On October 16, during the policy window between the September FOMC and the meetings in October and December, Federal Reserve Chairman Waller stepped in and pressed the "pause button" on the market's attempts to lock in a path early. On one hand, he reiterated that the Fed's fundamental goal remains achieving price stability and confirmed that the global situation has largely met expectations since the September FOMC; on the other hand, he explicitly opposed making premature conclusions about the outcomes of future meetings, emphasizing that there are still several key meetings this year, which will be judged again in October and December. At the same time, he candidly admitted that he might be overly sensitive to the shadow of a global financial crisis, revealing a cautious policy style towards systemic risks. This deliberate maintenance of ambiguity in interest rates and liquidity expectations came alongside his announcement of a live hearing on artificial intelligence in the San Francisco Bay Area on November 16 — signifying that technological transformation is officially brought into the "price + financial stability" discussion framework, suggesting that expectations of technological regulation will begin to shape risk premiums alongside monetary policy. In such an environment, high-beta assets like BTC and ETH, which are highly sensitive to interest rate expectations, U.S. dollar liquidity, and risk preferences, are both seen as macro hedging tools and positioned at the crossroads of growth assets and the repricing of technological regulation: with simultaneous uncertainties from central banks and the extension of technological regulation, how the risk preferences in the crypto market, the demand for U.S. dollar-denominated assets, and the trading structures of on-chain funds will adjust becomes the overarching pricing theme in the coming months.

Price Stability and Silent Guidance: Interest Rate Expectations in Limbo

In his speech on October 16, Waller tied together two seemingly contradictory signals: on one hand, he reaffirmed that the global situation has "largely met expectations" since the September FOMC and that the Fed's core goal remains achieving price stability; on the other hand, he clearly opposed making any definitive conclusions about the outcomes before the October and December meetings. For interest rate traders, this essentially communicated to the market: the inflation anchor remains strong, but how the path unfolds will have to wait for the meetings themselves. The September FOMC merely provided a baseline framework, which should have been continuously "filled with details" by tools like federal funds futures and U.S. Treasury yields, while Waller's silent guidance deliberately left blanks in the future rhythm of the high-interest environment, preventing the market from prematurely locking in a timeline for rate cuts or further tightening.

During this policy window, the direct result of interest rate paths being left in limbo is that the discount rate itself becomes drift-prone: the implied trajectory of federal funds futures is more sensitive to every macro cue, and U.S. Treasury yields tend to amplify risk-averse or risk-taking sentiments in the absence of clear forward guidance. This uncertainty transmits to expectations of U.S. dollar liquidity, creating an "extra discount" on risk asset valuations, especially for those considered long duration and high-beta sectors. For BTC and ETH, past cycles have shown that they are both highly sensitive to real interest rates and U.S. dollar liquidity, and can easily overshoot in times dominated by sentiment; now, in a scenario where interest rate range expectations are deliberately left in limbo, on-chain funds find it difficult to build mid- to long-term positions around a stable discount rate, prompting trading structures to tilt towards shorter durations and higher flexibility in positioning, leading to increased volatility of crypto assets driven more by interpretations of central bank tones and slight changes in risk preferences.

The Shadow of Crisis Lingers: Waller's Risk Aversion Backdrop

In his speech on October 16, Waller proactively admitted that he "might be too sensitive to the shadow left by the global financial crisis," which is not merely self-deprecation, but rather lays bare his personal policy backdrop to the market. Since the global financial crisis, the Fed and regulatory institutions have institutionalized their vigilance toward systemic risks and cross-market chain reactions; Waller's style is characteristic of this generation of central bank officials: he would prefer to remain vigilant even when bubbles have not yet formed rather than allowing markets to self-correct in an excessively loose environment with overly optimistic risk pricing. Therefore, when he emphasizes the goal of price stability while rejecting any commitments about future meeting outcomes, he conveys not a message of "neutrality," but a signal of "I am always ready to slam the brakes when financial conditions become excessively loose," compelling the market to embed a higher risk premium in pricing, naturally compressing the optimistic space for high-leverage and high-beta assets.

This risk-averse discourse's transmission path is not unfamiliar in the historical performance of the crypto market: during phases of elevated risk premiums, leverage positions both on-chain and off-chain tend to contract proactively, high-frequency speculation and short-term follow-through trading cool down, and the trading structure shifts from "amplifying positions as much as possible" to "controlling drawdowns as much as possible." BTC and ETH are re-priced in this environment: the former's "digital gold" narrative is reassessed by some funds for its hedging properties against macro uncertainty, being more seen as a long-term insurance chip in the dual fog of interest rates and financial stability; the latter, along with higher beta tokens, resembles growth assets needing additional risk premium compensation. The shadow of crisis in Waller's rhetoric ultimately translates to a more cautious funding world — lighter leverage, shorter durations, and more selective risk preferences, with each fluctuation in crypto assets needing to be re-evaluated under this tightening psychological rate.

