On September 15, 2026, the Financial Services Agency of Japan announced the "2026 Annual Financial Administrative Guidelines," bringing blockchain and on-chain finance, which had remained at the "observation and research" stage, into the main arena of macro financial administration for the first time: in these guidelines, on-chain finance based on blockchain technology, asset tokenization, and on-chain payments are directly positioned as core directions for future financial infrastructure upgrades, requiring integration with existing clearing, settlement, and payment systems, rather than being treated as marginal innovations left to develop on their own. The regulatory attitude has also undergone a qualitative change — the Financial Services Agency clearly stated that it aims to promote on-chain finance-related work under the premise of "ensuring user protection and financial system stability," while seeking to shorten and upgrade the securities settlement process, researching on-chain application scenarios including securities settlement optimization and cross-border remittances, and gradually clarifying technical, institutional, and regulatory issues through practice verification and dialogue with relevant parties. It also plans to establish a "forum for on-chain finance in the era of artificial intelligence," which incorporates the intersection of AI and on-chain finance into the same policy vision. However, these guidelines still deliberately leave room: they do not specify the regulatory attitude towards particular asset categories such as cryptocurrency trading, nor do they reveal timetables or participants for practical verification projects and forums, only providing a directional roadmap from research to institutional construction; what the Japanese regulators truly need to solve is how to incorporate on-chain finance into the main battleground of financial infrastructure upgrades without undermining the baseline of user protection and system stability.
Regulatory Shift: Japan from Observation to Testing on-chain
Before the "2026 Annual Financial Administrative Guidelines," the Financial Services Agency of Japan maintained a stance towards blockchain and on-chain finance more at the "observation and research" level, like assessing the flow and terrain from the shore; now, they have officially entered the water and constructed a platform. These guidelines explicitly incorporate on-chain finance based on blockchain technology into the framework of macro financial administration for the first time, rather than it being scattered across some pilot projects or technical research programs, marking a turning point for regulators from "observation and research" to "practical verification and institutional construction." On-chain finance is no longer just a new technological option but is incorporated into the main route of financial infrastructure upgrades, with the Financial Services Agency beginning to address, in terms of institutional design, not whether to go on-chain, but under what conditions and with what architecture to go on-chain.
The key to this shift is that regulators are attempting to build a controllable testing ground between risk and innovation. The guidelines clearly position blockchain, asset tokenization, and on-chain payments as core directions for upgrading financial infrastructure, while emphasizing the need to connect with existing infrastructure and to advance relevant work under the premise of ensuring user protection and financial system stability. The Financial Services Agency plans to establish a "forum for on-chain finance in the era of artificial intelligence" through practical verification and dialogue with relevant public and private parties, systematically sorting through issues across multiple dimensions of technology, institutions, and regulation, while researching the shortening of securities settlement processes, settlement optimization, and on-chain application scenarios for cross-border remittances against the backdrop of asset tokenization development. These arrangements themselves are not specific project announcements but rather a set of routes and mechanisms designed under macro administrative guidelines; Japanese regulators choose to first establish institutional and dialogue frameworks and then allow the market to experiment within the framework, with the true test lying in how these practical verifications can promote on-chain finance from marginal experimentation to infrastructure-level applications without disrupting the existing order.
Public-Private Co-testing Sandbox: Launching On-chain under Protection
In the Japanese context, "public-private collaborative practical verification" itself is an institutionalized testing ground. The Financial Services Agency did not use radical open language in its guidelines but instead wrote that it would advance on-chain finance work through practical verification and dialogue with relevant public and private parties, clarifying issues related to technology, institutions, and regulation in the process. Regulation does not first set out a complete set of detailed rules and then require the market to comply; instead, on-chain finance is pulled into a common testing space: regulatory agencies, financial institutions, and technology providers run on-chain payment, asset tokenization, and other solutions in real but controlled scenarios, recording issues as they operate while discussing how to amend institutions and rules within the existing financial infrastructure framework.
The key to this path lies in who defines the issues. The Financial Services Agency positions practical verification as a cooperative effort between the public and private sectors rather than a unilateral initiative from the regulators, presuming that through dialogue and data accumulation, "issues" will transform from abstract research propositions into a checklist with specific business scenarios and technical constraints, which will then be converted into agendas for institutional development through forums and administrative guidelines. Concurrently, there is the repeatedly emphasized premise condition: user protection and financial system stability must first be locked in before discussing how to expand on-chain finance; this means that any practical verification must be designed within the protection threshold, rather than relaxing the baseline in pursuit of speed. Currently, the specific participants, timetable, and implementation mechanisms for the collaborative practical verification work between the public and private sectors have not yet been disclosed, but from this narrative, it can be seen that Japan has chosen a strategy of gradual advancement to avoid chaotic expansion. What truly needs to be monitored is whether these public-private co-testing sandboxes can transition on-chain finance from controlled experiments to widely accepted infrastructure without sacrificing the premise of protection.
