In the past two months, what has repeatedly unfolded on the Robinhood chain may not be an "innovation story," but rather an organized, industrialized scheme for raising funds. On September 27, on-chain analyst Wazz (@WazzCrypto) made an alarming accusation that unsettled all participants in the ecosystem: he traced a continuous chain of Rug Pull/cashing out activities on-chain, allegedly orchestrated by the same group behind the bulk issuance of tokens and repeated siphoning of funds on the Robinhood chain. This is not an accidental case of a new token plummeting; it appears more like a harvesting machine that has been operating for nearly two months, delivering a direct blow to all users who see Robinhood as a "new opportunity," including those eyeing airdrop chances.
According to Wazz's on-chain monitoring, this criminal trace is linked to at least 53 token issuance/launch projects, with the directly traceable amount of siphoned funds approximately $18.43 million, a scale that far exceeds what ordinary players might recognize as a "one-time scam." The catalyst is the DEED token on the Robinhood chain, but it is merely the tip of the iceberg—its cash-out amount even fails to make it into the top ten of this criminal network. In the context of airdrop radars, this means that on the same chain, behind different project cards, risks may be shared by the same batch of operators rather than fighting individually. It must be emphasized that all current figures and conclusions stem from Wazz's single source, reported by multiple crypto media, and the official Robinhood or independent security agencies have yet to conduct a comprehensive review. However, for airdrop radar users, a fact sufficient to undermine participation confidence has already been established: when screening Robinhood ecosystem airdrops, on-chain security, modus operandi, and screening criteria can no longer be ignored but must become preconditions for participation decisions.
Two Months, 53 Projects: The Outline of an Industrialized Scam
Tracing back along the timeline, Wazz sees not just a few accidental "incidents," but a nearly replicable, mass-production-style assembly line of criminal activity: in the nearly two months before disclosure, the same group repeatedly issued tokens and siphoned funds on the Robinhood chain, managing to connect at least 53 issuance projects according to his monitoring. The intensive, high-frequency rhythm suggests that they do not rely on any single "big order,” but treat each issuance as a repeatable process, each Rug Pull/cashing out as a predictable cash flow. This sense of rhythm is inherently marked by industrialization.
On this assembly line, the key steps always consist of only two—issuing tokens and siphoning funds—yet they have been successfully replicated on the Robinhood chain time and again. According to the same source's estimates, the total amount of siphoned funds on this chain is approximately $18.43 million. While individual projects may not be eye-catching, the accumulation of over 53 instances elevates the risk from individual cases to a systemic issue: the weak risk control in the issuance phase has become an entry point that is frequently utilized as a "batch mold"; participants with significantly asymmetric information are dispersed in a series of new projects and new stories, diluting their sense of loss. For airdrop radar users, this mode of intensive replication within two months is no longer merely a risk warning for a few tokens, but a core premise that must be prioritized when assessing the boundaries of participation in the entire Robinhood ecosystem.
DEED is Only the Catalyst; the Iceberg is Far From Visible
What truly brought this chain scam into the spotlight is a token that is not particularly "eye-catching." When tracing fund flows on the Robinhood chain, on-chain analyst Wazz first targeted DEED—it serves as the trigger for the entire investigation but is not the "protagonist" of this group’s cashing out chain. Wazz points out that the scale of funds siphoned related to DEED does not even make it into the group's top ten cash-out projects; it resembles a loose thread that has been randomly pulled from a heap of seemingly ordinary issuance records.
This detail carries significant implications for risk characterization: the publicly named amounts and projects are merely a few slices that have surfaced, not the whole panoramic view of the entire criminal chain. The 53 projects and approximately $18.43 million in siphoned funds previously quantified are provisional results based on existing traceable samples; when even the trigger is not a "top-ranked" prey, it suggests that the group's funding strategy shows a noticeable long tail, with many smaller-scale, similarly-themed issuances likely still scattered among unconnected on-chain fragments. For participants in the Robinhood ecosystem, what they currently see is a cut cross-section, not the entire "iceberg."
For researchers focused on airdrop opportunities and users of the airdrop radar, the DEED explosion acts more like an entry point rather than a singular answer. The collapse of a single project is insufficient to fully depict the risk: what really needs to be dissected is the complete path behind it—from "frequent issuance—quick accumulation of funds—unified siphoning." It replicates repeatedly across different tokens and stories, traversing through the heat, narratives, and task participation logic that users habitually depend on. Only by treating this chain of issuance and siphoning as a pre-condition for evaluating airdrop opportunities related to Robinhood can one incorporate the question "is this an extension of the same model?" as a priority judgment when observing the warming of similar project cards.
