On October 15, 2026, BitMEX co-founder Arthur Hayes threw out a seemingly understated yet highly impactful macro post on social media X. He did not take a side like most people do: either firmly believing that AI trading will eventually burst into a bubble or confidently asserting it is a technologically driven long-term boom. Hayes candidly admitted that he is uncertain whether AI-related assets will ultimately crash or not, and he will not bet on either side—because in his view, what is truly worth trading is not "whether AI will collapse," but rather "the moment if it does collapse, the government and central banks might inject trillions of dollars to bail out the market." Based on this hypothesis, he provided an extremely straightforward trading answer: Long $BTC $ETH. He does not make any determinations about the eventual outcome of AI trading, but once systemic risks emerge, triggering trillions in liquidity injections, crypto assets like Bitcoin and Ethereum will become the biggest beneficiaries; this is the logic behind his bet on the next bull market. On the same day, Chinese media outlets like Golden Financial, Odaily Planet Daily, and BlockBeats quickly relayed this post, and the narrative of "AI bubble—trillions in bailouts—crypto bull market" rapidly spread within the Chinese community, leading Hayes's public bullish stance to be seen as an early macro gamble.

Not betting on an AI crash, betting on trillions in bailouts

In this post, Hayes almost entirely avoided the binary debate over "whether AI will crash." He candidly acknowledged that he is unsure whether AI trading will eventually result in a bubble burst or continue surging, and he will not bet on either side. For him, what really matters is not the price path itself, but how the government's and central banks' "policy response function" will act when that path becomes extreme: if systemic risks really do explode from AI-related assets, the result could be a bailout of trillions of dollars, and this is the core event he sees as potentially tradable in advance.

This mindset stands in stark contrast to traditional investors who tend to bet on "whether or not there will be a crash." Many people in discussions about AI either firmly believe this is the start of a new golden age of technology or quietly wait to pick up bargains after a bubble burst, while Hayes's perspective transcends the fate of individual assets, focusing instead on the potential for large-scale liquidity injections at the macro level. Thus, in the same post, he did not offer an opinion on any specific AI assets but instead directly provided his trading direction: go long BTC, ETH, viewing Bitcoin and Ethereum as the main beneficiaries of the future bailout torrent. In his trading philosophy, whether AI rises or falls first is merely a triggering condition; what is truly worth pre-positioning is the likely arrival of trillions in bailouts once risks explode.

From AI asset bubble to bailout liquidity flood

In Hayes's vision, the first act of the story has already begun: around AI concept stocks, computing power infrastructure, and various "AI trading strategies," the global market is highly enthusiastic, with ongoing debates about whether valuations are too high and whether the bubble zone has been entered. He is not trying to bet on the outcome of this debate, but rather has built a longer transmission chain—if this AI asset frenzy ultimately evolves into a crash that triggers systemic risk, then the next act is likely to be the "government or central bank" stepping in, using as much as trillions of dollars in bailouts to stabilize the situation. This is not a precise timetable but a macro hypothesis based on historical experience: when a new asset bubble bursts and confidence collapses, the party with the power to issue currency and fiscal authority is always in the best position to fill the gap.

The method of bailout in his narrative can be simply summarized as one term: liquidity flood. Whether through a loose monetary environment or expansionary fiscal spending, this ultimately means large amounts of funds are being pushed back into the market, and history has repeatedly shown that such operations often drive up the prices of various risk assets. At the end of this chain, he focuses on Bitcoin and Ethereum: when the traditional market faces a necessary trillion-dollar bailout due to the burst of the AI bubble, some of the newly added or re-released funds will not stay in low-yield, safe assets, but will seek out known risk exposures with imaginative potential. BTC and ETH play the role of "mainline assets" in the crypto world; they naturally symbolize the macro narrative and possess enough size and depth to absorb the resulting liquidity. This is the core logic behind why Hayes believes they will become the main beneficiaries of the bailout flood.

Arthur Hayes's macro narrative and AI controversy

In the macro trading circle and crypto industry, Arthur Hayes is not only the co-founder of BitMEX but also a long-time active front-line trader and opinion leader. His public positions and macro judgments are naturally viewed as "tradable narratives." On October 15, 2026, when he raised this set of points about AI trading and trillion-dollar bailouts on X, the Chinese media collectively amplified and relayed it on the same day, signaling that the market is not merely forwarding one person's opinion but scrambling for a macro story framework that might govern the next few years.

