When Bitwise submitted an ETF application document targeting NEAR to the SEC, this Layer 1 public chain asset, which was originally circulating only among cryptocurrency trading platforms, was pushed to the doorstep of the regulated capital market in the United States. According to disclosed information, this product, which is planned to be listed on the New York Stock Exchange Arca (NYSE Arca) under the code NRR, aims to provide investors with exposure tracking NEAR's price performance. However, the only confirmed details so far are the "submission of application/registration documents" and "planned listing on NYSE Arca." Key terms such as management fees, custody arrangements, and whether on-chain staking is involved have not yet been disclosed, and there is no mention of SEC approval or specific effective dates. Bitwise’s actions essentially attempt to embed NEAR exposure into the traditional brokerage account system: if the SEC allows it in the future and NYSE Arca completes the listing, NRR will appear as a regulated security in both institutional and retail standard securities accounts. Until regulatory announcements are made, U.S. investors’ access to NEAR exposure still primarily depends on non-ETF channels like cryptocurrency platforms. Since 2021, the SEC has successively allowed Bitcoin futures ETFs and, in 2024, approved a limited number of spot Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs. However, as of October 2024, ETF applications for other single public chain assets, such as Solana, remain pending, indicating that the regulation is still very cautious when expanding the range of products beyond Bitcoin and Ethereum. Therefore, this NEAR ETF, which still exists only on paper, not only adds a new code but also places the question of whether NEAR qualifies for entry into the "compliant investment toolbox" under scrutiny. This article will explore how the regulatory game reshapes the compliant investment boundaries for NEAR along the approval chain and return to a specific question: what actual constraints and opportunities will Bitwise's doorbell ring bring to the project party and various investors?

NRR's Landing on NYSE Arca and Brokerage Channels

If Bitwise's application is ultimately approved by the SEC, after the product coded NRR is listed on NYSE Arca, NEAR's price exposure will be presented for the first time through the combination of "U.S. registered securities exchange + traditional brokerage accounts." For investors accustomed to opening accounts on cryptocurrency trading platforms, depositing fiat or purchasing NEAR over-the-counter, the path will be rewritten as: placing orders in existing securities accounts just like buying a regular ETF, with brokers interfacing with NYSE Arca to complete matching and settlement. The sequence of roles will also shift—the front-end compliance check will transfer from cryptocurrency platforms to brokers and exchanges, and the product itself will be integrated under the dual framework of SEC registration and NYSE Arca listing rules, granting NEAR exposure its first opportunity to be packaged as a security that "can appear on traditional asset allocation lists."

The most direct change from this packaging is that compliance responsibility shifts from “users holding assets directly” to “issuers and custodians holding assets for users.” On cryptocurrency trading platforms, investors either keep NEAR in their platform accounts or self-manage private keys, with risk management, on-chain security, and personal operational risks directly impacting individual assets; meanwhile, under a structure like NRR, investors actually hold shares of a trust or fund, with Bitwise responsible for the buying, selling, custody, and disclosure of underlying NEAR, while NYSE Arca oversees listing and ongoing regulatory compliance. In the U.S., such products typically need to be registered under the Securities Act of 1933 while meeting the exchange's listing requirements, which gives the SEC ample reason to focus on three main issues: how to disclose NEAR market volatility and regulatory uncertainty in the prospectus, how the underlying tokens will be custodied and isolated from risks, and whether clear enough risk warnings are provided to investors. Currently, core terms like custodianship, management fees, and staking arrangements have not been disclosed, and Bitwise’s specific design in these areas will determine whether the SEC considers NRR sufficient to securely lock NEAR exposure within existing securities rules.

The ETF Boundaries from Bitcoin to NEAR

Looking at Bitwise's NEAR application within the SEC's timeline makes the stakes of this battle clearer. Starting in 2021, the SEC first provided a relatively "safe" answer—only allowing Bitcoin futures ETFs tied to CME contracts, which locked risks within traditional derivatives and regulated exchanges. It wasn't until 2024 that some spot Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs were approved, at which point the SEC truly acknowledged: under specific conditions, investors could directly purchase spot products closely linked to the underlying asset prices. The underlying implication of this path is that "the two largest, most attention-grabbing, and most thoroughly discussed assets can be seen as exceptions," rather than a channel treated equally for all public chain assets.

As of October 2024, multiple institutions have submitted ETF applications for single public chain assets like Solana, but they remain in pending status, indicating that the SEC is not yet ready to automatically replicate the special status of Bitcoin and Ethereum across a broader public chain world. The NEAR Protocol itself is a Layer 1 public chain, and its tokens lack clear certainty in SEC public documents; now, Bitwise's declaration of its product for listing on NYSE Arca, with the code NRR, essentially forces a "currently untagged public chain asset" onto the entry path of single-asset ETFs. Regarding such assets with ambiguous definitions of "security or commodity," the SEC's common practice is not to provide a clear answer immediately but to extend review periods, repeatedly issue inquiries, and require more detailed risk disclosures and structural explanations, effectively drawing practical review boundaries at the procedural level. Whether NEAR can cross this boundary will directly determine the SEC’s willingness to expand the testing ground for single cryptocurrency asset ETFs from Bitcoin and Ethereum to a wider range of public chain assets.

