When SB Energy, an energy and data center operator backed by SoftBank, recently filed for an IPO and revealed approximately $439 billion in contracted backlog corresponding to 8.8GW of data center capacity in its prospectus, the market was forced to confront a fact for the first time: in the 2026 wave of AI, electricity and data centers are no longer just cost items but can be capitalized and even competed for as a "new asset class." More dramatically, OpenAI, which is both a major client of SB Energy and has invested about $500 million in advance while securing approximately $5.5 billion in warrants, transformed the originally volatile energy cash flows into a structure of "contracted computing power + equity options," making them closer to long-term predictable, discountable quasi-fixed income assets. On one hand, AI energy is being financialized; on the other, the U.S. Department of Commerce has started using Chainlink to put macroeconomic data on-chain, directly injecting sovereign statistical benchmarks into the DeFi oracle system, allowing on-chain interest rates, leverage, and derivatives to connect with official data sources for the first time; meanwhile, reports indicate that discussions within the Trump administration regarding potential military strikes on Iran have intensified geopolitical risks associated with Middle Eastern energy, driving uncertainties in crude oil and electricity costs back into the real world. In the current context where AI infrastructure is treated as new bonds, sovereign data is brought on-chain, and the shadow of energy shocks overlaps, BTC, ETH, and the on-chain finance built around them can no longer be priced using the traditional "high Beta risk asset" template, but are forced to seek a new equilibrium point between energy cost curves and global risk appetite.

$439 billion AI Orders: Capital Flows into Electricity

SB Energy laid out a new account in its prospectus: approximately $439 billion in contracted backlog, corresponding to 8.8GW of data center capacity, with major clients concentrated in the AI sector, and OpenAI specifically named. This is not a traditional one-off engineering project but more like a long-term power and data center lease locked in by the demand for AI computing power—whoever secures this capacity binds the most scarce factor of production for the next decade or more. On a macro level, a new variable has emerged: high-quality electricity and data centers are no longer just cost items but are viewed as predictable cash flow assets, beginning to compete on the same stage as sovereign debt and infrastructure credit.

When orders like $439 billion are packaged into long-term contracts, REITs, or infrastructure funds, the focus of global capital expenditure shifts partly from traditional equity and debt to this new foundational asset class of “electricity + data centers” in the AI era. For the cryptocurrency market, this rewrites the risk premium anchor point: on one side, BTC based on the electricity cost curve, with its mining marginal cost possibly increasing after AI competes for cheap electricity, providing a higher "energy floor" for prices; on the other side, real assets with visible yields, supported by electricity costs and data center rents, provide a new choice for capital that lies between bonds and technology stocks. The result is that BTC/ETH can no longer be simply treated as abstract "tech Beta," but must be placed in the same pricing system along the "energy—data—on-chain assets" curve, and the redistribution of capital along this curve will determine how much risk budget and narrative premium they can obtain in the next phase.

OpenAI Bets on SB Energy: Computing Power Lease as Bonds

When OpenAI invested approximately $500 million into SB Energy, securing about $5.5 billion in warrants, while locking in part of the data center and electricity resources under its customer identity, what the market saw was not merely an equity investment but a long cash flow curve purchased by a top-tier buyer. For SB Energy, this means that future income from electricity bills and data center rents is largely underwritten by a highly credible long-term customer; for allocators, this curve, in a high-interest-rate environment, possesses a clear duration and relatively predictable cash flows, just with the underlying collateral shifting from "taxes" and "balance sheets" to the variables of "electricity prices + computing power demand."

Once the AI energy cash flow is regarded by the market as high quality and predictable income, it not only becomes an equity story but resembles a quasi-bond "computing power coupon." This pricing framework easily spills over to on-chain: in the DeFi world, various cash flows have already been packaged into on-chain yield certificates using RWA bonds and yield-bearing tokens. The next step is that the so-called "computing power income" and "RWA income" narratives will naturally use AI energy coupons as anchor points to rewrite discount models. Consequently, the on-chain yield curve must align with this real-world computing power curve. If AI-themed tokens claim to distribute computing power or data center income, their valuation premium's viability will directly depend on their relative risk compensation against these "computing power bonds." The formation of this computing power income curve will become one of the core variables in observing DeFi yield pricing and AI token valuation in the future.

U.S. Department of Commerce Uses Chainlink: Data on-chain DeFi

As the computing power income curve becomes more established, on the other side, the data itself also begins to rewrite pricing logic. The U.S. Department of Commerce, by using Chainlink to put macroeconomic data on-chain, has been described by the media as the "first deep integration" of government data and blockchain infrastructure, meaning the on-chain world has connected with macro data pricing that carries sovereign backing for the first time. For DeFi, which relies on oracles, this is not merely a new API but a new risk-free curve: past protocols could only weigh between "who is less likely to make mistakes" among private data vendors and oracle networks, but now there is an "official version" macro time series, which serves as a public benchmark for on-chain interest rates, discounting, and risk models.

