According to data from multiple Chinese cryptocurrency media outlets citing on-chain analyst Yu Jin/EmberCN, a large whale or institutional address has been making significant reallocations in the past three days through the path of "BTC→USDC→ETH," cumulatively selling approximately 1074.3 BTC, exchanging it for about 89.39 million USDC, and then buying about 35,346 ETH. In the past 24 hours alone, they sold about 236.6 BTC, received around 19.71 million USDC, and purchased about 7845 ETH, with the average price for the increased ETH over the past three days being approximately $2529. Almost simultaneously, the Japanese publicly listed company Metaplanet announced plans to issue zero-coupon convertible bonds amounting to approximately 52 billion yen, maturing in 2031. According to its CEO Simon Gero's public explanation, part of the raised funds will be used to repurchase up to approximately 7.1% of the issued shares and to repay credit to release Bitcoin that was previously used as collateral. One party is directly switching positions between BTC and ETH at the on-chain address level, while the other is actively adjusting assets and liabilities related to Bitcoin through traditional debt instruments. These two types of institutional behavior are resonating in time and direction, collectively forming a noteworthy configuration signal around the rebalancing of BTC and ETH.
Whale Sells Over 1000 BTC for ETH in Three Days
According to on-chain monitoring by Yu Jin/EmberCN, this whale address has formed a clear two-phase path of "BTC→USDC→ETH" within the last three days: first concentrating on selling approximately 1074.3 BTC for about 89.39 million USDC, and then using this batch of USDC to gradually buy about 35,346 ETH. In just the past 24 hours, the address has sold about 236.6 BTC, corresponding to around 19.71 million USDC, quickly exchanging that for approximately 7845 ETH. The sales of BTC and buying of ETH in one single day account for about one-fifth of the total transactions over the three days, showing a strong rhythm of continuous operation rather than a one-time large reallocation. Based on the buying data from the past three days, the average price for the increased ETH is around $2529, equivalent to a reconfiguration of BTC positions worth approximately 89.39 million dollars into an equivalent ETH exposure through USDC in a short period.
In terms of time distribution, this set of transactions concentrated around three consecutive days before and after October 14, consistently maintaining a one-way migration from BTC to ETH, with USDC only serving as a transitional asset without a long-term stay, reflecting a strong strategic consistency. The rhythm of selling over 1000 BTC and simultaneously buying over 35,000 ETH within three days suggests that the behavior of this address is closer to "short-term trend-based rebalancing" rather than opportunistic arbitrage. However, the currently available public data only covers this three-day interval, and whether it will continue to extend positions in the same direction remains to be further verified on-chain.
Implications of the Average Price for Increased ETH at $2529
According to publicly organized data by on-chain analyst Yu Jin/EmberCN, the address bought about 35,346 ETH in the past three days at an average price of around $2529, and the buying rhythm is essentially synchronized with the selling of approximately 1074.3 BTC. This means that the $2529 range has become the core area for its cross-asset reallocation based on the outcomes. For addresses regarded as whales or institutions, large-scale reallocations concentrated at a single price zone usually imply a clear relative value judgment under the historical performance framework of BTC and ETH: using approximately 89.39 million USDC obtained from reducing BTC to buy ETH reflects an attempt at rebalancing from "more mature value anchors" to "higher growth elastic assets," rather than short-term probing based on market volatility.
For other institutions or traders, the area around $2529 thus holds certain reference significance, but more as a starting point for risk-reward assessment rather than a definitive "value center." If future prices oscillate around this range, this batch of approximately 35,000 ETH will form a clear chip densification area, making the decisions of this address (to continue holding or reduce positions) significantly influential on its overall portfolio performance. If prices deviate significantly from this range, it will quickly test the correctness of this relative value judgment of BTC→ETH. External participants can view $2529 as one of the cost benchmarks for this whale’s recent activities, understanding its potential holding pressures and profit margins. However, any follow-up decision based on the behavior of a single address requires independent assessment of the withdrawal risks and expected returns that an individual can bear.
Metaplanet's Zero-Coupon Convertible Bonds
In contrast to direct reallocations between BTC and ETH by the on-chain whales, the Japanese listed company Metaplanet has chosen the traditional capital market route. The company has publicly disclosed plans to issue approximately 52 billion yen in zero-coupon convertible bonds, maturing until 2031, constituting a medium to long-term financing arrangement. According to CEO Simon Gero's statements, the raised funds will be allocated in parts: one portion will be used to repurchase up to about 7.1% of the issued shares, while another portion will be used to repay existing debts, thereby releasing Bitcoin that was previously held as collateral.