The Security Shadow of Mainstream User Chains and Robinhood Airdrops
The Robinhood chain has been marketed as a new entry aimed at "mainstream users, more compliant and friendly," and is often implicitly deemed as safer than other new chains in crypto narratives. However, reviewing the traces revealed by Wazz, what has been interconnected is a chain of sequential Rug Pulls that can operate long-term on the same "mainstream-friendly" public chain: in the past two months, at least 53 token issuance projects and around $18.43 million siphoned—these figures come from the same analyst's on-chain monitoring, enough to tear apart the surface of "mainstream equals safety." For users who view Robinhood as a low-threshold trial for the airdrop ecosystem, this contrast implies that you think you are standing on the safer end, yet in reality, you may have already entered a realm that understands how to weave mainstream narratives to gather funds better.
On the airdrop radar page, Robinhood-related projects will still appear in the form of project cards, section categorizations, and changes in popularity, but on-chain security incidents must enter the screening logic from the outset, and not become a “lesson” afterwards. When you see a particular Robinhood ecosystem project warming up, aside from considering the topicality and task pathways, you also need to actively compare this serial Rug Pull model: does it also rely on frequent issuance of new tokens, quickly gathering funds, and then completing unified siphoning? These judgments currently rest on a single-source on-chain analysis, neither can they be exaggerated as a definitive conclusion for the entire ecosystem, nor can they be dismissed as distant news unrelated to oneself. For the airdrop radar, the sorting of Robinhood-related projects must next treat these types of security signals as part of the fundamentals, rather than relying solely on popularity and narratives to determine whether to recommend them as worthwhile opportunities; for users searching for airdrop paths, regarding security incidents as a starting point rather than a afterthought is the current phase's more prudent participation stance.
On-chain Analysts and Media: Who is Watching Over the Risks?
On September 27, it was the on-chain analyst Wazz who truly brought this Robinhood chain scam into the spotlight. He initially disclosed the complete investigation context and figures on social platforms, bringing forth the accusation of an “organized, continuous Rug Pull/cashing out group” to the surface. Following this, crypto media including TechFlow, Planet Daily, and PANews quickly followed up, amplifying what was originally a signal of on-chain security circulating only within analyst circles into a risk reminder that the entire market could not ignore. This also entered the background information for airdrop radar users assessing Robinhood ecosystem opportunities.
However, it must be repeatedly emphasized that, even with several media outlets reporting, the foundational data and qualitative judgments exposed thus far still entirely stem from the on-chain monitoring of a single analyst. The briefing does not record any public responses from Robinhood officials or regulatory agencies, nor has there been a systematic review from independent third-party security organizations, meaning the event remains in the realm of public opinion and investigation, corresponding to "high-value leads," rather than definitive judicial or regulatory conclusions. The airdrop radar must also clarify this single-source attribute when citing such information.
Putting it back into the larger mainstream chain ecosystem view, the collaboration between on-chain analysts and data platforms is becoming a key component in early identification of systemic risks in airdrop research: the former is responsible for untangling suspicious patterns and making preliminary qualitative assessments amid massive transactions and addresses, while the latter incorporates these security events into the framework for evaluating project cards, section categorizations, and popularity shifts, helping participants see risk sources before spotting opportunities. Only through this multi-role collaboration can chain scams like those on Robinhood potentially be identified by enough people before such airdrop opportunities genuinely gain wide participation.
Participation Boundaries and Subsequent Observations from the Airdrop Radar Perspective
In the context of this chain scam on the Robinhood chain, airdrop participants need to proactively rearrange their "fundamental checklist": looking not just at task designs, token issuance rhythms, and short-term popularity surges, but also placing on-chain security and issuance pathways on the same level. The scale of involvement of at least 53 projects and approximately $18.43 million siphoned within the past two months means that this type of industrialized Rug Pull is no longer an "occasional anomaly,” but a structural factor capable of rewriting the risk-return ratio of the entire ecosystem. For airdrop participants, when they see a concentrated emergence of tasks on a particular chain or segment, their immediate reaction should not just be "an additional opportunity," but also "is there a similar siphoning model present?"
On the airdrop radar page, this risk will directly influence whether projects enter or remain on the observation list: task pathways, financing, and popularity surges are originally clues for screening opportunities, and once layered with on-chain security events, they transform into signals indicating participation boundaries. The current accusations regarding the Robinhood chain still reside in the single-source disclosures from Wazz and media reiterations; the briefing has not recorded any official or regulatory responses, nor is there a systematic review by third-party security agencies. Thus, the airdrop radar prefers to regard it as a "high-risk area that requires careful valuation," rather than a simple one-time conclusion. Next, whether officials or third parties will follow up on investigations or whether more independent data sources will emerge to validate or rectify existing disclosures will determine whether Robinhood ecosystem-related opportunities are continued to be observed or entirely categorized into high-risk areas.
Join our community, let's discuss and become stronger together!
Exclusive Hyperliquid benefits for AiCoin: https://app.hyperliquid.xyz/join/AICOIN88
Exclusive Aster benefits for AiCoin: https://www.asterdex.com/zh-CN/referral/9C50e2
On-chain Telegram community: https://t.me/AiCoinWhaleData
On-chain community: https://www.aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=N6OVMor5g
AiCoin on-chain Twitter: https://x.com/aicoinwhaledata
免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。