Chainlink itself is already one of the most widely used oracles in DeFi, providing price feeds for lending, derivatives, and dollar-pegged asset protocols across multiple public chains. The reliability and latency of its network are directly written into collateral rates, liquidation rules, and interest rate curves. After the integration of sovereign data, on-chain lending rates can more easily anchor to the real-world macro environment: when real-world interest rates and risk compensation change, on-chain protocols can adjust interest rate ranges and collateral discounts more quickly through official data, reducing the risk mismatch of "on-chain yields and off-chain macro disconnection." For collateral assets like BTC and ETH, liquidation and risk parameters start to link around "official macro data + market prices," and the corresponding volatility premium will be revalued. As the core infrastructure connecting government data and DeFi, Chainlink's position in the entire oracle track will be further elevated, and the risk premium of its tokens and similar projects will be re-ranked around this new narrative of "sovereign data monopoly."

Iran Risks and Energy Security: Volatility Transmission in BTC Mining Costs

As the narrative of "sovereign data on-chain" has yet to be fully digested, according to Axios quoting U.S. officials, discussions within the Trump administration about potential military options against Iran, code-named "mowing the lawn," have shifted market focus back to the Middle East. Iran and its surroundings are already major sources of global oil supply; once there is a military strike option, even if it has not yet materialized, the oil and gas market will pre-emptively factor in this uncertainty into prices, thus raising the Middle East risk premium. For capital, the AI data center elevates the long-term electricity demand curve, while the Middle Eastern situation adds a short-term energy risk factor; together, they directly drive up the expected volatility in the global marginal electricity cost curve.

Bitcoin mining consumes an enormous amount of electricity, and the miner's profit model essentially is "price ÷ (electricity cost + other operating costs)." Once energy prices fluctuate severely, the differences in regional electricity prices and local energy policies will be amplified. Historically, whenever energy costs rise significantly, some high-cost mining facilities shut down or relocate, visibly rearranging the landscape of computing power. The outflow and concentration of computing power elevate some miners' marginal costs and forced selling pressures while altering the network's security margin and block stability, making BTC's supply-side volatility higher. In such an environment, BTC, as a "digital commodity," is no longer only sensitive to macro interest rates and liquidity but is also influenced by the intersections of the AI electricity demand curve and Middle Eastern geopolitical risks; thus, its correlation with traditional energy assets is re-anchored, forcing the market to reevaluate the risk premium of this on-chain commodity using the dual-factor framework of "interest rates + energy."

The Next Step for Crypto under AI Energy and Sovereign Data Empowerment

As SB Energy approaches IPO with approximately $439 billion and around 8.8GW of long-term data center capacity, and OpenAI locks in computing power as a financial asset through its investment of about $500 million and warrants worth approximately $5.5 billion, combined with the U.S. Department of Commerce sending macroeconomic data directly on-chain via Chainlink, these three threads together are actually rewriting global asset imaginings of "safe yields": one end consists of AI energy projects with long-term fixed electricity and rack prices, while the other end features an on-chain yield curve based on sovereign data pricing. The risk premium of cryptocurrency assets is no longer only sensitive to the federal funds rate and liquidity; rather, it must find a new pricing anchor between "AI electricity cash flows + sovereign data interest rates." The relative value of BTC and ETH will increasingly be compared within the basket of energy and computing assets: the former's mining marginal costs will fluctuate with geopolitical risks in the Middle East and oil price risk premiums, while the latter's security budget and block reward income will be contrasted with the rent rates of AI racks and data center returns. Simultaneously, the interest rate curves of DeFi and various on-chain dollar assets will be restructured around sovereign data price feeds from the U.S. Department of Commerce, refining the risk tiers between "on-chain bond yields" and protocol-native yields. The real focus moving forward should not be on any particular chain or token but on whether the correlation between AI energy assets and mainstream crypto assets will continue to increase, whether Chainlink can expand government data into multi-country and multi-dimensional oracle infrastructure, and how potential conflicts in the Middle East continue to reshape global miners' electricity costs and geographical distribution of computing power. These three variables will jointly determine the long-term pricing framework of the crypto market under new yield anchors.

Join our community, let’s discuss and grow stronger together!
Exclusive Hyperliquid benefits for AiCoin: https://app.hyperliquid.xyz/join/AICOIN88
Exclusive Aster benefits for AiCoin: https://www.asterdex.com/zh-CN/referral/9C50e2
On-chain Telegram community: https://t.me/AiCoinWhaleData
On-chain community: https://www.aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=N6OVMor5g
AiCoin on Twitter: https://x.com/aicoinwhaledata

免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。