The quantum story begins with a new calculation formula. Recently, researchers from several institutions, including the Ethereum Foundation, Theta Labs, and StarkWare, jointly published the latest paper, which presents a set of quantum attack circuits aimed at Bitcoin and Ethereum: approximately 1,151 logical quantum bits and about 1.3 million Toffoli gates, with a comprehensive score of around 15. More critically, compared to Google's quantum computing benchmarks announced in March 2026, the estimated computational requirement for the key steps of this design has been reduced by more than half, indicating that, on a purely theoretical level, the resource threshold for breaking current cryptographic defenses has been redefined. On one side, there’s such a long-term technological shadow; on the other, there are concrete accumulation actions—according to data from BitcoinTreasuries.NET, Strive has raised funds and purchased over 130 Bitcoins this week, and its associated asset SATA was only 0.05 dollars short of par value in pre-market trading, signifying a signal that its Bitcoin allocation strategy has entered the implementation phase. At the same time, macro disturbances on the same timeline were not absent: on September 10, 2026, the number of initial unemployment claims in the U.S. was reported at 206,000, slightly higher than the expected 205,000. After the data was released, Bitcoin briefly dipped to 77,399 dollars according to HTX market quotes, before rebounding to around 77,551 dollars. The market's response to this slight "unexpected" outcome was still to sell off initially then stabilize. The interplay of technical security concerns, institutional buying, and sensitivity to employment data has formed the current narrative tension surrounding Bitcoin: in a moment where quantum attack costs have been lowered, Strive has chosen to continue accumulating while macro data plays a significant role, the question remains whether Bitcoin is revealing greater uncertainty or some form of underestimated resilience.
Quantum computing costs halved: The step where Bitcoin is targeted
The paper jointly completed by researchers from the Ethereum Foundation, Theta Labs, and StarkWare first struck a nerve in the market with a simple and blunt conclusion: if in the future there are sufficiently powerful quantum computers, the estimated computational resources required to attack certain key steps of Bitcoin and Ethereum have been "cut by more than half" compared to Google's quantum benchmark data published in March 2026. Google’s benchmark that year was one of the reference points for assessing the quantum overhead of cryptographic tasks, which has now been directly compared and downgraded, effectively drawing a more realistically aligned red line on Bitcoin’s security ledger.
To give this red line a concrete outline, the paper provided a set of quantum circuit scales: about 1,151 "logical quantum bits" and about 1.3 million Toffoli gates. Logical quantum bits can be roughly understood as effective computational units that have undergone error correction and abstraction, ready for direct scheduling by algorithms; their number is often seen as a "host configuration" for measuring quantum attack capabilities; Toffoli gates are fundamental components used to construct complex Boolean operations in both quantum and classical computation, with their scale determining how many critical operations the algorithm will undergo at the circuit level. The circuit scale and the comprehensive score of about 15 appearing together suggest that the authors are trying to characterize the complexity of the attack with some unified metric, but the existing material does not explain how this scoring system is defined, nor does it translate "15" into a risk level that readers can intuitively understand.
What truly needs to be emphasized repeatedly is that this is a theoretical estimate aimed at the future, not an attack script that has been proven in the real world. The "decrease" in computational costs means that under a given model, attacking Bitcoin and Ethereum appears to become "cheaper," but it does not mean someone is already standing at the mainnet door with 1,151 logical quantum bits, nor does it imply that any substantial security incidents have occurred or are counting down to happen. It is more akin to a pressure test report that has updated its parameters, reminding the market that the window for quantum threats is narrowing but remains confined to theoretical discussions and laboratory projections.
Security narrative swings: The time discrepancy between developers and investors
After this new paper presented an attack cost estimate that is "more than half lower than Google's March benchmark," the long-term security window for Bitcoin and Ethereum has been systematically outlined more narrowly for the first time. The approximately 1,151 logical quantum bits and about 1.3 million Toffoli gates mentioned in the paper are not a practical script that can be implemented tomorrow but rather a cost curve that is closer to reality: under the established model, the resources required to overturn current cryptographic assumptions have been redefined as "not out of reach," which consequently shortens the security buffer period in narrative terms. Importantly, the discussion still presumes that quantum machines "if they reach a certain scale" in the future, rather than having the capability of launching a complete attack on the mainnet today, keeps the quantum threat currently limited to theoretical blueprints and risk parameters, rather than concrete attack scenarios.
This updated risk blueprint has been interpreted differently by the tech community and the financial market. The Ethereum Foundation, Theta Labs, StarkWare, and other tech parties actively participating in quantum security research are clearly projecting their vision to many years ahead, or even more than a decade, beginning their discussions from the question "how long in advance do we need to transition to quantum-resistant solutions?"; they are concerned with the protocol lifespan and cryptographic fundamentals and are promoting the exploration and discussion of quantum protection solutions within the community. In contrast, the clocks of secondary market investors are shorter, with current attention still focused on variables at the quarterly level, such as employment data and interest rate expectations—the existing material did not show any price movements attributable to the day the paper was published, and Bitcoin's current short-term spikes directly coincide with the release time of U.S. initial unemployment claims data. This does not mean that the quantum threat is trivial; rather, it indicates that it has yet to become a visible driving factor for market movements, while it has begun to occupy a small but gradually clearer parameter line within the framework of discussions about valuation discount rates and long-term holding risks.
