On September 26, the synthetic dollar protocol Ethena suddenly turned the story to the next chapter: it was officially announced that the ENA incentives and inflation linked to the growth of USDe have been cumulatively reduced by about 85% since the first airdrop in 2024, and will directly drop to zero by the end of this month, after which no new related incentives will be issued or arranged—marking the official end of the stage where USDe expansion was driven by subsidies. For on-chain funds accustomed to "milk-like" yields, this is a clear signal: future growth of USDe will no longer be underpinned by additional token inflation but will rely more on the protocol's own revenue structure and market demand. On the day the announcement was made, according to HTX market information, ENA led the altcoin sector instead, with traders interpreting this zeroing of incentives as a tightening of supply compounded by an absence of negative sentiment, beginning to reconstruct the pricing of ENA based on new token economics and cash flow expectations.
Incentives Drop to Zero: The End of Inflation-Driven Expansion Stage
Since the first airdrop in 2024, Ethena has created a "high-subsidy—high-growth" flywheel linking ENA incentives and inflation issues to USDe growth: the larger the USDe scale, the more token rewards there are, with ENA continuously sold in the secondary market to subsidize the cost of holding USDe. As the operation progressed, the levels of this mechanism were gradually lowered, with token incentives related to USDe growth cumulatively being reduced by about 85%, until the September 26 announcement gave a definitive endpoint—by the end of this month, related incentives and inflation will be reduced to 0, with no new incentives arranged thereafter. The structural supply rhythm of ENA switched from "accelerated expansion" to "hard landing tightening," and USDe also bid farewell to the model of scale expansion driven by subsidies.
The direct result of the zeroing of incentives and inflation is a shift in the narrative of USDe's earnings from "reward premium" back to "underlying strategies": on-chain funds can no longer view the continuous issuance of ENA as a certainty, but must reassess the main reliance of the USDe reserve assets on perpetual contract basis trading, and the stable returns and risk exposures that the protocol can generate after previously expanding this strategy to stock perpetual contracts in cooperation with Binance. For Ethena, proactively "weaning" while growth is still considerable is a public bet on intrinsic demand and risk management: willing to let short-term funds chasing subsidies retreat, attracting long-term funds willing to bear strategy risks and understand the synthetic dollar mechanism with a cleaner profit structure, while also setting a precedent in the entire synthetic dollar space—beyond high inflation and high incentives, project parties must be able to present independent cash flows and risk controls for the market to re-price this path from subsidy-driven to intrinsic yield.
Tightening Supply Expectations: Why ENA Became a Winner on Announcement Day
At the moment the announcement dropped on September 26, traders did not read it as a "weaning risk," but rather as "tightening supply + fully priced negatives." The token incentives linked to USDe growth had already been cumulatively reduced by about 85%, and this time it was clearly indicated that related incentives and inflation would drop to 0 by the end of the month, effectively shutting off this issuance valve. For ENA, this is a clear medium to long-term supply curve signal: the previous market worry of "continuous subsidy = continuous inflation" scenario was denied by the authorities, and future circulation will come from natural releases rather than high-frequency subsidies. Under such a narrative, as per HTX market information, ENA leading the altcoin market on the announcement day effectively indicates funds are preemptively trading "tightening supply yielding valuation uplift," while questions regarding the withdrawal of subsidies and whether USDe would lose momentum are temporarily pushed to the back.
The practices of market makers and institutions changed that day as well: previously, valuation models had to provide an incentive issuance path linked to USDe scale, viewing ENA as a high-inflation, high-subsidy financing tool; now the announcement clearly conveys that no new incentives related to USDe growth will be issued in the future, permanently closing this issuance source, necessitating an overall downward adjustment of medium to long-term inflation assumptions, allowing longer-duration positions to improve their valuation multiples and holding periods for ENA. Short-term traders are more direct—first viewing "subsidy issuance essentially ends" as approaching a deflation scenario, and then deciding whether to conduct liquidity management and structural hedging in the secondary market based on price performance. This misalignment also arises: on the emotional level, ENA has captured a premium on tightening supply; on the fundamental level, whether USDe can continue to expand without subsidy-driven mechanisms remains an unresolved variable, and whether it can solidify this supply tightening premium will depend on whether USDe's actual expansion and yield performance post-subsidy exit is sufficient to support a new valuation narrative for ENA.
