Using this matter to talk about a potential rule.

The cryptocurrency world is not that peaceful, and not everyone in the industry is magnanimous. There are many small groups, and many people do not get along, especially those who have blocked each other online. If they meet offline, those with good tempers might just laugh it off, but if they encounter someone with a bad temper, who knows what will happen.

Especially those who have publicly torn each other apart in many occasions should be careful during banquets. Either invite A but not B, or invite B but not A. If it is absolutely necessary to invite both, at least ensure that they are seated far apart, and have someone specifically watching over the situation.

Some friends might say, what does this even mean? Inviting someone still needs so much effort? In fact, it is true. Most people who host banquets in public settings are somewhat “capable.” It would be unpleasant if a good press conference turned into a large-scale denouncement scene.

I have encountered this many times, for example, in Hong Kong, where two parties who have been at odds for a long time were surprisingly arranged to sit together. If there is even a hint of conflict, it is likely to escalate physically. In such situations, relying solely on the individuals’ self-control is a risk. Some friends have said that cutting off someone's financial means is like killing their parents; once these matters escalate, they're hard to control offline.

Friends in BD really need to think about this and not spend money only to end up with negative outcomes.

Additionally, being overly arrogant and domineering, no matter how famous they are, can also lead to an incident scene.

免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。