing the originally anticipated external trading around this token. The data on the Papertrade platform itself was also described as showing a significant decline, yet specific dimensions and values were not provided in public materials. From the perspective of on-chain risk, when the protocol's design blocks token liquidity and shuts down exit channels, participants' perception of losses is no longer merely a paper loss but becomes a structural anxiety of being "trapped in an unadjustable position." Once this anxiety combines with the delisting of pre-contracts and the contraction of external pricing channels, the PAPER ecosystem quickly evolves from a technical measure to prevent shorting into a structural controversy surrounding exit paths and control.

Whale Accumulation and DeFi Design Fiasco Signals

Looking back at this time anchor around October 20, 2025, the net accumulation of Bitcoin whales turning from negative to positive was interpreted by a single analysis source as a signal of "seller exhaustion beginning to test the bottom." Meanwhile, the weak US spot buying and the Binance USDT reserves rising from approximately $790 million to about $1.76 billion formed another narrative clue of "chips waiting outside" — together, this seems more like a gaming period between whales and external funds, as well as a collective pause in market observation. Juxtaposed with this are Papertrade's decision to block external transfers of PAPER to prevent external shorting, resulting in public sentiment regarding "loss mining with no exit" and causing the delisting of pre-contracts, which turned the token economic issues of high-leverage DeFi from the abstract "mechanism risk" into a collective debate on locked exit paths on-chain. The upcoming on-chain variables that are genuinely worth tracking are clear: whether the net accumulation of whale addresses holding 1,000-10,000 BTC continues, whether spot demand starts to show quantifiable signs of recovery, and whether PAPER makes verifiable adjustments at the governance and parameters level in response to this turmoil, while all these judgments currently can only be pieced together based on limited publicly available data and a single source, and more complete on-chain evidence in the future may well correct our overall narrative of this phase.

Join our community, let's discuss and grow stronger together!
AiCoin's exclusive Hyperliquid benefits: https://app.hyperliquid.xyz/join/AICOIN88
AiCoin's exclusive Aster benefits: https://www.asterdex.com/zh-CN/referral/9C50e2
On-chain Telegram community: https://t.me/AiCoinWhaleData
On-chain community: https://www.aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=N6OVMor5g
AiCoin's on-chain Twitter: https://x.com/aicoinwhaledata

免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到[email protected]，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。