This chain narrative of "AI bubble—bailout—crypto bull market" is not a brand new story created out of thin air by him, but rather extends from his consistent macro perspective: instead of betting on the binary question of "will AI crash," it is more prudent to bet directly on policy responses and liquidity expansion. He explicitly stated in the post that he is uncertain whether AI trading will eventually crash and will not pick a side to guess peaks or advocate for a bullish stance, but instead chooses to trade a more certain outcome—once AI-related assets do trigger a substantial adjustment, it is highly likely that the government or central bank will propose a bailout plan amounting to trillions of dollars, and this liquidity injection will favor Bitcoin and Ethereum. In his narrative, the crash is no longer just an endpoint of risk but becomes a catalyst that triggers the bailout button, turning into a precursor event driving the BTC and ETH bull market. This macro reconstruction of rewriting a "disaster scenario" as an "uptrend point" is also the root cause of the intense discussion around his viewpoints in the market.

Influential leader bullish on BTC, ETH

After connecting the thread of "AI bubble—trillions in bailouts—crypto bull market," Hayes provided the most actionable conclusion: Long $BTC $ETH. On October 15, 2026, he clearly wrote on X about his trading direction to go long Bitcoin and Ethereum, and on that day, Chinese media outlets like Golden Financial, Odaily Planet Daily, and BlockBeats almost unanimously included these four characters in their headlines, directly packaging a personal position preference into a market signal that can quickly circulate in social networks and communities. In the crypto industry, Hayes's identity as not only the co-founder of BitMEX but also as an opinion leader who voices out at critical points in cycles makes his public stance on BTC and ETH interpreted by many as a signal that mainstream assets will be the primary beneficiaries in future possible trillion-dollar bailouts, rather than obscure AI concepts or long-tail coins on the margins of liquidity.

However, this signal currently remains more at the emotional level rather than a conclusion validated by funds. As of the day of his statement, there was no rigorously cross-verified data to prove that this post immediately changed the price trajectory of BTC and ETH; it belongs to the macro trading narrative rather than an on-chain event or policy implementation. For readers, Hayes's "Long $BTC $ETH" serves more as an amplifier to help understand mainstream consensus: it reinforces the expectation that "the bailout market will first raise mainstream assets" but cannot replace the observation and prudent assessment of actual capital inflows. Treating this statement as a hypothesis and scenario worthy of study rather than a rule to blindly follow with leverage is the relatively rational approach to handling opinion leaders' views in an era of intense narrative noise.

AI trading unknown, bailout crypto mainline clear

Returning to the starting point, what Hayes actually provides is quite a restrained narrative: he admits he cannot see the ultimate trajectory of AI-related assets and does not intend to bet on the binary question of "will there be a crash." What he is really willing to bet on is the potential bailout funds that governments or central banks might deploy, reaching trillions of dollars after a significant correction occurs. In the X post from October 15, 2026, Hayes has already written the trading answer at the end—in this hypothetical scenario of large-scale liquidity injections, he believes Bitcoin and Ethereum are the most direct and narratively compelling beneficiaries, and "Long $BTC $ETH" is merely a natural extension of this logic. It is essential to emphasize that at the same time, the market had no actual occurrence of a systemic crash related to AI, nor any publicly disclosed trillion-dollar bailout plans or scales; all of this remains at the macro mainline and trading hypothesis level. From a future perspective, the narrative of "AI bubble—trillions in bailouts—crypto new bull market" may become one of the candidate plots for the next round of BTC and ETH pricing, but whether it will play out depends on whether AI assets indeed evolve into a source of risk needing firefighting, and whether decision-makers choose to respond with massive liquidity. What each participant can do is simply make their judgment on the probability of these premises being met and bear the corresponding risks knowing the uncertainties involved.

Join our community, let's discuss and become stronger together!
AiCoin exclusive Hyperliquid benefits: https://app.hyperliquid.xyz/join/AICOIN88
AiCoin exclusive Aster benefits: https://www.asterdex.com/zh-CN/referral/9C50e2
On-chain Telegram community: https://t.me/AiCoinWhaleData
On-chain community: https://www.aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=N6OVMor5g
AiCoin on-chain Twitter: https://x.com/aicoinwhaledata

免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。