Around October 10, The Wall Street Journal cited a previously undisclosed internal investigation report from Binance, bringing to light the previously covert financial activities tied to the risk control system: According to this single-source report, Iranian financier Babak Zanjani was accused of operating around 21 personal and corporate trading accounts on Binance through affiliated companies and shell companies, creating a funding channel to circumvent sanctions for the Iranian Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), which has long been under Western sanctions and limited in its activities within the traditional banking system, involving a total of about $850 million in cross-account transactions. As one of the world's leading cryptocurrency trading platforms, Binance has consistently emphasized its KYC and AML procedures, but the very existence of this internal report indicates that the platform at least identified and recorded this high-risk financial network at some point in time, allowing the boundary between “trading infrastructure” and “sanction evasion channel” to be represented in concrete figures and specific individuals for the first time. Almost simultaneously, another traditional payments giant, Visa, released a survey targeting the Asia-Pacific region: in the past year, about 16% of consumers had actually used cryptocurrency payment tokens, but only about 6% could accurately explain how these tokens operate, with concerns about fraud and scams listed as the primary barriers to further adoption; more impactfully, this single-source research directly projected a future figure in its title — by 2031, there may be up to about 1.2 billion consumers in the Asia-Pacific region using such tokens in daily or cross-border payments. Thus, in the same technological coordinate system, one end is the sanction evasion channel disclosed by the WSJ, while the other end is the future payment blueprint outlined by Visa; when the same cross-border cryptocurrency payment tool can provide a detour for sanctioned entities, yet is viewed by mainstream institutions as the next daily payment interface for ordinary consumers, the institutional tension it carries begins to become clearly exposed.
$850 Million Underflow: Binance Accused of Serving as a Launchpad
In the internal investigation report from Binance obtained by The Wall Street Journal, the protagonist is no longer an anonymous address but rather the Iranian financial figure Babak Zanjani. The report alleges that he did not simply open one or two accounts but rather built a multi-layered funding channel surrounding the Iranian Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps: at the front end are seemingly normally operating affiliated companies, interspersed with multiple layers of shell companies, and the back end is further split into multiple personal and corporate trading accounts registered on Binance. Through this interconnected structure, the IRGC, severely constrained by Western sanctions and nearly blocked in the traditional banking system, gained an alternative route to complete fund inflows and outflows on the platform. This is a network, not a line.
According to the single-source documentation of this internal report, the funds associated with this network totaled around $850 million on the Binance platform, involving about 21 accounts. For an organization that repeatedly emphasizes implementing KYC and AML procedures and is seen as one of the world's leading cryptocurrency trading platforms, this volume and account density itself undermines the cornerstone of global compliance narratives — people began to question: Are compliance tools really firewall, or just higher-level observation posts that record “anomalies” but struggle to block them in a timely manner? Even more tensely, this report did not surface through any public compliance disclosure; rather, it was revealed around October 10 after being obtained by The Wall Street Journal, and existing reports did not disclose the report's completion date, nor did they indicate whether it was submitted to regulatory bodies, leading outsiders to deduce the platform's prioritization between risk control and information disclosure from the juxtaposition of “Binance internally identified or recorded related risky transactions” and “long-term undisclosed.” This information asymmetry itself becomes a mirror for the outside world to reassess the compliance capability of cryptocurrency cross-border payment infrastructures.
Risk Control Breached? Cracks in Major Platforms' Compliance Commitments
When a funding channel allegedly serving the Iranian Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps is traced back to one of the world's leading platforms, Binance, the outside world's first reaction is not to delve into technical details but rather to question where the risk control went wrong. Binance has long claimed to implement KYC and AML procedures, and almost all major cryptocurrency trading platforms emphasize their commitment to “know your customer” and “prevent money laundering.” However, according to the previously unpublished internal investigation report quoted by The Wall Street Journal (single-source), Babak Zanjani created a funding network on Binance to help the Iranian Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps evade Western sanctions through affiliated companies, shell companies, and multiple trading accounts, with this network involving around $850 million in transactions and about 21 personal and corporate accounts (single-source). The occurrence of funds moving on the Binance platform and connecting multiple accounts and corporate entities starkly contrasts with these compliance commitments: if the compliance framework indeed operates as claimed, such a scale and structured cross-border fund flow should frequently trigger risk control signals at the KYC and AML stages, and the existence of the internal report shows that the platform had already identified or recorded relevant transactions at some point (single-source).
What escalates skepticism is the silence between “had identified or recorded” and “the outside was completely unaware.” Aside from The Wall Street Journal's reporting, there is currently no public information indicating that Binance has released any official response regarding this incident, nor have details of any rectification paths or internal accountability leaked; key operational information such as transaction time, account names, and identities of shell companies are locked within the report and have not entered public discussion (single-source). In a context where global exchanges are increasingly asked to act as a firewall against sanctions, this incident, characterized as a compliance and sanction evasion scandal, has placed Binance in an awkward position: one end is the public commitment to KYC, AML, and “firewall roles,” while the other end is the funding channels and risk identification records unveiled by the internal investigation report (single-source). What this crack signifies — whether it indicates outdated risk control technology, governance chain failure, or a choice made between commercial interests and compliance boundaries — is currently insufficiently documented in publicly available information to draw a conclusion, yet it is enough to maintain ongoing doubt and inquiry from the outside world regarding the actual risk control capabilities of leading platforms.
