On September 18, 2026, the U.S. SEC pressed a button labeled "Five-Year Experiment": a directive that grants a temporary, conditional exemption for tokenized securities trading venues, permitting trading of tokenized U.S. National Market System (NMS) stocks in licensed automated market makers and liquidity pools. The traditional stock market, previously strictly restricted to "Eastern Time 9:30-16:00," and the on-chain market, which operates seamlessly around the clock, have had a boundary that was once considered untouchable officially documented in regulatory documents, becoming a question that needs to be experimented with, quantified, and even redefined. Almost simultaneously with the announcement of the order, Strategy CEO Phong Le publicly stated that this five-year window may likely evolve into a long-term norm; once investors experience a faster, more modern, and truly 24/7 functioning market, they will not be willing to return to the old world. AMC CEO Adam Aron promptly laid down three red lines for this experiment—investor protection cannot be compromised, stock tokens must not be synthetic alternatives and must come with complete voting rights and dividend rights, and issuers have the right to oppose their securities being placed on tokenized platforms. The rare synchronization of voices from the senior executives of these two traditional institutions indicates that this is not merely a waiver, but a five-year bet on who will dominate the time rules of the next generation of securities markets.

Five-Year Exemption Window: SEC Draws the Line for Tokenized Securities

This order published on September 18, 2026, pushes tokenized securities, which were previously in a "gray area," for the first time into a written regulatory experimental field. The core concession provided by the SEC in the document is to allow tokenized securities trading venues to trade tokenized U.S. National Market System (NMS) stocks in "licensed" automated market makers and liquidity pools—notably, in a controlled, identifiable participant environment, rather than an open pool accessible to anyone at any time. In other words, regulators are not tearing down the existing stock market rules, but rather specifically marking out a fenced area: as long as the platform locks trades within these licensed AMMs and liquidity pools, they can experiment with tokenized matching and settlement under the existing legal framework.

The five-year period is SEC's "gift of time," and it is also a safety valve reserved for itself. The order clearly states that this is a temporary and conditional arrangement, and the exemption only hangs on the five-year timeline, with no promise of automatic extension or any provisions for a transition mechanism post-five years written into the document. This means that any interpretation from the industry of "this is the new norm" can only remain in the realm of expectation rather than entitlement for now. More importantly, the conditions attached to the exemption—regardless of how many terms the outside world can currently see—continuously emphasize two things: investor protection cannot be diluted, and market integrity cannot be compromised; this window is a testing ground to bring tokenized securities into the regulatory purview, not a safe haven for platforms to circumvent regulation. The real test is who can prove that the tokenized market is worth being written into formal rules without touching these bottom lines during these five years.

AMC's Three Bottom Lines: Compliance Boundaries for Stock Tokens

When the SEC opened the five-year experiment window, defining the line of "what can be tried" and "what absolutely cannot be touched" became the primary concern for traditional issuers. AMC CEO Adam Aron quickly provided his answer. He publicly praised the SEC for establishing a five-year experiment for stock tokens while attaching his support to three bottom lines: first, investor protection cannot be weakened due to technological packaging; second, so-called "stock tokens" must not be synthetic forms tied to price or risk bets, but must correspond to real issued securities; third, these tokens must come with complete voting rights and dividend rights, and should not just simulate price on-chain while leaving corporate governance and revenue rights on another ledger. In his words, any design that deviates from the real shareholder rights structure is creating "shadow stocks," ultimately eroding the interests of existing shareholders.

Even more conflictual is the fourth role he fought for issuers—"the right to refuse." Aron emphasized that stock issuers have the right to clearly oppose their securities trading on tokenized securities platforms, signifying that even if regulation opens the experimental channel, whether a specific stock goes on-chain still depends on the issuer's stance rather than the platform's unilateral technical arrangements. For major American cinema chains like AMC, this is not only a firewall for their own capital structure but also a negotiable template that could be replicated by other traditional issuers: acknowledging the new market forms during the experimental period, and simultaneously anchoring the compliance boundaries of stock tokens within the existing shareholder rights and corporate governance frameworks through the three bottom lines of "non-synthetic, full rights, and refusal."

Strategy's Irreversible Bet: Traditional Brokers Forced to Upgrade

As the SEC's five-year experimental framework was just established, Strategy CEO Phong Le raised his stakes high. He openly judged that this five-year period "will likely evolve into a long-term norm," asserting that what is truly being tested is not a set of temporary rules, but the market form itself that Wall Street is accustomed to. Le's logic is straightforward: once investors experience a "faster, more modern, and around-the-clock" tokenized securities market, regardless of how many people in the SEC, the White House, or Congress change within five years, the market sentiments and behavioral pathways will never return to the past. This is not a bet on the political winds, but rather a bet on the irreversibility of user experience.