From Payments to Settlements: On-chain Finance Remodeling Old Infrastructure
Outside of the public-private co-testing sandbox, the "2026 Annual Financial Administrative Guidelines" actually target the most core link of the daily financial system: upgrading the infrastructure from payments to settlements. The guidelines clearly place blockchain, asset tokenization, and on-chain payments in the "core technological direction for upgrading financial infrastructure," but they do not announce a complete overhaul; rather, they emphasize the need to connect with the existing payment, clearing, custody, and settlement systems. In the narrative of regulation, on-chain payments are not a new world parallel to existing transfer networks, but are to be embedded into existing financial institutions and systems, taking on the accounting and reconciliation work originally coordinated by multiple systems, using verifiable on-chain records to replace some manual and batch processing steps.
Asset tokenization is singled out, carrying expectations for transforming securities settlement and cross-border capital flows. Against the background of asset tokenization development, the guidelines propose to promote the shortening and upgrading of securities settlement processes and intend to focus research on optimizing securities settlement and cross-border remittances as key application scenarios for on-chain finance. The logic here is not to design a "parallel universe" for on-chain that is detached from the existing securities and remittance systems, but to retain the legal and business frameworks of traditional securities issuance, trading, and custody while migrating the settlement phase to a programmable on-chain environment, compressing time and operational costs by reducing intermediary steps; cross-border remittances are also viewed through a similar path, constructing infrastructure that meets regulatory requirements and is competitive in terms of time and cost by connecting existing cross-border payment channels with on-chain accounting and clearing tools. Under this line of thought, what the Financial Services Agency of Japan is betting on is not to negate the old system with new technology, but to allow the old system to achieve a structural upgrade supported by on-chain, ultimately measuring the success of reform by the establishment of "financial infrastructure that combines convenience and competitiveness."
AI Era Forum: Bringing On-chain Finance into the Policy Center
When the "2026 Annual Financial Administrative Guidelines" introduced the new term "forum for on-chain finance in the era of artificial intelligence," the Financial Services Agency of Japan was no longer satisfied with repeatedly using terms like "research" and "observation" in their reports. The plan to establish a forum itself is a declaration of position: on-chain finance is no longer just a concept in the technology circle but has been elevated into the policy center of macro financial administration, positioned alongside artificial intelligence, and is seen as a new issue that requires systematic responses. The regulatory entity defines the forum as a platform for public-private dialogue, aimed at sorting through technical, institutional, and regulatory issues related to on-chain finance, symbolically acknowledging that the existing institutional framework is insufficient to directly accommodate this type of new financial infrastructure, requiring a dedicated discussion mechanism to reserve a "construction site" for future rules.
Including "the era of artificial intelligence" in the forum's name also exposes the regulators' preconceptions regarding the agenda direction: future discussions on on-chain finance will hardly remain limited to performance and compliance issues of the chain itself but must confront how algorithms participate in pricing, clearing, and risk monitoring, utilizing AI to understand and manage financial activities operating on-chain. Simultaneously naming AI and on-chain finance in the same guidelines means that the Financial Services Agency hopes to facilitate a shared set of problem definitions among the technical community, industry participants, and regulators within a formalized discussion framework — what kind of on-chain architecture can be integrated into existing financial infrastructure, what asset tokenization practices require additional institutional safeguards, and how to promote these attempts while ensuring user protection and financial system stability. Although the establishment time, membership composition, and specific operational methods of the forum have not yet been disclosed, the initial establishment of this "shell" in policy documents has already pulled on-chain finance from being a marginal issue into the formal track of public-private consultation, and who will be allowed into this dialogue space and whether they can truly influence the direction of the rules will become an important window for observing the evolution of Japan's on-chain finance policies.
Roadmap Emerges: The Absence of Details in Japanese-style Exploration
From the "2026 Annual Financial Administrative Guidelines," it can be seen that the Financial Services Agency of Japan has sketched out the macro outline of on-chain finance: positioning blockchain, asset tokenization, and on-chain payments as core directions for upgrading financial infrastructure within the framework of user protection and financial system stability, gradually calibrating technical paths and institutional designs through public-private practical verification and the "forum for on-chain finance in the era of artificial intelligence." This is a typical Japanese-style gradual approach — first offering directional principles and a mechanism framework, then piloting within limited scenarios, rather than throwing out a comprehensive reform plan all at once. However, as of September 16, 2026, this roadmap still remains in the "planning version," as the document has not disclosed specific project timetables or quantitative targets, nor provided a list of participating institutions for practical verification, the composition and operational details of the forum, nor the regulatory attitude towards specific asset categories such as cryptocurrency trading, and the precise integration with the existing "Funds Settlement Law" framework has not yet been written into the guidelines, leaving considerable policy elasticity and uncertainty space. What truly deserves close attention next is the actual effectiveness of the public-private collaboration projects in securities settlement, cross-border remittances, and other scenarios, whether forum topics will extend from technical assessments to rule rewriting, and how the regulatory stance on specific asset categories will be gradually concretized; these variables will determine whether this current roadmap ultimately remains a paper exploration or evolves into a mature framework for Japan's on-chain finance system.
Join our community to discuss and become stronger together!
Exclusive Hyperliquid benefits for AiCoin: https://app.hyperliquid.xyz/join/AICOIN88
Exclusive Aster benefits for AiCoin: https://www.asterdex.com/zh-CN/referral/9C50e2
On-chain Telegram community: https://t.me/AiCoinWhaleData
On-chain community: https://www.aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=N6OVMor5g
AiCoin on-chain Twitter: https://x.com/aicoinwhaledata
免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。