Funding for 130 Bitcoins: Strive chooses to stand against the trend
During the week when quantum security costs were re-priced and macro data triggered market spikes, Strive provided a completely different answer. According to data from BitcoinTreasuries.NET, it has raised enough funds this week to complete the purchase of over 130 Bitcoins; the specific structure of the funding has not been disclosed publicly, but the results are clearly reflected on the asset side: Bitcoin has been tangibly added to the balance sheet. Simultaneously, Strive’s associated asset SATA opened for pre-market trading, with prices being only 0.05 dollars short of par value, and this close-to-par feedback is seen as a prompt response from the market to its Bitcoin accumulation strategy, rather than punishing this counter-cyclical buy with substantial discounts.
Being included in the list of institutional assets for Bitcoin means that Strive no longer views Bitcoin as a speculative side position, but has incorporated it into the long-term asset allocation discussion framework. This point is especially prominent in the current environment of lowered quantum attack costs and short-term price sensitivity to employment data. Choosing to increase holdings in a period of heightened security debate and enhanced volatility itself is an open signal: it places greater importance on Bitcoin as a core reserve asset in the long-term narrative, rather than on the risk parameters that have been elevated in short-term models. For these reasons, Strive's acquisition of over 130 Bitcoins has been categorized by many observers as a noteworthy funding event—not due to the scale being particularly large but because it concretely demonstrates that institutions are still willing to cast a vote of confidence in Bitcoin with actual positions amid the current contradictory narratives.
Moment of unemployment data release: Bitcoin spikes to 77,399 dollars
On September 10, the U.S. Department of Labor announced that the latest initial unemployment claims totaled 206,000, slightly above the market expectation of 205,000, with the prior value revised to 207,000. This "1,000 people above expectations" mild deviation is usually immediately framed within the context of monetary policy and economic momentum: some interpret it as an early signal of labor marginal weakness and potential easing of future policies, while others believe that such minor changes are insufficient to shift the overall trajectory and will only temporarily disturb risk appetite. According to HTX market reports, after the data was released, Bitcoin’s quote briefly dipped down to 77,399 dollars and then quickly rebounded to approximately 77,551 dollars, with this fluctuation occurring almost entirely within the announcement window.
This few hundred-dollar level instantaneous dip and recovery indicate that under the current environment, Bitcoin remains highly sensitive to macro data such as employment; a slight deviation from the expected numbers is enough to trigger rapid repricing of trader sentiment and models. However, it’s crucial to delineate boundaries: the existing material only indicates the correlation between the spike point and the timing of the data release, along with the subsequent quote's rough correction, without providing hourly or daily trends or any supplementary evidence from on-chain or derivatives dimensions. Under such information density, we can only confirm that the release of macro data is closely related to market fluctuations in timing, but we cannot simplistically attribute this spike to "unemployment data as a singular cause"; it appears more like a market segment awaiting detail completion.
Technical shadow and institutional buying: What Bitcoin is watching next
The estimated cost of quantum attacks has decreased by more than half compared to Google's benchmark from March this year, compressing the long-term security window for Bitcoin; almost simultaneously, Strive raised funds and purchased over 130 Bitcoins this week, with the pre-market trading prices of its associated asset SATA close to par value, indicating that there are still institutions actively expanding Bitcoin asset exposure even as the technical shadow lingers. Meanwhile, after the U.S. initial unemployment claims data was slightly above expectations, Bitcoin briefly spiked down to 77,399 dollars and then quickly recovered, reminding us that macro data can still instantaneously rewrite market sentiment. Putting these three clues together, Bitcoin is not simply being "suppressed by quantum threats" or "supported by institutional buying"; a long-term and short-term narrative intertwining curve is formed between technical security, macro environment, and institutional behavior: the paper lowers the theoretical threshold for future attacks but has yet to create observable large-scale sell-offs or abnormal capital pathways on-chain; Strive's accumulation and SATA's closeness to par value more reflect individual institutions' reassessment of risk-reward rather than direct expressions regarding quantum issues; the spikes triggered by initial unemployment claims expose Bitcoin's sensitivity to economic expectations within a minute-level timeframe. Under the current narrative-focused materials that lack a wider timeframe and more address-level evidence, what truly deserves observation next is whether quantum security research continues to lower attack costs or spur community-level response plans, whether there will be continued accumulations like Strive in subsequent institutional holding disclosures or conversely, reductions, and how Bitcoin evolves in its on-chain and market feedback regarding future employment and inflation data points. These three variables will collectively determine Bitcoin's risk profile and confidence direction amid the intertwined environments of technical shadows, institutional buying, and macro fluctuations.
Join our community, let’s discuss and become stronger together!
AiCoin exclusive Hyperliquid benefits: https://app.hyperliquid.xyz/join/AICOIN88
AiCoin exclusive Aster benefits: https://www.asterdex.com/zh-CN/referral/9C50e2
On-chain Telegram community: https://t.me/AiCoinWhaleData
On-chain community: https://www.aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=N6OVMor5g
AiCoin on-chain Twitter: https://x.com/aicoinwhaledata
免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。