USDe No Longer Relies on Subsidies: A Test of the True Demand for Synthetic Dollars
Once the timeline for zero subsidies is established in the announcement on September 26, USDe is pushed back from being a "discount dollar" to the real demand test of the market. Since the first airdrop in 2024, Ethena has almost tied USDe's expansion to token incentives linked to scale, with approximately 85% of incentives and inflation cumulative reductions, resulting in a complete drop to zero by the end of this month, signifying that future increases in volume must be persuaded by the product's own interest rates and security rather than relying on ENA over-drawing future issues for marketing budgets.
This directly reshapes the on-chain "dollar yield curve." In the past, in USDe's yield structure, basis trading strategies within the protocol were merely a foundation, with thicker spreads stemming from newly issued ENA incentives; now, as subsidies are wiped out, the yield weight will have to shift toward the reserve asset strategy. Ethena previously expanded USDe reserves from crypto perpetual basis trading to stock perpetual contracts in collaboration with Binance, essentially paving the way for this shift: future USDe interest rates will be more about pricing of underlying cross-asset basis strategies rather than the premium of token inflation subsidies. For funds, USDe's yield side changes from "subsidy premium" to "strategy premium," while on the risk side it shifts from "incentives adjustable at any time" to "strategy performance determines the ceiling," placing it back on the same comparative table as centralized custodied dollar certificates and traditional dollar deposits—where the former sacrifices interest rates for regulatory and settlement convenience, and the latter relies on interest rates but lacks on-chain maneuverability, USDe instead uses programmable, cross-market deployable strategic yields to hedge its structural risks. The true watershed lies in: when token incentives are completely withdrawn, whether USDe can still maintain a sufficiently competitive risk-return ratio on this table will determine whether it is viewed as "synthetic cash" or merely a high-beta strategy ticket.
From Crypto Perpetuals to Stock Perpetuals: A Shift in Yields
As token incentives are gradually reduced to zero by the end of this month, Ethena clearly does not intend to leave the future earnings of USDe entirely up to fluctuations in the funding rates of crypto perpetuals. Previously partnering with Binance to extend USDe reserve assets' basis trading strategy to stock perpetual contracts and starting fund allocation, essentially aims to expand the protocol's revenue engine from a single on-chain perpetual to a cross-market, multi-asset basis portfolio before the token "blood transfusion" exit. In the past, the main source of revenue from USDe reserves came from basis trading on crypto perpetual contracts for BTC, ETH, etc.; now, after the official announcement that incentives and inflation will drop to 0 by the end of the month, new revenue sources from stock perpetuals are laid out on the table to fill this earnings gap after the "weaning," although the details regarding the scale and pace of this strategy have not been disclosed by the authorities, forcing the market to price this shift based on logic rather than numbers.
From a risk perspective, this step transforms USDe from "only benefitting from crypto volatility" to a yield carrier "simultaneously benefiting traditional risk assets and crypto assets." Crypto perpetual basis trading itself is highly dependent on market sentiment and funding rate cycles, and now adding stock perpetuals brings cross-asset diversification to reserves, reducing the risk of drastic earnings drops during cooling of a single market; on the other hand, it also deeply embeds USDe's performance onto the same curve as global risk assets—when both crypto and stocks contract under macro pressure, compressing basis together, USDe's natural earnings space is likely to shrink too. For on-chain funds, it is no longer just a synthetic cash tool tied to BTC/ETH volatility, but a strategy carrier leveraging the USDe shell to assume dual beta from crypto and stock, while the next observation will be how much weight Ethena allocates to stock perpetuals in USDe reserves and whether it has sufficient capital and risk control to prevent this cross-market basis portfolio from undermining the credibility of USDe itself during macro risk resonance.