From the perspective of the balance sheet structure, this arrangement indicates that Metaplanet is simultaneously making adjustments along three lines: replacing short-term credit with long-term, low-explicit-interest-cost liabilities through zero-coupon convertible bonds, increasing the leverage of per-share assets and exposure to Bitcoin through share buybacks, while transitioning the previously pawned and locked Bitcoin from "restricted assets" back to a more proactive treasury position. The extension of the convertible bond maturity to 2031 locks in financing costs over a longer period, while releasing pledged BTC increases management's operational space regarding Bitcoin positions, essentially restoring Bitcoin from a passive collateral tool to a proactively allocatable core asset.
Institutional Rebalancing Signals between BTC and ETH
If we consider the whale address’s BTC→USDC→ETH on-chain reallocation and Metaplanet's release of collateral Bitcoin through zero-coupon convertible bonds within the same time window, we can observe two distinctly different levels of "rebalancing": one end is a single address cumulatively selling about 1074.3 BTC, exchanging it for approximately 89.39 million USDC, and buying about 35,346 ETH, continuing to sell around 236.6 BTC and purchase roughly 7845 ETH in the last 24 hours, directly adjusting exposure between the two major assets. The other end involves a publicly traded company utilizing a convertible bond issuance totaling about 52 billion yen with a maturity extended to 2031, reintegrating the Bitcoin previously used as collateral into its overall capital structure planning, using part of the raised funds to repurchase up to around 7.1% of shares and repay existing credit to free up a more proactive Bitcoin position.
According to AiCoin data, the former represents a traceable on-chain behavior of a single address, with original monitoring from Yu Jin/EmberCN and quoted by various media, signaling a preference change towards risks by "individual or entity." The latter, however, is a publicly disclosed corporate-level financial decision by Metaplanet, representing a perspective that considers Bitcoin as a long-term asset and plans its allocation in conjunction with equity and liabilities. Both actions occurred almost simultaneously around October 14, neither providing a conclusion that BTC or ETH is a "this or that" bet, but rather fine-tuning their roles within the asset portfolio at different levels: the on-chain whale increased its proportion of ETH in the portfolio at an average price of about $2529, while Metaplanet, through releasing collateral BTC, strengthened the Bitcoin component in its treasury. When combined, these actions are more akin to a rebalancing attempt regarding the weights and duration structure of BTC and ETH.
Follow-up Observation Indicators to Monitor
From the fact that in the past three days, the whale address has cumulatively sold approximately 1074.3 BTC, exchanged it for around 89.39 million USDC, and bought approximately 35,346 ETH, along with Metaplanet's plan to issue approximately 52 billion yen in zero-coupon convertible bonds and its release of previously pledged Bitcoin, it appears that the current allocation regarding BTC and ETH is more focused on rebalancing weights and duration structures rather than simply "abandoning BTC, investing in ETH" or one-sidedly increasing Bitcoin. In the follow-up on-chain dimension, it is imperative to continue tracking whether this whale address persists in the BTC→USDC→ETH path and whether it continues to reduce BTC or further increase ETH, to discern whether this recent increase in ETH at an average price of approximately $2529 is a short-term trading strategy or a more long-term asset structure adjustment. At the company level, Metaplanet's zero-coupon convertible bonds are still in the planning phase, and the actual issuance size, timing arrangements, and allocation of raised funds between stock buybacks and repayment of debts, as well as releasing collateral BTC, will directly impact the robustness and sustainability of its Bitcoin treasury strategy. It should be emphasized that the data on whale reallocations currently primarily comes from single on-chain analysis sources like Yu Jin/EmberCN. The information regarding Metaplanet is derived from CEO Simon Gero's public statements, and both the sample and data sources are relatively limited. In the future, if more independent on-chain data and more institutions publicly adjust BTC and ETH-related asset structures emerge, these new samples may help elevate today's observed signals from isolated cases to more statistically significant allocation references.
Join our community to discuss and become stronger together!
AiCoin Exclusive Hyperliquid Benefits: https://app.hyperliquid.xyz/join/AICOIN88
AiCoin Exclusive Aster Benefits: https://www.asterdex.com/zh-CN/referral/9C50e2
On-chain Telegram Community: https://t.me/AiCoinWhaleData
On-chain Community: https://www.aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=N6OVMor5g
AiCoin On-chain Twitter: https://x.com/aicoinwhaledata
免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。