NYSE Arca Platform Boundaries and Institutional Allocation

For Bitwise, after overcoming the SEC hurdle, what truly determines whether NEAR can enter mainstream asset allocation frameworks is the NYSE Arca platform gate. NYSE Arca has long been one of the main listing venues for multiple commodity and crypto-related ETFs in the U.S. These products often require exchanges to submit rule changes or listing applications to the SEC before they can be listed, so whether a product can be listed is not only a struggle between the issuer and the regulatory body but also a choice about what types of assets the exchange is willing to "endorse." In other words, for NRR to enter the code list, it must satisfy both the SEC's registration requirements and NYSE Arca’s internal risk control standards regarding the asset, structure, and trading arrangements.

Once NRR is approved for listing on NYSE Arca, the first change will be in the compliance boundaries for institutional investors. Currently, NEAR is primarily traded through cryptocurrency trading platforms and has not formed a compliant security entity that can be directly allocated on a U.S. national securities exchange. Many fiduciary investors—such as certain mutual funds, pension plans, etc.—can only gain related exposure through securities listed on regulated exchanges and are unable to directly purchase on-chain tokens. If NRR is listed as an ETF on NYSE Arca, NEAR exposure will be "packaged" within a regulated security, falling under the compliance framework applicable to ETFs and similar trust products in the U.S. Information disclosure, liquidity organization, and market-making arrangements must operate under exchange rules. For these institutions, NEAR will transform from an on-chain token into a compliant tool that can be written into investment charters and executed through brokerage accounts, and its allocation space will depend on how far NYSE Arca is willing to extend its ETF platform to single public chain assets.

NEAR Ecosystem and Signals for Public Chain ETFization

When Bitwise singled out NEAR, submitting it to the SEC and preparing to throw it into the highly regulated platform of NYSE Arca, NEAR's role shifted from "one of many Layer 1s" to "candidate financial infrastructure." Even though the SEC has not yet provided any approval or disapproval, this action itself has completed a re-labeling in terms of brand and compliance image: from the perspective of traditional institutions, NEAR is no longer just a token on trading platforms, but is a potential asset that could be written into investment prospectuses, enter brokerage accounts, and be included in compliant investment lists. For DeFi, NFT, and application projects within the NEAR ecosystem, the push of underlying assets into ETF review means that the entire ecosystem is placed under stronger expectations for information disclosure and regulation—any future governance decisions, protocol upgrades, or even security incidents could potentially be scrutinized and magnified through ETF disclosure documents and exchange rules.

For other public chain projects, the signal of this NEAR selection is even more direct: for a single public chain asset to enter the ETF product line, it must meet at least three dimensions of "hard indicators"—first, a sufficiently large market capitalization to support product scale; second, secondary market liquidity that can be verified to ensure trading and market-making operations on exchanges like NYSE Arca; third, transparency regarding token issuance, holding structures, and on-chain activities that allows asset managers and regulators to have clear valuation and risk narratives. Previous discussions concerning Solana and other public chains applying for ETFs have made many projects realize that "whether it can be made into an ETF" is turning into a real compliance threshold instead of just a market topic: projects must retain English governance records that can be referenced, publicly disclose clear economic models and on-chain data panels, and possess compliance capabilities to continuously coordinate with U.S. issuers, lawyers, and consultants. The next step is that whoever can reach this set of "ETF-level standards" regarding governance transparency, data disclosure, and compliance interfaces is likely to replicate NEAR's path toward ETF application, while public chains that fail to meet the standards will remain sidelined in the eyes of traditional capital.

NEAR ETF Approval Cycle and Contest

Returning to the timeline itself, the only two points that can currently be confirmed are: Bitwise has submitted ETF registration/application documents related to NEAR to the SEC, and the product is planned to be traded under the code NRR on NYSE Arca; aside from this, public information has not shown any conclusions about “approved,” “denied,” or “formally effective,” nor is there a determined listing date. According to the SEC's usual procedures, this document will likely undergo multiple rounds of feedback and revisions, a process that may take several months or even longer, but the specific pace entirely depends on the density of SEC inquiries and policy orientation. For external observers, several key signals are worth monitoring: first, will the SEC's first round of inquiries focus more on product structure and disclosure frameworks, or fundamentally question the inclusion of public chain assets like NEAR in ETFs? Second, will it frequently initiate extensions, or even outright deny, thereby hitting the "pause button" on NEAR along with other single public chain ETFs still pending? Third, once the first approved or explicitly rejected public chain asset ETF appears outside of Bitcoin and Ethereum, how will this precedent reshape the regulatory boundaries of the entire asset pool? For project parties and investors, the compliance bottom line is also clear: until the SEC gives a final decision, "filed" only means entering the review stage, cannot be interpreted as regulatory approval, and should not predetermine its approval, nor serve as compliance endorsement or investment pricing. The true decision regarding whether NEAR can enter the regulated brokerage account system hinges on the final outcome of this approval contest in future regulatory documents.

Join our community to discuss and become stronger together!
AiCoin exclusive Hyperliquid benefits: https://app.hyperliquid.xyz/join/AICOIN88
AiCoin exclusive Aster benefits: https://www.asterdex.com/zh-CN/referral/9C50e2
On-chain Telegram community: https://t.me/AiCoinWhaleData
On-chain community: https://www.aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=N6OVMor5g
AiCoin on-chain Twitter: https://x.com/aicoinwhaledata

免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。