For traditional brokers and ATSs, this bet translates to setting the countdown clock in their trading floors. The regulatory experiment is nominally about opening the floodgates for tokenized securities trading venues, but to make these venues functional, brokers, clearing structures, and traditional exchanges must adapt to new technical and compliance modes. Le's subtext is: five years is not a waiting period, but an upgrade period; those who treat five years as a buffer to "see which way the wind blows" may find themselves left with only old systems and processes when the regulations eventually solidify. By the time investors have gotten used to the experience of around-the-clock liquidity and on-chain settlements, attempting to explain service gaps using "traditional trading hours," "legacy IT systems," and "offline compliance processes" will likely yield little room for these institutions to make a second chance.

Hyperliquid Volume Surge: RWA Leads the Way

Almost on the very same timeline that the SEC finalized the five-year experiment period, the on-chain derivatives market has already provided its answer through data. At the beginning of 2026, the Hyperliquid market based on HIP-3 only accounted for about 2% of the platform's perpetual contract trading volume, remaining a pitiful experimental arena. However, by the summer of 2026, this segment's share had soared to about 50%, leaping from the margins to become the platform's traffic hub. The driving force behind this surge is the stock market provided by TradeXYZ—covering the Nasdaq-100 index and individual stock contracts, which quickly became the dominant product in HIP-3, partially transferring the equity risk exposure that should have been completed in regulated securities trading venues into the on-chain RWA perpetual contracts.

In absolute terms, the changes are just as severe. The total trading volume of RWA perpetual contracts on the Hyperliquid platform soared from about $85 billion/month in January 2026 to approximately $470 billion/month by June, demonstrating that the real asset derivatives track has already achieved advanced pricing on-chain through an "explosive increase." At this moment, tokenized securities themselves just passed the SEC's five-year exemption into a controlled experimental phase with licensed market makers and liquidity pools. The regulatory rhythm for RWA derivatives and tokenized securities has already exhibited a clear dislocation: the on-chain market leads, while rules are passively catching up. This dislocation not only leaves ample structural room for cross-border business, allowing institutions to optimize regulatory costs across different jurisdictions and product forms, but also amplifies the temptation for regulatory arbitrage, making "where and in what form to bear the risks of the same underlying asset" a question that regulators and platforms must address head-on.

From a Five-Year Experiment to a New Normal: The Race Between Regulation and Platforms

This five-year exemption feels more like a timed race between regulators and platforms. The SEC locks tokenized NMS stocks in the "cage" of licensed automated market makers and liquidity pools, clearly stating that this is a five-year experiment, not an institutional commitment; AMC's Adam Aron lays down three red lines on the sidelines—investor protection cannot be diluted by token packaging, products must be non-synthetic and come with complete voting rights and dividend rights, and issuers retain the right to say "no"—attempting to carry traditional shareholder rights intact into this new venue. In contrast, Strategy's Phong Le sees these five years as the starting line for institutional migration, betting that once investors get accustomed to around-the-clock, low-friction trading experiences, the market will not revert to its old track; the RWA perpetual contracts on Hyperliquid escalated from about $85 billion/month in January 2026 to approximately $470 billion/month by June, while the HIP-3 market jumped from about 2% trading share to around 50% within half a year, showing that on-chain platforms have already preemptively practiced a cross-border stock derivatives world under the "get on the bus before buying a ticket" logic. The real variables over the next five years will depend on whether the SEC will "formalize" this batch of experimental platforms into permanent rules, whether Congress and the White House will take over the narrative mid-course and rewrite boundaries through legislation, and how those global platforms not included in the exemption framework will reconstruct their products and user structures in areas lacking clear enforcement expectations, thus avoiding becoming the first demonstrable subjects dealt with in this race.

Join our community, let's discuss and become stronger together!
AiCoin exclusive Hyperliquid benefits: https://app.hyperliquid.xyz/join/AICOIN88
AiCoin exclusive Aster benefits: https://www.asterdex.com/zh-CN/referral/9C50e2
On-chain Telegram community: https://t.me/AiCoinWhaleData
On-chain community: https://www.aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=N6OVMor5g
AiCoin on-chain Twitter: https://x.com/aicoinwhaledata

免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。