San Francisco AI Hearing: The Tug-of-War Between Technology Bubbles and Financial Stability

After Waller re-centered monetary policy around the tone of "price stability and risk vigilance," he introduced a new coordinate: the Federal Reserve will hold a live hearing on artificial intelligence in the San Francisco Bay Area on November 16. The monetary authority proactively invites AI into public discussion, moving beyond a simple two-dimensional trade-off between interest rates, employment, and inflation expectations, acknowledging that technological change itself has become a third variable affecting financial stability and the transmission of prices. This time, the Federal Reserve is not discussing cutting-edge innovations in a certain industry but is trying to clarify: when algorithmic trading, credit risk control, and risk modeling are all deeply driven by AI, is systemic risk being dispersed, or is it concentrated in a few models and platforms after being disguised? For a chair who admits to being "possibly still influenced by the shadow of the global financial crisis," AI is seen as a tech factor that could amplify market volatility and accelerate market breakdowns, rather than a neutral productivity tool.

This extension directly pulls tech growth stocks and risk assets highly bound to tech narratives into the Fed's sight. This hearing in San Francisco will often be interpreted in the market context as a signal of "increasing expectations of technological regulation": when AI is seen as a potential threat to financial stability, it becomes difficult to continue lowering the risk premium on high-valuation growth sectors. Historically, the crypto market and tech growth stocks have exhibited high correlations at multiple stages, often pricing BTC, ETH, and high-beta tech portfolios in the same risk bucket; once expectations for tech regulation strengthen, the overall valuation of high-valuation sectors gets compressed, leading to upward adjustments in the required returns for such crypto assets, naturally shrinking leverage and duration. Therefore, the hearing in San Francisco in November is essentially a concentrated calibration of the risk premium for technology bubbles and will become one of the key references for the crypto market to reprice its macro role.

The Dual Identity of BTC and ETH: The Hedge Narrative Against High-Beta Attributes

After Waller pressed the "pause button" on expectations, the identity conflict of BTC and ETH was brought to a more glaring position. On one hand, they have been shaped over the years into positions likened to "digital gold," "anti-inflation," and "hedges against risks in the monetary system" — in front of a central bank whose highest goal is price stability but has yet to provide a clear path for rate cuts, such narratives are instead amplified: if interest rates remain high for an extended period and the pressures on the monetary system will only explode at some point in the future, then holding macro hedging chips in advance seems reasonable. On the other hand, historical price actions relentlessly remind traders: in past cycles, BTC and ETH have shown strong correlations with high-beta growth assets like Nasdaq, behaving more like part of the "tech risk bucket" in both pullbacks and rebounds, rather than as pure hedging tools independent of risk preferences.

It is precisely this dual identity, in an environment where Waller's cautious signals and policy uncertainties overlap with expectations of technological regulation, that continuously drives funds to switch back and forth within the crypto market: when concerns about prices and systemic risks prevail, funds are willing to view part of the BTC and ETH positions as hedging allocations; once the reality of high-interest rates and uncertain pacing of rate cuts suppresses growth premiums, combined with the regulatory shadows represented by the November San Francisco AI hearing, the same assets are quickly seen as high-beta chips, becoming targets for reduction and hedging. For trading structures, this oscillation is directly reflected in duration and leverage — funds tend to shorten holding periods, lower perpetual contract leverage, and shift more risk to options volatility trading and cross-asset spreads related to U.S. stocks and the U.S. dollar index, using hedging and arbitrage to capture expected volatility, rather than gambling on faith with high leverage in a single direction. Before Waller's cautious framework provides a clear interest rate path, BTC and ETH are being treated more as sensitive amplifiers of macro and regulatory expectations rather than as singular "safe assets."

Trading in the Central Bank Mist: Which Signals Should the Crypto Market Focus On

This time, Waller deliberately turned the interest rate path into a "gray area," providing no pre-commitment for the October and December meetings, which macroscopically means two changes: first, the short- and medium-long-term interest rate expectations are forced to be repriced repeatedly with data and speeches, with policy uncertainty itself becoming a variable; second, under his admission of possibly being "too sensitive to the shadow of the global financial crisis," the market is likely to pay a higher risk premium for systemic risk vigilance; third, the Federal Reserve has pulled artificial intelligence into the live hearing agenda, raising overall expectations for regulation on high-leverage tech and growth assets. These three points together construct a framework for BTC and ETH to "trade in the central bank mist": not only monitoring the next interest rate decision, but also tracking the slope and volatility of implied paths of interest rate futures, the strength and weakness of the dollar, and the changing expectations of technological regulation, to judge whether they are in the risk preference range of being "used as high-beta growth assets" or "used as macro hedging tools." On a practical operational level, one should view the strength of the central bank's verbal statements, dot plots, and the repricing of terminal rates and rate cut timelines via interest rate futures as signals for adjusting leverage and duration; consider the November 16 AI hearing and subsequent directions in tech regulation as a thermometer for the risk premium in growth sectors; monitor the rotations of on-chain funds between BTC/ETH and other high-risk tokens, along with the net inflows and outflows across exchanges and off-market channels, as real-time images of funding preferences. What truly matters is not betting on the "hawkish or dovish" conclusion of a particular meeting, but continuously reading how these signals shape the three curves of interest rates, the U.S. dollar, and regulation in the intentionally blank spaces created by central banks, and then pricing the macro risks that crypto assets should bear accordingly.

Join our community to discuss and become stronger together!
AiCoin exclusive Hyperliquid benefits: https://app.hyperliquid.xyz/join/AICOIN88
AiCoin exclusive Aster benefits: https://www.asterdex.com/zh-CN/referral/9C50e2
On-chain Telegram community: https://t.me/AiCoinWhaleData
On-chain community: https://www.aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=N6OVMor5g
AiCoin on-chain Twitter: https://x.com/aicoinwhaledata

免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到[email protected]，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。