From Subsidy Mining to Strategy Trading: A Reordering of Funding Queues
Once the timeline for zero subsidies is locked in, funds engaged in "task brushing" on USDe are first forced to rewrite their calculations. Over the past period, the protocol absorbed a vast amount of farmer-type funding through ENA incentives and inflation linked to USDe scale, with their core logic being "TVL goes up, incentives are obtained," while the underlying basis portfolio and risk structure behind USDe were not a priority consideration. Now, with related incentives cumulatively reduced by about 80% and set to directly drop to zero by the end of this month, this purely mining link has been severed, leaving funds on the market to reprice genuinely: whether Ethena's crypto perpetual + stock perpetual basis strategy can provide earnings matching USDe's credit risk and systemic volatility without subsidies.
The first step in the reordering of queues is a differentiation of roles. Among farmer-type funds, those with limited understanding of strategies and only recognize high APRs will likely shift to other projects still in strong subsidy phases; meanwhile, hedge funds and institutional arbitrage teams have more reason to stay, viewing USDe as a carrier tool for cross-market basis, searching for steadier spread curves between crypto and stock perpetuals. The role of market-making capital is also changing: shifting from the previous passive cooperation to maintain the depth of USDe/ENA trading in response to incentive inflows, to proactively evaluating the efficiency of USDe as a "synthetic cash leg," unifying short hedges on BTC, ETH perpetuals, and spread positions on stock perpetuals as different expressions of the same capital pool. On September 26, the day of the announcement, ENA led the altcoin sector, indicating that a portion of funds were not retreating, but rather reallocating positions freed from mining logic back into ENA and the entire Ethena ecosystem, betting on the changes in token economics and the long-term sustainability of strategy plates after the tightening of supply.
This reordering of queues can create a spillover effect towards larger market assets. Departing farmer funds are likely to temporarily flow back to mainstream coin markets and high-subsidy new projects, increasing the "rotating ammunition" for BTC, ETH, and other altcoins; whereas the remaining strategy teams, by using BTC and ETH perpetuals more strategically as underlying hedges, will alter the basis structure and funding rates of these assets, leading overall risk preferences towards a more "professional" predominance. After USDe transitions from subsidy-driven to strategy-driven, the flow of funds into BTC, ETH, and the broader altcoin sector will no longer simply follow sentiment but will rely more on the performance of these cross-market basis portfolios in different macro environments, subtly embedding variables of the Ethena ecosystem into the daily pricing logic of the crypto market.
After the Incentive Era Ends: Can Ethena Stand Firm in the Dollar Lane?
With the announcement on September 26 that token incentives and inflation related to USDe growth will drop to zero by the end of this month, Ethena actively ends the phase of relying on subsidies for expansion since the first airdrop in 2024: previously, these types of incentives had cumulatively been reduced by about 85%, and now the complete zeroing means that the risk-return structure of USDe has shifted from "subsidy for scale" to "strategy for cash flow," and the long-term supply curve of ENA and the equity nature of the protocol have been rewritten. When ENA leads the altcoin sector on the announcement day, it essentially indicates the market is tentatively pricing the future scarcity of token supply and an economic model that relies more on genuine strategy yields. The following variables will become key tests for whether Ethena can establish itself in the dollar lane: firstly, the net growth rate and resilience of USDe in a subsidy-free environment; secondly, the reserve strategy backed by crypto perpetuals and stock perpetuals introduced in cooperation with Binance, able to consistently provide risk-covering yields during different macro cycles; thirdly, the operating performance of the cross-asset basis portfolio during major market fluctuations, which must be sufficient to support viewing USDe as a "hedgeable, scalable" dollar balance tool. If Ethena can navigate these dimensions, it will not only complete its transition from inflation subsidies to strategy-driven yields but also provide a template for other synthetic dollar and yield-oriented protocols, prompting more projects to compete for discourse power in the dollar lane using genuinely replicable strategic cash flows instead of short-term inflation promises in the new cycle.
Join our community to discuss together and become stronger!
Exclusive Hyperliquid benefits for AiCoin: https://app.hyperliquid.xyz/join/AICOIN88
Exclusive Aster benefits for AiCoin: https://www.asterdex.com/zh-CN/referral/9C50e2
On-chain Telegram community: https://t.me/AiCoinWhaleData
On-chain community: https://www.aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=N6OVMor5g
AiCoin on-chain Twitter: https://x.com/aicoinwhaledata
免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。