Asia-Pacific Users Turning to Cryptocurrency Payment Channels
While the cracks in risk control on leading platforms are yet to be clarified, regular users in the Asia-Pacific region are already beginning to vote with their feet. A recent survey by Visa shows that in the past year, approximately 16% of consumers in the Asia-Pacific region have actually used cryptocurrency payment tokens for transactions. This number, while still early in the current stage, is already sufficient to indicate that a turning point in trend formation is emerging (single-source). More importantly, about half of the survey respondents expressed interest in using such tokens for daily payments, travel payments, and cross-border remittances in the future, scenarios that are directly related to cross-border fund flows and closely connected to real life (single-source). Against the backdrop of users' habitual complaints about traditional bank card fees, exchange rate losses, and transfer times, cryptocurrency payment tokens are seen as candidate tools to bypass friction costs, and this “willingness to try” attitude is rapidly spreading to a broader audience.
But Visa's data also reveals a massive cognitive gap underlying this enthusiasm: only about 6% of respondents indicated that they accurately understand how these tokens work; the interest and actual understanding represent almost two different worlds (single-source). In the absence of clear knowledge, concerns about fraud and scams are listed by respondents as the primary barrier to adopting such tokens; users are attracted by frequent cross-border spending scenarios, yet are filled with anxiety about the unseen technology and regulatory underpinnings (single-source). Although the specific sample size, covered cities, and time window of this research have not been disclosed publicly, Visa still puts forth an ambitious projection in the study’s title: by 2031, there may be up to around 1.2 billion consumers in the Asia-Pacific region using such tokens, a number that is both a single-source prediction and a declaration of a reshaping of the payment landscape (single-source). As regulation, enforcement, and the market closely monitor cross-border funding channels, one end is the underground channel exposed by the internal report, while the other end is the new payment path favored by mainstream financial institutions. The real choices of Asia-Pacific users will determine whether this technological path leads to a transparent and compliant infrastructure or continues to waver between the shadows of risk and high-frequency demand.
On the Same Chain: Payment Innovation and Sanction Game Intertwined
On the same cross-border token channel, entirely different stories are flowing. According to the internal report from Binance disclosed by The Wall Street Journal, Iranian financier Babak Zanjani was accused of creating a funding network on the platform for the Iranian Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, which faces long-term restrictions due to Western sanctions, accumulating approximately $850 million and involving around 21 personal and corporate accounts (single-source). This is a deliberately constructed underground channel that distances itself from the traditional banking and settlement system; technology is used to smooth over the gaps created by sanctions, and rather than being “innovation,” it is more accurate to say it is a reverse utilization of existing financial blockade rules.
Almost concurrently, Visa's research reveals another facet: in the past year, about 16% of consumers in the Asia-Pacific region have actually used cryptocurrency payment tokens, yet only about 6% can accurately understand how they function, with the research title even projecting that by 2031 this number might expand to about 1.2 billion (single-source). For ordinary users, similar tokens are merely convenient tools for cross-border shopping, remittances, or daily consumption; for sanctioned entities, the same channels serve as alternative paths to bypass banking compliance scrutiny. Based on this, the research brief points out that the roles of crypto assets and crypto payment tokens in cross-border fund flows are simultaneously under scrutiny by regulation, enforcement, and the market. Yet in the absence of public information regarding penalties or prosecutions, the question remains whether this technology is being shaped into a transparent and controllable global payment infrastructure or continues to retain a high degree of substitutability between compliant finance and grey funds, forming the core suspense of the current game.
Regulatory Storm and Adoption Wave: The Next Stop for Cryptocurrency Cross-Border Channels
Looking back from the perspective of 2026, the disclosure of the Binance internal report by The Wall Street Journal coincided almost simultaneously with Visa's research on cryptocurrency payment tokens in the Asia-Pacific area, one end being a channel accused of circumventing sanctions by creating about $850 million involving 21 accounts for the Iranian Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (single-source), while the other end reveals an early adoption picture where about 16% of Asia-Pacific consumers have already used such tokens in the past year, yet only about 6% truly understand their operational mechanics (single-source), jointly outlining a new pattern of “risk elevation + demand expansion.” Current data has yet to appear demonstrating regulatory penalty amounts, litigation progress, or detailed official responses from Binance; this information vacuum makes the game between leading platforms increasingly delicate in balancing sanction compliance, cross-border payment business, and growth impulses: they must prove to regulators and law enforcement that KYC, AML, and sanction screening can effectively block such networks, while also responding to Visa's projection that by 2031, up to about 1.2 billion consumers in the Asia-Pacific region might use cryptocurrency payment tokens (single-source), vying for discourse power in the next generation of cross-border funding infrastructure. For readers, this case, categorized by the research brief as “compliance and sanction evasion scandal + cryptocurrency payment token adoption trend investigation,” serves as a reminder that when evaluating any cryptocurrency cross-border channel, one should not solely focus on compliance risks or place blind faith in technological dividends, but rather assess the regulatory exposure, possibilities for sanction circumvention, and the actual efficiency and accessibility it provides for legitimate cross-border payments within the same infrastructure.
Join our community, let's discuss and become stronger together!
Exclusive Hyperliquid benefits for AiCoin: https://app.hyperliquid.xyz/join/AICOIN88
Exclusive Aster benefits for AiCoin: https://www.asterdex.com/zh-CN/referral/9C50e2
On-chain Telegram community: https://t.me/AiCoinWhaleData
On-chain community: https://www.aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=N6OVMor5g
AiCoin on-chain Twitter: https://x.com/aicoinwhaledata
免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。
